The Development of Performance-based Model Authentic Assessment on Archival Subject
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i3.1881Abstract
The developed assessment models use two types of test or non-test instruments which are divided into three aspects: performance, knowledge, and social behavior [23]. The purpose of this research is to develop a product in the form of an authentic assessment instrument package based on the performance of Archival Subject in Vocational High School using the research and development research technique. Borg and Gall describe the expedient of the instruments through expert validations & readability try-outs and describing the result of the implementation using the quasiexperimental method design by using the technique of analyzing the quantitative and qualitative data. Authentic assessment model is developed as an assessment model that constructs learning [36] and increases the concept of knowledge, behavior, and skills of the students comprehensively and objectively to fulfill the assessment criteria.
Keywords: authentic assessment, performance assessment, archival learning, vocational high school
References
Agyor, N., & Burhanzade, H. 2015. Students’ Performances in Solving 2
Alias, M., Masek, A., Salleh, H., M. 2014. Self, Peer, and Teachers Assesments in Problem Based Learning: Are They in Agreements?. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science. 204. (Online). (http://www.sciencedirect.com) accessed on 3 Februari 2017.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. 2014. Kerangka Landasarn untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen (Revisi Taksonomi Pendidikan Bloom). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Arifin, Z. 2013. Evaluasi Pembelajaran (Prinsip, Teknik, dan Prosedur). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Azis, A. A., Sheikh, S.N. S., Yusof, K. M., Udin, A., & Yatim, J. M. 2012. Developing a Structural Model of Assesing Students’ Knowledge-Attitudes toward Sustainability. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science. 56. (Online). (http://www.sciencedirect.com) di akses 3 Februari 2017.
Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. 1988. Educational Research an Intoduction (Fourth Edition). New York, London: Longman Inc.
Caliskan, H., & Kasikci, Y. 2010. The Aplication of Traditional and Alternative Assesment and Evaluation Tools by Teachers in Social Studies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science. 2. (Online). (http://www.sciencedirect.com) accessed on 3 Februari 2017
Cepni, S., & Cil, E. 2009. A Case Study for Reliability on Portofolio Evaluation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science. 197. (Online), (http://www.sciencedirect.com) accessed on 20 Februari 2017.
Chabeli, MM. 2002. Portofolio Assesmnets and Evaluation: Implications and Guidelines for Clinical Nursing Education. Curationis-Journal of the Democratic Nursing Organization of Shouth Africa. 25 (3). (Online). (http://www.curationis.org.za) accessed on 3 Februari 2017.
Cotrus, A., Stanciu, A. 2014. Study On Dynamic Assesment Techniques, As A Method Of Obtaining A High Level Of Learning Potential, Untapped By Conventional Assesment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science. 116. (Online), (http://www.sciencedirect.com) accessed on 20 Februari 2017.
Dogan, C. D., & Kultu, O. 2010. Factors Effecting Level of Prefering Alternative Assesments Methods. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science. 9. (Online). (http://www.sciencedirect.com) di akses 3 Februari 2017.
Fatonah, S., Suryata, P., Kun, P. 2013. Developing an Authentic Assessment Model in Elementary School Science Teaching. Journal of Educational and Practice. 4 (13) Yogyakarta: Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. (Online), (http://www.iiste.org) accessed on 22 November 2015.
Goksu, I., & Gulcu, A. 2016. The Evaluation of the Cognitive Learning Process og the Renewed Bloom Taxonomy Using a Web Based Expert System. TOJET: The Tourkish Online Journal of Education Technology. 15 (4). (Online). (http://www.tojet.net) di akses 3 Februari 2017.
Gonzales, K., Padilla, E., & Rincon, D. 2011. Roles, Functions and Necessary Competence for teacher’ Assesment in B-Learning Contexts. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science. 116. (Online), (http://www.sciencedirect.com) accessed on 20 Februari 2017.
Gunduz, A. Y., Alemdag, E., Yasar, S., & Erdem, M. 2016. Design of A Problem Based Learning Environment and Evaluation of Its Effectivenes. TOJET: The Tourkish Online Journal of Education Technology. 15 (3). (Online). (http://www.tojet.net) di akses 3 Februari 2017
Haryono, A. 2009. Authentic Assessment dan Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Pengembangan Kemampuan Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi.2(1). Malang: Fakultas Ekonomi-UM. (Online). (http://www.jpe.ac.id) accessed on 22 November 2015.
Hursen, C. 2011. Psychologycal Counselling and Guidance Department’s Students Assesment on Learning to Learn Perception of Competence. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science. 30. (Online). (http://www.sciencedirect.com) di akses 3 Februari 2017.
Khonbi, Z. A., & Sadeghi. 2013. The Effect of Assesment Type (Self vs. Peer) on Iranian uviversity EFL Student’s Course Achievement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science. 204. (Online). (http://www.sciencedirect.com) accessed on 3 Februari 2017.
Kolayis, I. E., Cilli, M., Ertan, H., Knicker, A. 2014. Assesment of Target Performance in Archery. 152. (Online) Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science. 116. (Online), (http://www.sciencedirect.com) accessed on 20 Februari 2017.
