The Influence of Situational Leadership on Organizational Performance Through Organizational Change in the Hospitality Industry in Southern Kalimantan

Authors

  • Dewi Damayanti Said University of Merdeka Malang, Malang
  • Boge Triatmanto University of Merdeka Malang, Malang https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5525-9464
  • Sunardi ‎ University of Merdeka Malang, Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i28.17203

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the influence of situational leadership, organizational change, and organizational performance in the hospitality industry. A quantitative method is used to analyse data from a total population of 222 three- and four-star hotel management professionals in South Kalimantan Province. The data collection method was a census, to ensure the adequacy of the unit of analysis. The data analysis technique uses SEM Amos to jointly analyze the influence of situational leadership and organizational change on performance. The results of this study were that empirically, leadership’s ability to give orders to hotel employees is the most decisive attitude in situational leadership, especially in terms of supervising its members in the settlement process. Moreover, readiness to change as a belief and attitude that must be carried out has the highest contribution value in organizational change. From an organizational performance organizational performance, at star hotels in South Kalimantan, the most decisive indicator is positive feedback from hotel guests regarding the product or service experience used. Organizational change is able to mediate the influence of situational leadership on organizational performance.

Keywords: situational leadership, organizational change, hotels performance

References

Kaasinen E, Schmalfuß F, Özturk C, Aromaa S, Boubekeur M, Heilala J, et al. Empowering and engaging industrial workers with Operator 4.0 solutions. Comput Ind Eng. 2020 Jan;139:105678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.01.052

Werner JM, DeSimone RL, Werner JM, DeSimone RL. Human resource development. 2012.

Kożusznik B. Deinfluentization and self‐monitoring as influence regulation tactics of Polish women and men managers. Women Manage Rev. 2006 Feb;21(2):131–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420610650701

Thompson G, Glasø L. Situational leadership theory: A test from a leader-follower congruence approach. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2018 Jun;39(5):574–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-01-2018-0050

Yeo RK. Get ready to shift: Situational positioning of leadership identity and influence. Organ Dyn. 2020 Apr;49(2):100688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2018.11.001

Peus C, Braun S, Frey D. Situation-based measurement of the full range of leadership model—Development and validation of a situational judgment test. Leadersh Q. 2013 Oct;24(5):777–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.07.006

Triatmanto B, Wahyuni N, Respati H. Continual human resources empowerment through human capital and commitment for the organizational performance in hospitality industry. Qual Access Success. 2019;20(173):84–91.

Stewart DE, Das V, Seibold M. Birth and empowerment: A qualitative study of the childbirth experience of Filipino migrant women in Brisbane, Australia. Asia Pac J Public Health. 1998 Apr;10(2):64–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/101053959801000202

Giokas AE, Antonakas NP. Culture changing: A development and empirical exploration in the Greek tax administration. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2013 Feb;73:573–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.02.093

Holbeche LS. Organizational effectiveness and agility. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance. 2018 Oct;5(4):302–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-07-2018-0044

Wahyuni N, Triatmanto B. The effect of the organizational change on company performance mediated by changes in management accounting practices. Accounting. 2020 Apr;6:581–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2020.4.002

Mazzanti M, Pini P, Tortia E. Organizational innovations, human resources and firm performance: The Emilia-Romagna food sector. J Socio-Economics. 2006 Feb;35(1):123–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2005.12.007

E. Ris, Mof, Ran, “Sudah 1 . 438 Karyawan Hotel Dirumahkan, Pengamat : Ekonomi Kalsel akan Cepat Bangkit,” Prokol, no. April, 2020.

Hoffman RC, Shipper FM. Shared core values of high performing employee-owned enterprises. J Manag Spiritual Relig. 2018 Aug;15(4):285–304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2018.1482474

Joiner TA, Sarah Yang Spencer X, Salmon S. The effectiveness of flexible manufacturing strategies: The mediating role of performance measurement systems. Int J Prod Perform Manag. 2009 Jan;58(2):119–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400910928725

Shah TA, Khattak MN, Zolin R, Shah SZ. Psychological empowerment and employee attitudinal outcomes: The pivotal role of psychological capital. Manag Res Rev. 2019 Jul;42(7):797–817. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-05-2018-0194

Leung M, Shan Y, Chan I, Dongyu C. Engineering, construction and architectural management article information. Eng Construct Architect Manag. 2011;18(3):312–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981111126205

Sisaye S. Process innovation and adaptive institutional change strategies in management control systems: Activity based costing as administrative innovation. Advances in Management Accounting. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2003 May 6. pp. 251–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-7871(02)11011-2

Minbaeva DB. Strategic HRM in building micro-foundations of organizational knowledge-based performance. Hum Resour Manage Rev. 2013 Dec;23(4):378–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2012.10.001

Robalo R. Explanations for the gap between management accounting rules and routines: An institutional approach: Explicaciones para la brecha entre las normas de contabilidad de gestión y las rutinas: un planteamiento institucional. Rev Contab. 2014 Jan;17(1):88–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsar.2014.03.002

Ghena AT, Abub NZ, Sazalic KH, Belkhamzad Z. The effect of empowerment and teamwork on employee productivity. Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang. 2019;6(4):377–86.

Kotter JP. Building strategic agility for a faster moving world. Harvard Business Review Press; 2014.

Kasali R. Agility bukan singa yang mengembik: Transformasi dalam sunyi untuk meraih ketangkasan. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama; 2014.

Alsharari NM. Multilevel institutional analysis of accounting change in public management. Int J Organ Anal. 2018 Mar;26(1):91–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-05-2017-1161

Vears DF, D’Abramo F. Health, wealth and behavioural change: An exploration of role responsibilities in the wake of epigenetics. J Community Genet. 2018 Apr;9(2):153– 67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-017-0315-7

Englund H, Gerdin J. Management accounting and the paradox of embedded agency: A framework for analyzing sources of structural change. Manage Account Res. 2018 Mar;38:1–1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2017.12.001

Alsharari NM. Management accounting and organizational change: alternative perspectives. Int J Organ Anal. 2019 Sep;27(4):1124–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-03-2018-1394

Oakland JS, Tanner SJ. A new framework for managing change. TQM Mag. 2007 Oct;19(6):572–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09544780710828421

Thompson G, Vecchio RP. Situational leadership theory: A test of three versions. Leadersh Q. 2009 Oct;20(5):837–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.06.014

Mobarez AA. The effect of green human resource management on organization’s sustainable environmental performance’. Journal of the Association of Arab Universities for Basic and Applied Sciences. 2018.

Zaccaro SJ, Green JP, Dubrow S, Kolze M. Leader individual differences, situational parameters, and leadership outcomes: A comprehensive review and integration. Leadersh Q. 2018 Feb;29(1):2–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.10.003

Banjar K. “Update, 14 Hotel di Kalsel Tutup Dirumahkan,” p. 2020, 2020.

Sanusi A. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis. Jakarta: Salemba Empat; 2016.

Kuncoro W, Wibowo G. The increase of organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB) through islamic work ethics, affective commitment, and organizational identity. Int Bus Res. 2019 Jan;12(2):181–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v12n2p181

Silverthorne C. Situational leadership theory in Taiwan: A different culture perspective. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2000 Mar;21(2):68–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730010318156

Downloads

Published

2024-10-10

How to Cite

Said, D. D., Triatmanto, B., & ‎ , S. (2024). The Influence of Situational Leadership on Organizational Performance Through Organizational Change in the Hospitality Industry in Southern Kalimantan. KnE Social Sciences, 9(28), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i28.17203