Download fulltext HTML
Herman‎., Kaniawati, I., Setiawan, A., & Rusdiana, D. (2024). Bibliometric Computational Mapping Analysis of Publications on Science Process Skill Using VOSviewer. KnE Social Sciences, 9(13), 1170–1186. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i13.16058

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i13.16058

statistics

  • 45 Abstract Views
  • 39 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • ‎ Herman

    ‎ Herman

    Study Program of Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi No. 229, 40154
    https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4741-3737
  • Ida Kaniawati

    Ida Kaniawati

    Study Program of Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi No. 229, 40154
    https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2787-7892
  • Agus Setiawan

    Agus Setiawan

    Department of Mechanical Engineering Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi No. 229, 40154
  • Dadi Rusdiana

    Dadi Rusdiana

    Department of Physics, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi No. 229, 40154
    https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1172-1730

Published Date

  • Apr 26, 2024

Bibliometric Computational Mapping Analysis of Publications on Science Process Skill Using VOSviewer

KnE Social Sciences / International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (ICMScE 2022): Learning Models and Teaching Approaches / Pages 1170–1186

Abstract

This study examines the development of “science process skill” research through a bibliometric approach to computational mapping analysis using VOSviewer. The article data was obtained from the Google Scholar database using the publish or perish reference manager application. The title and abstract of the article are used to guide the search process by referring to the keyword “science process skill”. Nine hundred sixty-seven articles were found that were considered relevant. The study period used as the study material is the Google Scholar-indexed article for the last six years (2018 to 2023). The results showed that science process skill research can be separated into 3 terms: science process skill, process skill, and science process. The first term is “science process skill” that is included in cluster 1, which has 71 links, a total strength of 4342 links, and 888 occurrences. The second term is “process science”. This term is included in cluster 4, which has 61 links, a total link strength of 278, and 47 occurrences. The third term is “process skill”. This term is included in cluster 3, which has 67 links, a total link strength of 570, and 100 occurrences. There was an increase in the number of publications from 2018 to 2021. However, it experienced a decline in 2022 up to July 2023. This indicates a decreasing trend in the number of publications in research on science process skills in the last three years, from 2021 to 2023. The results show that research related to science process skills still has a high enough opportunity to be researched. Several keywords related to “science process skills” have not been or are rarely used in research, some of which are an integration of learning models, prospective teachers/pre-service teachers, mixed methods research, assessment of learning, assessment as learning, and assessment for learning. This review can serve as a starting point for research related to other materials.


Keywords: bibliometric, computational mapping, science process skill, VOSviewer

References
[1] Adlaon MS, Ercillo BJ. Psychology behind Elementary Educators’ ‘Science Process Skills,’. Journal for ReAttach Therapy and Developmental Diversities. 2023;6(7):37– 46.

[2] Kemdikbud, Permendikbud Nomor 103 Tahun 2014 tentang Pembelajaran pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah., 2014.

[3] Rieckmann M. “Learning to transform the world: Key competencies in Education for Sustainable Development.,” Issues and trends in education for sustainable development. vol. 39, pp. 39–59, 2018.

[4] Hajkowicz S, Sanderson C, Karimi S, Bratanova A, Naughtin C. “Artificial intelligence adoption in the physical sciences, natural sciences, life sciences, social sciences, and the arts and humanities: A bibliometric analysis of research publications from 1960-2021.,” Technology in Society. vol. 74, p. 2023.

[5] Kaban A. Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Science Mapping Approach. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology. 2023;11(4):844–61.

[6] Irwanto I, Saputro AD, Widiyanti W, Laksana SD. Global Trends on Mobile Learning in Higher Education: A Bibliometric Analysis (2002–2022). Int J Inf Educ Technol. 2023;13(2):373–83.

[7] Irwanto I, Wahyudiati D, Saputro AD, Lukman IR. Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) in Higher Education: A Bibliometric Analysis (2012-2022). Int J Inf Educ Technol. 2023;13(2):223–31.

[8] Zhang M, Xiao G. A Bibliometric Analysis of Online Learning Emotions from 2006 to 2023. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2023;18(13):220–33.

[9] Dehnad A, Abdekhoda M. Mapping the Publications of e-learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Scientometric Research. 2023;12(1):35–43.

[10] Ali M, Tse AW. Research Trends and Issues of Engineering Design Process for STEM Education in K-12: A Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology. 2023;11(3):695–727.

[11] N.L. Phuong, L.T.T. Hien, N.Q. Linh et al., “Implementation of STEM education: A bibliometrics analysis from case study research in Scopus database.,” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. vol. 19, no. 6, p. 2023. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13216.

[12] Prahani BK, Dawana IR, Jatmiko B, Amelia T. Research Trend of Big Data in Education During the Last 10 Years. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2023;18(10):39–64.

[13] H.T. Pham, T.C. Vu, L.T. Nguyen, et al., “Professional development for science teachers: A bibliometric analysis from 2001 to 2021.,” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. vol. 19, no. 5, p. 2023. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13153.

[14] Zakaria H, Kamarudin D, Fauzi MA, Wider W. “Mapping the helix model of innovation influence on education: A bibliometric review.,” Frontiers in Education. vol. 8, p. 2023.

