Education and Welfare: The Role of Public Policy in Equalizing Educational Opportunities for the South Papua Generation

Authors

  • Pulung Riyanto Physical Education Study Program, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, 13220, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2266-8186
  • Junaidi . Physical Education Study Program, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, 13220, Indonesia
  • Hidayat Humaid Physical Education Study Program, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, 13220, Indonesia
  • Beatus Tambaip Public Administration Science, Universitas Cenderawasih, 99358, Indonesia
  • Samsudin . Physical Education Study Program, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, 13220, Indonesia
  • Moch Asmawi Physical Education Study Program, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, 13220, Indonesia
  • Johansyah Lubis Physical Education Study Program, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, 13220, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i31.17616

Abstract

This research aims to identify public policies that increase access to education in South Papua, analyze their impact on educational equality, and evaluate the factors that influence the effectiveness of these policies, including the social, economic, and cultural challenges faced by local communities. This research uses qualitative methods and a case study approach to investigate the role of public policy in improving access and quality of education in Merauke Regency, especially Waan District. Through a purposive sampling approach, this research selected a representative sample to explore challenges and solutions in education in the region. The research instrument includes indicators such as access to education, quality of education, community involvement, and the impact of education policies, which will be analyzed comprehensively using a qualitative approach. The research results show that public policy has increased access to education in South Papua through infrastructure, scholarship programs, and improving the quality of teachers and curriculum. The development of educational infrastructure, including school buildings and learning facilities, has a positive impact on the accessibility and quality of education in the region. The scholarship program needs to be updated to reach the right targets and be effective for the people who need it. Improving teacher quality and adjusting the curriculum supports education standards in South Papua, but needs to be further encouraged through continuous training. Social factors such as economic inequality, gender inequality, and traditional culture influence access to education, requiring a holistic approach to education policy.

Keywords: education, well-being, public policy, educational opportunities, South Papuan Generation

References

Regmi K, Jones L. A systematic review of the factors - enablers and barriers - affecting e-learning in health sciences education. BMC Med Educ. 2020 Mar;20(1):91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02007-6

Choy B, Arunachalam K, S G, Taylor M, Lee A. Systematic review: Acculturation strategies and their impact on the mental health of migrant populations. Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2020 Dec;2:100069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhip.2020.100069

Easterbrook MJ, Hadden IR. Tackling educational inequalities with social psychology: Identities, contexts, and interventions. Soc Issues Policy Rev. 2021;15(1):180–236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12070

Pham NB, Okely AD, Whittaker M, Siba P, Pomat W. Millennium development goals in Papua New Guinea: Towards universal education. Educ Res Policy Pract. 2020;19(2):181–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-019-09255-4

Ainscow M. Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nord J Stud Educ Policy. 2020;6(1):7–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587

O’Day JA, Smith MS. Quality and equality in American education: Systemic problems, systemic solutions. Dyn Oppor Am Evid Perspect; 2016. pp. 297–358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25991-8_9

Vadivelan K, Sekar P, Sruthi SS, Gopichandran V. Burden of caregivers of children with cerebral palsy: An intersectional analysis of gender, poverty, stigma, and public policy. BMC Public Health. 2020 May;20(1):645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08808-0

MacLachlan M, Banes D, Bell D, Borg J, Donnelly B, Fembek M, et al. Assistive technology policy: A position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 Jul;13(5):454–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1468496

Fiharsono A, Carey M, Hyde M, Beazley H, Yektiningtyas-Modouw W. Culturally based learning needs of Korowai students in a lowland-remote area of Indonesian Papua: School physical environment and building design. Aust Educ Res. 2023;:1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-023-00615-x

Madani RA. Analysis of educational quality, a goal of education for all policy. High Educ Stud. 2019;9(1):100–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v9n1p100

Barrett P, Treves A, Shmis T, Ambasz D, Ustinova M. The impact of school infrastructure on learning: A synthesis of the evidence. Impact Sch Infrastruct Learn A Synth Evid; 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1378-8

Siswanto E, Hidayati D. Management indicators of good infrastructure facilities to improve school quality. Int J Educ Manag Innov. 2020;1(1):69–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/ijemi.v1i1.1516

