Prosocial Behavior of College Students: A Self-determination Perspective

Authors

  • Hanggara Budi Utomo Department of Psychology, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang
  • Ika Andrini Farida Department of Psychology, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang
  • Dwi Retnowati Nursing, STIKES Hutama Abdi Husada, Tulungagung
  • Clay Alcander Marchelius Teguh Department of Psychology, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i30.17516

Abstract

Students’ prosocial behavior refers to self-determination motivation with the aim of helping others and a caring attitude. The purpose of this research study is to explore the role of college students’ prosocial behavior in terms of self-determination. The age of college students is in the early adulthood category. The research approach in this study is to use a qualitative approach with literature study techniques. The result of this study is that the role of students’ prosocial behavior in terms of self-determination is the existence of students’ autonomous interest and motivation to behave prosocially in real terms. Autonomous prosocial motivation is manifested as the regulation of prosocial behavior determined by the individual himself, the interest and pleasure to help others without coercion from others. However, individuals who are motivated to be prosocial because they want to avoid guilt and shame may cause individuals to experience more negative emotions. This study implies that the role of autonomous motivation as part of self-determination theory becomes strong evidence in individuals achieving desired goals, and specifically also evidence of individuals performing highly prosocial behavior.

Keywords: college students, prosocial behavior, self-determination

References

Jensen K. Prosociality. Curr Biol. 2016 Aug;26(16):R748–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.025

Fitria, Utomo, H. B., & Dwiyanti, L. Pembentukan perilaku prososial anak usia dini melalui permainan kooperatif. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. 2020;7(2):123–32.

Hagang LL. Hubungan need for cognition dengan perilaku prososial mahasiswa. Psikoborneo. 2017;5(4):563–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30872/psikoborneo.v5i4.4475

Trianatasya R, Yudiani E, Afifah S. Kecerdasan emosi dan perilaku prososial pada mahasiswa. Indonesian Journal of Behavioral Studies. 2021;1(2):196–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19109/ijobs.v1i2.9284

Iskandar A. Dampak penggunaan media video youtube terhadap perilaku prososial mahasiswa PGMI IAIN. SAG. EDUCATOR : Directory of Elementary Education Journal. 2023;4(1):1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58176/edu.v4i1.580

Carlo G, White RM, Streit C, Knight GP, Zeiders KH. Longitudinal relations among parenting styles, prosocial behaviors, and academic outcomes in U.S. Mexican Adolescents. Child Dev. 2018 Mar;89(2):577–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12761

Memmott-Elison MK, Yu M, Maiya S, Dicus JL, Carlo G, Maiya S, et al. Relations between stress, coping strategies, and prosocial behavior in U.S. Mexican college students. J Am Coll Health. 2022;70(6):1644–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2020.1817035

Tendhar T, de Mesquita PB. Compassion education for prosocial behavior and well-being among college students. J Ment Health Soc Behav. 2020;2(1):115–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33790/jmhsb1100115

Utomo HB, Khan RI. Gaya pengasuhan berdasar determinasi diri. In: Bawono Y, Rohmah N, Qorrin R, editors. Psikologi Parenting. 1st ed. Bintang Semesta Media; 2021. pp. 17–27.

Xue S, Kaufman MR, Zhang X, Xia S, Niu C, Zhou R, et al. Resilience and prosocial behavior among chinese university students during covid-19 Mitigation: testing mediation and moderation models of social support. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Jun;15( June):1531–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S364356

Kidron Y, Fleischman S. Promoting adolescents’ prosocial behavior. Educ Leadersh. 2006;63(7):90–1.

Ryan R, Deci E. Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806

Bayar Y, Sayil M, Tepe YK. The relationship of autonomous motivation to prosocial behavior: mediator role of prosocial friends and friendship quality among Turkish adolescents. Research on Education and Psychology. 2020;41(1):98–113.

Peetz J, Milyavskaya M. A self-determination theory approach to predicting daily prosocial behavior. Motiv Emot. 2021;45(5):617–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-021-09902-5

Lay J, Hoppmann C. (2015). Altruism and Prosocial Behaviour. Encyclopedia of Geropsychology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-080-3_69-1

Wentzel K. Prosocial Behaviour and Schooling. In: Tremblay RE, Boivin M, Peters R, editors. A. Knafo-Noam. 2015. pp. 1–7.

Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press; 1985. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7

Hurlock E. (2011). Psikologi perkembangan: Suatu pendekatan sepanjang rentang kehidupan. (Istiwidayati (ed.)). Erlangga.

Dewi EK, Rusmawati D, Santosa TT. (2023). The relationship between gender, age, and prosocial behavior in college students. Proceedings of International Conference on Psychological Studies (ICPsyche), 4(1), 87–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58959/icpsyche.v4i1.27

Barbayannis G, Bandari M, Zheng X, Baquerizo H, Pecor KW, Ming X. Academic stress and mental well-being in college students: Correlations, affected groups, and COVID-19. Front Psychol. 2022 May;13:886344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.886344

Pascoe MC, Hetrick SE, Parker AG. The impact of stress on students in secondary school and highereducation. Int J Adolesc Youth. 2020;25(1):104–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2019.1596823

Passarelli TO, Buchanan TW. How do stress and social closeness impact prosocial behavior? Exp Psychol. 2020 Mar;67(2):123–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000482

Zhang H, Zhao H. Influence of urban residents’ life satisfaction on prosocial behavioral intentions in the community: A multiple mediation model. J Community Psychol. 2021 Mar;49(2):406–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22467

Hardy SA, Dollahite DC, Johnson N, Christensen JB. Adolescent motivations to engage in pro-social behaviors and abstain from health-risk behaviors: A selfdetermination theory approach. J Pers. 2015 Oct;83(5):479–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12123

Ryan R, Deci E. Brick by brick: The origins, development, and future of selfdetermination theory. In: Elliot A, editor. Advances in motivation science. Elsevier; 2019. pp. 111–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2019.01.001

Collie R. Motivation theory and its yields for promoting students’ social and emotional competence. In: Yoder N, Skoog-Hofman A, editors. Motivating the SEL feld forward through equity. Advances in motivation and achievement. Volume 21. Emerald Publishing; 2021. pp. 41–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S0749-742320210000021004

Collie RJ. Social-emotional need satisfaction, prosocial motivation, and students’ positive behavioral and well-being outcomes. Soc Psychol Educ. 2022;25(2-3):399– 424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09691-w

Downloads

Published

2024-11-08

How to Cite

Utomo, H. B., Farida, I. A., Retnowati, D., & Teguh, C. A. M. (2024). Prosocial Behavior of College Students: A Self-determination Perspective. KnE Social Sciences, 9(30), 164–170. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i30.17516