Analysis of the Mental Workload of Police Helicopter Pilots on Police Operations Assignment in Papua: NASA-TLX Method Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i16.19145Keywords:
mental workload, Indonesia National Police Helicopter Pilot, NASA-TLXAbstract
Police helicopter pilots play a critical role in the success of various operational assignments. These officers, under the Directorate of Air Police Corps (Baharkam Polri), are trained aviators responsible for flying helicopters and other aircraft under specific operational requirements. The Directorate of Air Police is tasked with a range of duties including early detection, air escort, air ambulance, pursuit, leadership transportation support, and other mission-critical operations. This study aims to analyze the mental workload of police helicopter pilots deployed in Papua, where they face significant challenges such as extreme weather conditions, difficult terrain, and the constant threat of attacks from Armed Criminal Groups (KKB). A quantitative method was employed using the NASA-TLX, which evaluates six dimensions: Physical Demand, Temporal Demand, Mental Demand, Effort, Performance, and Frustration. Eight Bell 412 participated in the study by completing the NASA-TLX questionnaire. Results showed an average workload score (80–100), indicating a very high mental burden. These findings suggest the need for leadership within the Indonesian National Police to prioritize mental health by implementing regular rotation schedules to mitigate stress and fatigue among aviation personnel.
References
[1] Jex HR. Measuring mental workload: Problems, progress, and promises. Advances in psychology. Volume 52. Elsevier; 1988. pp. 5–39.
[2] “HUMAN MENTAL WORKLOAD.”
[3] Wickens CD, Helton WS, Hollands JG, Banbury S. Engineering psychology and human performance. Routledge; 2021. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003177616.
[4] D. Attwood et al., “In Crowl, D,” Human factors methods for improving kinerjance in the process industries. Center for chemical process safety: John Willey & Sons, Inc, 2007.
[5] Sanders MS, McCormick EJ. Human control of systems. Human factors in engineering and design. Volume 301-334. Singapore: McGraw-Hill, Inc; 1992. p. 58.
[6] Mattews G, Davies D, Westerman S, Stammers R. Human performance: Cognition, stress, and individual difference. Hove, UK: Psychology Press; 2000.
[7] Hart SG, Staveland LE. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. Adv Psychol. 1988 Jan;52(C):139–83.
[8] Hidayat TF, Pujangkoro SA, Kes AM. Pengukuran beban kerja perawat menggunakan metode nasa-tlx di rumah sakit xyz. Jurnal Teknik Industri USU. 2013;2(1):219310.
[9] Sublette M, Carswell CM, Grant R, Klein M, Seales WB, Clarke D. “Anticipated vs. experienced workload: How accurately can people predict task demand?” in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Human Factors an Ergonomics Society Inc., 2009, pp. 1383–1387.
[10] Rovira E, McGarry K, Parasuraman R. Effects of imperfect automation on decision making in a simulated command and control task. Hum Factors. 2007 Feb;49(1):76– 87.
[11] Röttger S, Bali K, Manzey D. Impact of automated decision aids on performance, operator behaviour and workload in a simulated supervisory control task. Ergonomics. 2009 May;52(5):512–23.
[12] Svensson E, Angelborg-Thanderz M, Sjöberg L, Olsson S. Information complexity— mental workload and performance in combat aircraft. Ergonomics. 1997 Mar;40(3):362–80.
[13] Irwin CB, Duff SN, Skye JL, Wiegmann DA, Sesto ME. “Disability and orientationspecific performance during a reciprocal tapping task,” in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting, SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 2010, pp. 581–585. https://doi.org/10.1037/e578672012-009.
[14] Chen KB, Savage AB, Chourasia AO, Wiegmann DA, Sesto ME. Touch screen performance by individuals with and without motor control disabilities. Appl Ergon. 2013 Mar;44(2):297–302.
[15] Chourasia AO, Wiegmann DA, Chen KB, Irwin CB, Sesto ME. Effect of sitting or standing on touch screen performance and touch characteristics. Hum Factors. 2013 Aug;55(4):789–802.
[16] Hancock AP, Meshkati N. Human Mental Workload. Volume 9. Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishing Company Inc; 1988. pp. 1–3.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Stefanus T.W Ariyanto, Achmad Ridwan, Riyan Arthur

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.