Mapping of Various Quality Management System Model to ISO 9001:2015

Abstract

Measurement of Quality Management Systems (QMS) in construction projects is very important to assess the fulfillment of quality standards. A comprehensive and up-to-date standard setting is paramount. Much research has been done to develop a Quality Management System (QMS), but only focused on the quality management system in general by means of interviews and statistics. There are still only a few studies that focus on determining quality variables based on ISO 9001:2015, but they do not consider other Quality Management Systems (QMS) to obtain variables that are not in ISO 9001 2015. This research aimed to map out ISO 9001:2015 to find additional variables that are not present inside it. Six Sigma, Deming, Total Quality Management (TQM), Quality Management System (QMS), Baldrige Performance Excellence Framework, and LEAN Manufacturing are models for developing Quality Management Systems (QMS) that are widely applied in the construction industry today. This research produced eight additional variables as audit materials, which were expected to make ISO 9001:2015 better in its application and development in construction services. The eight variables were breaking down barriers between departments, eliminating pressure, eliminating arbitrary numerical targets, respecting people, contributing to society, reducing cycle time, increasing process transparency, and focusing on global process control. This research provides factors from a more varied and up-to-date quality management system that complements ISO 9001:2015


Keywords: mapping, Measurement of Quality Management System (QMS)

References
[1] Abdullah MN, Asmoni M, Mohammed AH, et al. Critical success factors of project quality management system for Malaysian construction industry. Jurnal Teknologi 2015:74(2):123-131.

[2] Al-Sabek F. Critical factors affecting the implementation of total quality management in the construction industry in UAE. Int J Civ Environ Eng. 2018;9:1509–13.

[3] Neyestani B. Effectiveness of quality management system (QMS) on construction projects. http.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.290272. 2016.

[4] Aburas M, Lee A. A literature review exploring the critical success factors for the effective implementation of the ISO 9001 quality management system in construction projects. In: 14th INTERNATIONAL POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH CONFERENCE 2019. Contemporary and Future Directions in the Built Environment; 2019. p. 61.

[5] Aburas M. Critical success factors for implementing ISO 9001 in UK construction projects. University of Salford (United Kingdom). 2020.

[6] Konsultan IS. Perbandingan Jumlah Sertifikasi ISO Negara ASEAN. Multiple Training & Consulting; 2015. p. 1.

[7] Asa MF, Abidin IS, Latief Y. Faktor-faktor kritis dalam sistem manajemen mutu (SMM) untuk optimasi profitabilitas dan daya saing perusahaan jasa konstruksi di Indonesia. J Tek Sipil ITB. 2008;15(3):99–106.

[8] Hammer M, Goding J. Putting six sigma in perspective. Quality. 2001;40:58.

[9] Klefsjo B, Bergquist B, Edgeman RL. Six Sigma and Total Quality Management: different day, same soup? Int J Six Sigma Compet Advant. 2006;2(2):162–78.

[10] Keller P. Six Sigma Demystified. McGraw-Hill Education; 2011.

[11] Thamrin DAF. Six Sigma Implementation and Integra-tion within Project Management Frame-work in Engineering, Procurement, and Construction Projects. Chalmers University Of Technology. Thesis, 2017.

[12] Deming DW. Leadership Institute Inc. Leadersh Inst Inc; 2005. pp. 8–9.

[13] Neyestani B, Juanzon JBP. Identification of A Set of Appropriate Critical Success Factors for Successful TQM Implementation in Construction, and Other Industries. Munich Pers RePEc Arch.

[14] Aureliano F, Costa A, Júnior I, et al. Aplicación de la producción ajustada en la gestión de la construcción. Procedia Manufacturing ;38:244–6.