Kultu, O., Bilican, S., & Yildirim, O. 2010. A study on the Primary School Teachers’ Atitudes Toward Rubrics with Reference to Different Variables. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science. 2. (Online), (http://www.sciencedirect.com) accessed on 20 Februari 2017.
Light, R. & Georgakis, A. 2007. Inovasion Games in Physical Education: Assesning Knowledge-in-Action in Using the Team Support Assesment Procedur. Proocedings of the Authentic Assesment Practices for Student Learning Converence.Sydney: Faculty of Education and Social Work, The University of Sydney. (Online). (http://www.sydney.edu.au) accessed on 25 November 2015.
Loughland, T. 2007. An Explanatory Study of the Pedagogical Use Moodle to Scaffold Learning in a Senior Secondary Class. Proocedings of the Authentic Assesment Practices for Student Learning Converence.Sydney: Faculty of Education and Social Work, The University of Sydney. (Online). (http://www.sydney.edu.au) accessed on 25 November 2015.
Lucas, R. 2007. A Study on Pertofolio as an Effective Student SelfEvaluation Scheme. The Asia Pasific Education Reseacher. 16 (1). (Online). (http://www.dlsu.edu.ph) accessed on 3 Februari 2017.
Marhaeni, A.A.I.N., Ramendra, D. P., Dewi, E. S. 2012. Pelatihan Pengembangan Penilaian Kinerja Menulis Bahasa Inggris Bagi Guru Bahasa Inggris Sma Kecamatan Buleleng.Laporan Pengabdian Masyarakat tidak diterbitkan. Singaraja: UPG Fakultas Bahasa & Seni
Mutalib, A. A., Hamid, R., Isa, F. L. M., & Abdullah, S. 2012. Evaluation of the Engineering Graphics Course Outcomes Using Multi-Choice Questions. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science. 60. (Online). (http://www.sciencedirect.com) accessed on 3 Februari 2017
Olivares, C., Merino, C., & Quiroz, W. 2014. Gowin’s V as an Instrument for Systematization of Chemical Knowledge. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science. 116. (Online). (http://www.sciencedirect.com) di akses 3 Februari 2017.
Oren, F. S. & Ormanci, U. 2011. Teacher Candidate Levels of Familiarity With the Methods, techniques and Tools Composing the Alternative Assesment Approaches. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science. 15. (Online), (http://www.sciencedirect.com) accessed on 20 Februari 2017.
Palm, T. 2008. Performance Assessment and Authentic Assessment: A Conceptual Analysis of the Literature. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation.13 (04). (Online). (http://www.edusci.umu.se) accessed on 25 November 2015.
Razzak, N. A. 2012. Problem-Based Learning in the Educational Psychology Classroom: Bahraini Teacher Candidates’ Experience. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.24(2).(Online), (http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/) accessed on 25 November 2015.
Retnawati, H. 2015. A Comparison of Accuracy Scores on the Paper and Pencil Testing vs. Omputer Based Testing. TOJET: The Tourkish Online Journal of Education Technology. 15 (4). (Online). (http://www.tojet.net) di akses 3 Februari 2017.
Rizema, S., P. 2013. Desain Evaluasi Belajar Berbasis Kinerja. Yogyakarta: Diva Press
Samian, Y., & Noor, N. M. 2012. Students’ Perception on Good Lecturer Based on Lecturer Performance Assesment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science. 56. (Online). (http://www.sciencedirect.com) accessed on 3 Februari 2017
Schipor, D. M., & Bujor, L. 2011. Building a Tool for Psychometric Evaluation of Student’s Attitudes Concerning Teaching Career. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science. 11. (Online), (http://www.sciencedirect.com) accessed on 20 Februari 2017
Sundari. 2014. Model Pengembangan Asesmen Kinerja (Performance Assesment) Matapelajaran IPA Berbasis Nilai Karakter di SMP Kota Ternate Maluku Utara. Jurnal EduBio Tropika. 2 (1). (Online), (http://jet.jurnal.web.id) accessed on 5 Februari 2016.
Tasdemir, F. 2015. A Study For Developing A Success Test: Examination Of Validity And Classification Accuracy By ROC Analysis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science. 191. (Online). (http://www.sciencedirect.com) accessed on 3 Februari 2017
Taylor, P. & Maor, D. 2000. Assesing the effivacy og online teaching with construktivist On-Line Learning Environment Survey. Teaching and Learning Forum. (Online). (www.murdoch.edu.au) di akses 3 Februari 2017.
Utaberta, N., & Hassanpour, B. 2012. Reconstrucing a Framework for CriteriaBased Assesment and Grading in Architechture Design Studio. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science. 142. (Online), (http://www.sciencedirect.com) accessed on 20 Februari 2017.
Wiggins, G. 2011. A True Test: Toward More Athentic and Equitable Assesment. 1989. Phi Delta Kappan International. 70 (9). (Online). (www.jstor.org/sable/20404004) di akses 3 Februari 2017.