Barteit S, Guzek D, Jahn A, Bärnighausen T, Jorge MM, Neuhann F. Evaluation of e-learning for medical education in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Comput Educ. 2020 Feb;145:103726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103726

John EP, Daun-Barnett N, Moronski-Chapman KM. Public policy and higher education: Reframing strategies for preparation, access, and college success. Routledge; 2018. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315622453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315622453

Sulyman AK. Assessing the quality and effectiveness of scholarship programs in Iraq: A study of impact, sustainability, and equity. Mustansiriyah J Humanit. 2023;1(2).

Haleem A, Javaid M, Qadri MA, Suman R. Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustain Oper Comput. 2022;3:275–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004

Marginson S. Higher education, economic inequality and social mobility: Implications for emerging East Asia. Int J Educ Dev. 2018;63:4–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.03.002

Assari S. Health disparities due to diminished return among black Americans: public policy solutions. Soc Issues Policy Rev. 2018;12(1):112–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12042

Bauer JM. The Internet and income inequality: Socio-economic challenges in a hyperconnected society. Telecomm Policy. 2018;42(4):333–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2017.05.009

Sewell SJ, Desai SA, Mutsaa E, Lottering RT. A comparative study of community perceptions regarding the role of roads as a poverty alleviation strategy in rural areas. J Rural Stud. 2019;71:73–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.09.001

Sadrizadeh S, Yao R, Yuan F, Awbi H, Bahnfleth W, Bi Y, et al. Indoor air quality and health in schools: A critical review for developing the roadmap for the future school environment. J Build Eng. 2022;57:104908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104908

Apuke OD, Iyendo TO. University students’ usage of the internet resources for research and learning: Forms of access and perceptions of utility. Heliyon. 2018 Dec;4(12):e01052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e01052

Avolio B, Chávez J, Vílchez-Román C. Factors that contribute to the underrepresentation of women in science careers worldwide: A literature review. Soc Psychol Educ. 2020;23(3):773–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-020-09558-y

Cerrato J, Cifre E. Gender inequality in household chores and work-family conflict. Front Psychol. 2018 Aug;9:1330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01330

SteelFisher GK, Findling MG, Bleich SN, Casey LS, Blendon RJ, Benson JM, et al. Gender discrimination in the United States: Experiences of women. Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec;54(Suppl 2 Suppl 2):1442–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13217

Dahab R, Sakellariou D. Barriers to accessing maternal care in low income countries in Africa: A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun;17(12):4292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124292

Pe na-García N, Gil-Saura I, Rodríguez-Orejuela A, Siqueira-Junior JR. Purchase intention and purchase behavior online: A cross-cultural approach. Heliyon. 2020 Jun;6(6):e04284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04284

Boyette AH, Hewlett BS. Teaching in hunter-gatherers. Rev Philos Psychol. 2018;9(4):771–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-017-0347-2

Bullough A, Guelich U, Manolova TS, Schjoedt L. Women’s entrepreneurship and culture: Gender role expectations and identities, societal culture, and the entrepreneurial environment. Small Bus Econ. 2022;58(2):985–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00429-6

Kioupi V, Voulvoulis N. Education for sustainable development: A systemic framework for connecting the SDGs to educational outcomes. Sustainability (Basel). 2019;11(21):6104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216104

Ma L, Lee CS. Understanding the barriers to the use of MOOCs in a developing country: an innovation resistance perspective. J Educ Comput Res. 2019;57(3):571– 90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118757732

Martzoukou K, Burnett S. Exploring the everyday life information needs and the socio-cultural adaptation barriers of Syrian refugees in Scotland. J Doc. 2018;74(5):1104–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-10-2017-0142

Downloads

Published

2024-11-11

How to Cite

Riyanto, P. ., ., J., Humaid, H. ., Tambaip, B. ., ., S., Asmawi, M. ., & Lubis, J. . (2024). Education and Welfare: The Role of Public Policy in Equalizing Educational Opportunities for the South Papua Generation. KnE Social Sciences, 9(31), 574–588. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i31.17616