Economics of Happiness: What Really Counts?

Abstract

The study of happiness was initially examined psychologically, then expanded to incorporate social and, finally, economic aspects to investigate the reasons for the disparities in happiness levels across countries. Numerous scholars from various fields of expertise have developed an interest in studying happiness as a topic, as it has become a global issue. The notable work of Easterlin known as “Easterlin Paradox” postulates that happiness varies linearly with income at a point in time, both within and across nations. However, the long-term growth rates of happiness and income are not significantly linked. The economics of happiness is a multidisciplinary study of the relationship between economic conditions and subjective well-being or happiness. Happiness economics can be examined from both a microeconomic and macroeconomic perspective, providing valuable insights into both individual well-being and societal gain. The economics of happiness has received a lot of attention recently, especially in terms of understanding the differences in life satisfaction between rich and developing countries. Wealthier countries are happier as a group than poorer countries; happiness seems to increase with wealth up to a limit, but not beyond it. Public policy has a substantial impact on happiness economics by changing the well-being of individuals and society through numerous mechanisms such as fiscal policy, public spending, health impact assessment, and family assistance. The expanding national emphasis on subjective well-being accentuates the need to include happiness in governmental decisions.


Keywords: happiness, subjective well-being, Easterlin Paradox

References
[1] D. Sgroi, T. Hills, G. O’Donnell, A. Oswald, and E. Proto, “Understanding Happiness: A CAGE Policy Report,” 2017. doi: 10.1093/mind/XCIII.372.589.

[2] R. A. Easterlin, A. M. Laura, A. Mcvey, M. Switek, O. Sawangfa, and J. S. Zweig, “The Happiness-Income Paradox Revisited,” in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011, pp. 22463–22468. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015962107.

[3] M. Membiela-Pollán, M. Alló, C. Pateiro-Rodríguez, and F. Blázquez-Lozano, “The inefficiency of the neoclassical paradigm in the promotion of subjective well-being and socioeconomic, and environmental sustainability: An empirical test for the Spanish case,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 24, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11247102.

[4] B. Stevenson and J. Wolfers, “Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin paradox,” Brookings Pap. Econ. Act., no. SPRING, pp. 1–87, 2008, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1273524.

[5] P. Zhang, “Happiness inequality has a Kuznets-style relation with economic growth in China,” Sci. Rep., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19881-3.

[6] Z. Ouyang, F. Liu, G. Zhai, and S. Bilan, “Assessment of resident happiness under uncertainty of economic policies: Empirical evidences from china,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 18, pp. 1–17, 2020, doi: 10.3390/SU12187296.

[7] P. Kumari, N., Sahu, N., Sahoo, D., & Kumar, “Impact of socioeconomic conditions on happiness: evidence from emerging market economies.,” J. Public Aff. 22(S1)., 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2782.

[8] A. Deaton, “the World : Evidence from the Gallup,” J. Econ. Perspect., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 53–72, 2008.

[9] S. Frey, Bruno and A. Stutzer, “What Can Economists Learn from Happiness Research?,” J. Econ. Lit., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 402–435, 2002, doi: 10.1257/002205102320161320.

[10] A. Carabelli and M. Cedrini, “The Economic Problem of Happiness: Keynes on Happiness and Economics,” Forum Soc. Econ., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 335–359, 2011, doi: 10.1007/s12143-010-9085-2.

[11] R. Layard, Happiness: Lessons from a New Science, vol. 84, no. 6. 2005. doi: 10.2307/20031793.

[12] A. Berkey, L., Frey, B., & Stutzer, “Happiness and economics: how the economy and institutions affect human well-being,” Contemp. Sociol. a J. Rev., vol. 32, no. 2, 2003.

[13] A. Clunies-Ross, “Happiness and economics: how the economy and institutions affect human well-being.,” J. Econ. Stud., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 449–453, 2002, doi: 10.1108/jes.2002.29.6.449.2.

[14] A. Steptoe, A. Deaton, and A. A. Stone, “Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing,” Lancet, vol. 385, no. 9968, pp. 640–648, 2015, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61489-0.

