Bibliometric Analysis: Publication Trends of Forest and Land Fire Policy 1969-2024
Abstract
This study aims to analyze publication trends related to the themes of Butane and land fire policies indexed in the Scopus database from 1969 to 2024. Journal articles in the field of forest and land fire policy published between 1969 and 2024 are traced from the Scopus database using the keywords “Forest Fires” OR “Land Fires” AND “Policy”. This study uses analysis of publication trends forest and land fire policy, most productive countries and most productive organizations, co-authorship, co- and citation. Research on forest and land fire policy is widely conducted around the world. This is because many problems must be solved by multistakeholders. Publications in 2022 became the most productive year with 215 publications. The United States and Spain are the two countries that are most productive in producing publications related to forest and land fire policies. The network of co-authorship based on documents is Stephens, SL being the most common. Co-Occurrence networks for Author Keywords include forest fires, deforestation, forest management, wildfire, remote sensing, wildfires, landsat, protected areas. Bibliometric methods can be used to analyze publication trends related to “forest and land fire policy”. However, it needs the support of datasets and a complete computing system. The results of the analysis of forest and land fire policy articles show an increase in publication trends related to forest and land fire policies.
Keywords: bibliometric analysis, policy implementation, land fires, forest
References
[1] Zacharakis I, Tsihrintzis VA. Environmental Forest Fire Danger Rating Systems and Indices around the Globe: A Review. Land (Basel). 2023;12(1):194.
[2] Asteriniah F, Sutina S. Implementation of forest and peatland fire control policy in ogan komering ilir. Journal of Abdimas Mandiri. 2018;1(2): https://doi.org/10.36982/jam.v1i2.338.
[3] Zhou Q, Zhang H, Wu Z. Effects of Forest Fire Prevention Policies on Probability and Drivers of Forest Fires in the Boreal Forests of China during Different Periods. Remote Sens (Basel). 2022;14(22):5724.
[4] Solikhan, M. (2016). Reformulation of forest fire suppression policies in indonesia. The indonesian journal of public administration (ijpa); vol 2, no 2 (2016): indonesian journal of public administration (ijpa) | juli - desember 2016 ;
[5] Kala CP. Environmental and socioeconomic impacts of forest fires: A call for multilateral cooperation and management interventions. Nat Hazards Rev. 2023;3(2):286–94.
[6] Yusuf A, Hapsoh H, Siregar SH, Nurrochmat DR. Analysis of forest and land fires in Riau Province. Environmental Dynamics of Indonesia. 2019 Jul;6(2):67.
[7] Nasi R, Dennis R, Meijaard E, Applegate G, Moore P. Forest fire and biological diversity. Unasylva. 2002;53:.
[8] Doerr, S. H., & Santín, C. (2016). Global trends in wildfire and its impacts: perceptions versus realities in a changing world. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1696), 20150345. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0345.
[9] Alkhatib AA. A Review on Forest Fire Detection Techniques. Int J Distrib Sens Netw. 2014;10(3):597368.
[10] Purnomo A, Usman I, Asitah N. Entrepreneurship Research In Indonesia : Publication Mapping With Scientometric Perspective (1972-2019). AdBispreneur : Journal of Business Administration and Entrepreneurship Thought and Research. 2019;4(3):207–16. DOI