The Contribution of Basic Accounting Qualification in Producing Job-Ready Workforce
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i14.16115Abstract
The quality of contemporary accounting graduates has often been touted as failing to meet the requirements of the dynamically changing accountancy profession. In particular, the ability of accountancy programs to produce competent accounting graduates has been highly debated by researchers and academicians over the past decade. This paper aims to expand the extant literature on accounting education by evaluating the degree of the contemporary relevance of the Certified Accounting Technician (CAT) program’s syllabus structure in producing job-ready accounting graduates, as well as analyzing the credibility of the CAT program through the lens of various stakeholders, within the Malaysian context. The relatively static nature of the CAT program’s syllabus structure over the past six years lent itself as the motive for undertaking this study. The data samples of the study comprise CAT students, graduates, lecturers, industry practitioners, and the Malaysian chapter of the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA). Results from the study indicate that CAT students are technically adept but lack practical proficiency, and that there is scope to improve the credibility of the CAT program among Malaysian accounting employers.
Keywords: CAT, job-ready, accounting graduates
References
Tempone I, Kavanagh M, Segal N, Hancock P, Howieson B, Kent J. Desirable generic attributes for accounting graduates into the twenty-first century. Accounting Research Journal. 2012;25(1):41–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10309611211244519
Tan L, Fawzi L. Employability skills required of accountants. In: The 17th Asian Academic Accounting Association Annual Conference (Foura) 2016. Sarawak: Kuching, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173406001
Kermis G, Kermis M. Professional presence and soft skills: A role for accounting education. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies. 2010;2:1–10.
Awayiga J, Onumah J, Tsamenyi M. Knowledge and skills development of accounting graduates: The perceptions of graduates and employers in Ghana’. Account Educ. 2010;19(1–2):139–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09639280902903523
Bui B, Porter B. The expectation-performance gap in accounting education: an exploratory study. Account Educ. 2010;19(1–2):23–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09639280902875556
Abayadeera N, Watty K. The expectation-performance gap in generic skills in accounting graduates. Asian Rev Account. 2014;22(1):56–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-09-2013-0059
Low M, Botes V, Dela Rue D, et al. Accounting employers’ expectations - The ideal accounting graduates. E J Bus Educ Scholarsh Teach. 2016;10:36–57.
Kassim C. Accounting education change: Improving the quality of accounting graduates. J Appl Environ Biol Sci. 2014;4:1–7.
Chu S, Man H. History of accounting education. J High Educ Theory Pract. 2012;12:119–128.
AAA. Future accounting education: Preparing for the expanding profession. Issues Account Educ. 1986;1:168–195.
International Accounting Education Standards Board. International Education Standard 3. Initial Professional Development-Professional Skills (Revised).
Arthur Andersen & Co. Arthur Young, Coopers & Lybrand, et al. Perspectives on education: capabilities for success in the accounting profession. London; 1989.
American Education Change Commission. Objectives of education for accountants: Position statement number one. Issues Account Educ. 2019;5:307–312.
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). CPA vision project- 2011 and beyond. 1998.
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). CPA Horizons 2025 Report. 2011.
ACCA. Professional accountants - The future: Drivers of change and future skills. London; 2016.
Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
Lent R, Brown S, Hackett G. Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice and performance. J Vocat Behav. 1994;45(1):79–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
Prikshat VN. DS. Conceptualizing graduate work-readiness: Theories. Singapore: Concepts And Implications For Practice And Research; 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0974-8_2
AAA. Focusing accounting curricula on students’ long-run careers: Recommendations for an integrated competency-based framework for accounting education. Issues In Accounting Education; 29.
Sunder S. Adverse effects of uniform written reporting standards on accounting practice, education and research. J Account Public Policy. 2010;29(2):99–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2009.10.011
Stoner G, Milner M. Embedding generic employability skills in an accounting degree: development and impediments. Account Educ. 2010;19(1-2):123–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09639280902888229
Siriwardane H, Durden C. The communication skills of accountants: What we know and the gap in our knowledge. Account Educ. 2014;23(2):119–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2013.847329
Milner M, Hill W. Examining the skills debate in Scotland. Int J Manag Educ. 2008;6:13–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3794/ijme.63.140
Low M, Samkin G, Liu C. Accounting education and the provision of soft skills: Implications of the recent nzica CA academic requirement changes’. E J Bus Educ Scholarsh Teach. 2013;7:1–33.
Siriwardane H, Low K, Blietz D. Making entry-level accountants better communicators: A Singapore-based study of communication tasks, skills and attributes. J Account Educ. 2015;33(4):332–347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2015.08.001
Jackling B, Watty K. Generic skills. Account Educ. 2010;19(1-2):1–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09639280902875549
Saunders M, Lewis P. Doing research, business and management. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2017.
Nassaji H. Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Lang Teach Res. 2015;19(2):129–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747
Gray D. Doing research. The real world. 3rd ed. London: Sage; 2014.
Performance Management and Delivery Unit (PEMANDU). Economic Transformation Programme Annual Report 2013. Kuala Lumpur; 2014.
Sunway College. Professional accounting programmes. Sunway College; 2020.
Malina M, Nørreklit H, Selto F. Lessons learned: Advantages and disadvantages of mixed method research. Qual Res Account Manag. 2011;8(1):59–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/11766091111124702
Lelkes Y, Weiss R. Much ado about acquiescence: The relative validity and reliability of construct-specific and agree-disagree questions. Research & Politics. 2015;2(3):1– 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015604173
Nahm FS. Nonparametric statistical tests for the continuous data: the basic concept and the practical use. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2016;69(1):8–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2016.69.1.8
Nowell L, Norris J, White D, Moules NJ. Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16(1):1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Sousa F. Metatheories in research: Positivism, postmodernism and critical realism. In: Woodside A, editor. Organizational culture, business-to-business relationships, and interfirm networks. Bingley: Emerald; 2010. pp. 455–503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1069-0964(2010)0000016012
Goldkuhl G. Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research. Eur J Inf Syst. 2012;21(2):135–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2011.54
Gill J, Johnson P. Research methods for managers. 4th ed. London: Sage; 2010.
Easton G. Critical realism in case study research. Ind Mark Manage. 2010;39(1):118– 128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.06.004
Chowdhury M. Interpretivism in aiding our understanding of the contemporary social world. Open J Philos. 2014;4(3):432–438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2014.43047
Chen YY, Shek DT, Bu FF. Applications of interpretive and constructionist research methods in adolescent research: philosophy, principles and examples. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2011;23(2):129–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh.2011.022