[15] E. Diener, M. E. Suh, E. R. Lucas, and L. H. Smith, “Sunbjective Well-Being: Three Decades of Progress,” Psychol. Bull., vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 276–302, 1999, doi: 10.1006/pupt.1998.0157.

[16] R. Inglehart, R. Foa, C. Peterson, and C. Welzel, “Perspectives on Psychological Science Rising Happiness,” 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00078.x.

[17] A. İ. Akgun, S. P. Türkoğlu, and S. Erikli, “Investigating the determinants of happiness index in EU-27 countries: a quantile regression approach,” Int. J. Sociol. Soc. Policy, vol. 43, no. 1–2, pp. 156–177, 2023, doi: 10.1108/IJSSP-01-2022-0005.

[18] A. Chia, M. L. Kern, and B. A. Neville, “CSR for Happiness: Corporate determinants of societal happiness as social responsibility,” Bus. Ethics, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 422–437, 2020, doi: 10.1111/beer.12274.

[19] L. Green, K. Ashton, S. Azam, M. Dyakova, T. Clemens, and M. A. Bellis, “Using health impact assessment (HIA) to understand the wider health and well-being implications of policy decisions: the COVID-19 ‘staying at home and social distancing policy’ in Wales,” BMC Public Health, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s12889-021- 11480-7.

[20] E. Diener, “Guidelines for National Indicators of Subjective Well-Being and Ill-Being,” J. Happiness Stud., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 397–404, 2006, doi: 10.1007/s10902-006-9000- y.

[21] A. Levinson, “Happiness, Behavorial Economics and Public Policy,” Cambridge, 2013.

[22] R. Veenhoven, “The Origins of Happiness: The Science of Well-Being over the Life Course,” Contemp. Sociol. A J. Rev., vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 406–408, 2019, doi: 10.1177/0094306119853809g.

[23] A. Cabrera, C. García-Pérez, S. Panadero, and J. J. Vázquez, “Determining factors in the overall happiness and outlook for the future of women living homeless: Evidence from Madrid, Spain,” J. Community Psychol., vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 2163–2179, 2023, doi: 10.1002/jcop.23018.

[24] M. A. Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, “Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and other puzzles.,” J. Econ. Lit., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 95–144, 2008.

[25] R. Layard, “Human Satisfactions and Public Policy,” Econ. J., vol. 90, no. 360, pp. 737–750, 1980.

[26] S. Ali, S. M. Murshed, and E. Papyrakis, “Happiness and the Resource Curse,” J. Happiness Stud., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 437–464, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10902-019-00080- 3.

[27] D. X. Bui and K. T. Pham, “Aristotle’s philosophy on happiness and its meaning to educate Vietnamese today,” Perspekt. Nauk. i Obraz., vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 475–490, 2022, doi: 10.32744/pse.2022.6.28.

[28] A. van Hoorn and E. M. Sent, “Consumer Capital as the Source of Happiness: The Missing Economic Theory Underlying the Income-Happiness Paradox,” J. Econ. Issues, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 984–1002, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1080/00213624.2016.1249746.

[29] E. Proto and A. J. Oswald, “National Happiness and Genetic Distance: A Cautious Exploration,” Econ. J., vol. 127, no. 604, pp. 2127–2152, 2017, doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12383.

[30] D. Lubian and L. Zarri, “Happiness and tax morale: An empirical analysis,” J. Econ. Behav. Organ., vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 223–243, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.03.009.

[31] C. Woo, “Good governance and happiness: does technical quality of governance lead to happiness universally in both rich and poor countries?,” J. Int. Area Stud., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 37–56, 2018.

[32] J. Hudson, “Institutional trust and subjective well-being across the EU,” Kyklos, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 43–62, 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6435.2006.00319.x.

[33] M. Tavits, “Representation, corruption, and subjective well-being,” Comp. Polit. Stud., vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 1607–1630, 2008, doi: 10.1177/0010414007308537.

[34] C. Graham, The Economics of Happiness. Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics. 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_177-1.

[35] M. Kim, “Theoretical and empirical examinations of happiness in Korea,” Dev. Soc., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 189–207, 2016, doi: 10.21588/dns/2016.45.1.008.