[15] Chakraborty S, Gonzalez-Triana Y, Mendoza J, Galatro D. “Insights on mapping Industry 4.0 and Education 4.0.,” Frontiers in Education. vol. 8, p. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1150190.

[16] Azizah NN, Maryanti R, Nandiyanto AB. How to search and manage references with a specific referencing style using google scholar: from step-by-step processing for users to the practical examples in the referencing education. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. 2021;1(2):267–94.

[17] Al Husaeni DF, Nandiyanto AB. Bibliometric using Vosviewer with Publish or Perish (using google scholar data): from step-by-step processing for users to the practical examples in the analysis of digital learning articles in pre and post Covid-19 pandemic. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering. 2022;2(1):19–46.

[18] Harahap F, Nasution NE, Manurung B. The Effect of Blended Learning on Student’s Learning Achievement and Science Process Skills in Plant Tissue Culture Course. Int J Instr. 2019;12(1):521–38.

[19] N. Af’idayani, I. Setiadi, and F. Fahmi, “The effect of inquiry model on science process skills and learning outcomes.,” European Journal of Education Studies. p. 2018.

[20] Darmaji D, Kurniawan DA, Irdianti I. Physics Education Students’ Science Process Skills. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education. 2019;8(2):293– 8.

[21] Elfeky AI, Masadeh TS, Elbyaly MY. Advance organizers in flipped classroom via e-learning management system and the promotion of integrated science process skills. Think Skills Creativity. 2020;35:100622.

[22] J.D. Hilarius and S. Herawati, “Enhancing different ethnicity science process skills: Problem-based learning through practicum and authentic assessment.,” International Journal of Instruction. p. 2019.

[23] Winarti A, Yuanita L, Nur M. The Effectiveness of Multiple Intelligences Based Teaching Strategy in Enhancing the Multiple Intelligences and Science Process Skills of Junior High School Students. Journal of Technology and Science Education. 2019;9(2):122–35.

[24] Haryadi R, Pujiastuti H. “PhET simulation software-based learning to improve science process skills.,” In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. pp. 22017. IOP Publishing (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/2/022017.

[25] Kurniawan W, Darmaji D, Astalini A, Kurniawan DA, Hidayat M, Kurniawan N, et al. Multimedia Physics Practicum Reflective Material Based on Problem Solving for Science Process Skills. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education. 2019;8(4):590–5.

[26] Wiwin E, Kustijono R. “The use of physics practicum to train science process skills and its effect on the scientific attitude of vocational high school students.” In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. pp. 12040. IOP Publishing (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/997/1/012040.

[27] Mulyeni T, Jamaris M, Supriyati Y. Improving basic science process skills through inquiry-based approach in learning science for early elementary students. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 2019;16(2):187–201.

[28] Ekici M, Erdem M. Developing science process skills through mobile scientific inquiry. Think Skills Creativity. 2020;36:100658.

[29] Solé-Llussà A, Aguilar D, Ibá nez M. Video worked examples to promote elementary students’ science process skills: a fruit decomposition inquiry activity. J Biol Educ. 2021;55(4):368–79.

[30] Ping IL, Halim L, Osman K. Explicit Teaching of Scientific Argumentation as an Approach in Developing Argumentation Skills, Science Process Skills and Biology Understanding. J Balt Sci Educ. 2020;19(2):276–88.

[31] Arantika J, Saputro S, Mulyani S. Effectiveness of guided inquiry-based module to improve science process skills. Journal of physics: conference series. IOP Publishing; 2019. p. 42019.

[32] Bhakti YB, Astuti IA, Okyranida IY, et al. “Integrated STEM project-based learning implementation to improve student science process skills.” In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. pp. 12016. IOP Publishing (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1464/1/012016.

[33] Haryadi R, Vita M, Utami IS, Ihsanudin I, Setiani Y, Sherman A. “Briquettes production as teaching aids physics for improving science process skills.,” In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. pp. 32006. IOP Publishing (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1157/3/032006.

[34] Solé-Llussà A, Aguilar D, Ibá nez M. Video-worked examples to support the development of elementary students’ science process skills: a case study in an inquiry activity on electrical circuits. Res Sci Technol Educ. 2022;40(2):251–71.

[35] Dewantara D, Mahtari S, Nur M, Yuanita L, Sunarti T. The Correlation of Scientific Knowledge-Science Process Skills and Scientific Creativity in Creative Responsibility Based Learning. Int J Instr. 2020;13(3):307–16.

[36] Artun H, Durukan A, Temur A. Effects of virtual reality enriched science laboratory activities on pre-service science teachers’ science process skills. Educ Inf Technol. 2020;25(6):5477–98.

[37] Tan RM, Yangco RT, Que EN. Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Science Process Skills in an Inquiry-Based Flipped Classroom Environment. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction. 2020;17(1):159–84.

[38] A.B.D. Nandiyanto and D.F. Al Husaeni, “A bibliometric analysis of materials research in Indonesian journal using VOSviewer.,” Journal of Engineering Research. p. 2021. https://doi.org/10.36909/jer.ASSEEE.16037.

[39] I. Hamidah, S. Sriyono, and M.N. Hudha, “A Bibliometric Analysis of Covid-19 research using VOSviewer.,” Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology. pp. 34–41, 2020. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v5i2.24522.