[36] R. J. Shiller, “Why Do People Dislike Inflation?,” in Reducing Inflation: Motivation and Strategy, NBER, 1997, pp. 13–70. doi: 10.20955/es.2010.15.

[37] R. Di Di Tella, R. J. Macculloch, and A. J. Oswald, “The Macroeconomics of Happiness,” 2001.

[38] R. Di Tella and R. . Macculloch, “Gross national happiness as an answer to the Easterlin Paradox?,” J. Dev. Econ., vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 22–42, 2008.

[39] Z. Hessami, “Globalization’s winners and losers—Evidence from life satisfaction data, 1975–2001.,” Econ. Lett., vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 250–253, 2011.

[40] R. Ovaska, T., & Takashima, “Economic policy and the Level of self-perceived wellbeing: An international comparison.,” J. Socio. Econ., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 308–325, 2006.

[41] A. Ferrer-i-Carbonell and J. M. Gowdy, “Environmental degradation and happiness,” Ecol. Econ., vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 509–516, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.005.

[42] Z. Li, H. Folmer, and J. Xue, “To what extent does air pollution affect happiness? The case of the Jinchuan mining area, China,” Ecol. Econ., vol. 99, pp. 88–99, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.12.014.

[43] S. Ferreira et al., “Life satisfaction and air quality in Europe,” Ecol. Econ., vol. 88, pp. 1–10, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.027.

[44] N. Aral and H. Bakir, “A spatial analysis of happiness,” Panoeconomicus, vol. 71, no. 00, pp. 22–22, 2022, doi: 10.2298/pan191220022a.

[45] K. O. Shin, N. G. Yeom, and H. S. Park, “Customer happiness and open innovation in the esthetics education for the elderly generation,” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1–13, 2019, doi: 10.3390/joitmc5040086.

[46] E. Núñez-Barriopedro, R. Ravina-Ripoll, and E. Ahumada-Tello, “Happiness perception in Spain, a SEM approach to evidence from the sociological research center,” Qual. Quant., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 761–779, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11135-019-00955-w.

[47] D. M. Lestari, A. Muslim, R. Furwanti, and I. Solikhin, “Do Poverty and Human Development Index Influence Happiness? Evidence from Indonesia through Islamic Studies Approach,” el-Jizya J. Ekon. Islam, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 21–32, 2022, doi: 10.24090/ej.v10i1.6017.

[48] N. Pontarollo, M. Orellana, and J. Segovia, “The Determinants of Subjective Well- Being in a Developing Country: The Ecuadorian Case,” J. Happiness Stud., vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 3007–3035, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10902-019-00211-w.

[49] A. K. Tiwari and M. Mutascu, “The relationship between environmental degradation and happiness in 23 developed contemporary economies,” Manag. Environ. Qual. An Int. J., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 301–321, 2015, doi: 10.1108/MEQ-05-2014-0077.

[50] C. Lenzi and G. Perucca, “The nexus between innovation and wellbeing across the EU space: What role for urbanisation?,” Urban Stud., vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 323–349, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0042098018818947.

[51] R. Layard, “Happiness and public policy: A challenge to the profession,” Econ. J., vol. 116, no. 510, pp. 24–33, 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01073.x.

[52] J. F. Helliwell, “Well-Being, Social Capital and Public Policy: What’s New?,” Cambridge, 2005.

[53] S. Oishi and E. Diener, “Can and Should Happiness Be a Policy Goal?,” Policy Insights from Behav. Brain Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 195–203, 2014, doi: 10.1177/2372732214548427.

[54] L. Rangiwhetu, N. Pierse, E. Chisholm, and P. Howden-Chapman, “Public Housing and Well-Being: Evaluation Frameworks to Influence Policy,” Heal. Educ. Behav., vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 825–835, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1090198120917095.

[55] X. Zhao and Z. Sun, “The effect of satisfaction with environmental performance on subjective well-being in China: GDP as a moderating factor,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 5, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12051745.

[56] A. Alesina, R. Di Tella, and R. MacCulloch, “Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different?,” J. Public Econ., vol. 88, no. 9–10, pp. 2009–2042, 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.07.006.