Download fulltext HTML
., S., Aminudin, A., Yogopriyatno, J., ., S., & ., N. (2024). Human Rights-based Public Service in the Class IIA Correctional Facility of Bengkulu. KnE Social Sciences, 9(7), 674–691. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i7.15539

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i7.15539

statistics

  • 207 Abstract Views
  • 30 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • Sartika .

    Sartika .

    Public Administration Department, University of Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Achmad Aminudin

    Achmad Aminudin

    Public Administration Department, University of Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Jatmiko Yogopriyatno

    Jatmiko Yogopriyatno

    Public Administration Department, University of Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Suratman .

    Suratman .

    Public Administration Department, University of Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Nursanty .

    Nursanty .

    Public Administration Department, University of Bengkulu, Indonesia

Published Date

  • Mar 19, 2024

Human Rights-based Public Service in the Class IIA Correctional Facility of Bengkulu

KnE Social Sciences / IAPA 2023 Annual International Conference / Pages 674–691

Abstract

This study is designed to describe problems related to human rights-based public services in the Class IIA Correctional Facility of Bengkulu from the perspective of implementing human rights-based public service policies consisting of accessibility and availability of facilities, human resources availability, officer compliance, public service innovation, and integrity. This type of research uses a qualitative descriptive methodology with data collection techniques that include observation, interviews, and documentation. Data analysis stages involve data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. The research findings indicate that the implementation of public service at Class IIA Correctional Facility is not yet optimal, as several issues related to the five research aspects are identified, including the inadequacy of facilities and infrastructure for vulnerable groups, overcrowding in the correctional facility housing blocks, limited quality of prison staff, a lack of innovative service provision, and the presence of alleged irregular practices within the correctional facility. Recommendations for improving future service implementation by the jail include providing adequate facilities and infrastructure, enhancing human resources through education and training, facilitating innovations in public service, and establishing effective monitoring and complaint mechanisms.


Keywords: correctional facility, human rights, public service

References
[1] Setiadi W. “Korupsi di Indonesia (Penyebab, Bahaya, Hambatanm, dan Upaya Pemberantasan, serta Regulasi),” no. 1, pp. 249–262, 2018.

[2] Bayu D. “ICW: Penindakan Kasus Korupsi Meningkat pada 2022,” 2023. https://dataindonesia.id/varia/detail/icw-penindakan-kasus-korupsi-meningkat-pada- 2022 (accessed Sep. 20, 2023).

[3] Sukiyat H. Teori dan Praktik Pendidikan Anti Korupsi. Jakad Media Publishing; 2020.

[4] https://kpk.go.id, “Fungsi dan Tugas KPK,” 2017. http://www.kpk.go.id/id/tentangkpk/ struktur-organisasi/93-tentang-kpk/fungsi-dan-tugas (accessed Sep. 15, 2023).

[5] https://ti.or.id, “INDEKS PERSEPSI KORUPSI INDONESIA 2022,” 2023. https://ti.or.id/indeks-persepsi-korupsi-indonesia-2022-mengalami-penurunanterburuk- sepanjang-sejarah-reformasi/ (accessed Sep. 15, 2023).

[6] Yustia DA, Arifin F. Bureaucratic reform as an effort to prevent corruption in Indonesia. Cogent Soc Sci. 2023;9(1):2166196.

[7] Creswell JW. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method Aproaches. SAGE Publ.; 2007. pp. 203–23.

[8] Yin RK. “The abridged version of case study research,” Handb. Appl. Soc. Res. methods, vol. 2, pp. 229–259, 1998.

[9] Mahadi M. BAHASA HUKUM ADAT DALAM PETA BUMI BAHASA-HUKUM NASIONAL. J. Huk. Pembang. 1983;13(3):214–22.

[10] https://ombudsman.go.id, “Mengenal Maladministrasi,” 2021. https://ombudsman.go.id/artikel/r/artikel–mengenal-maladministrasi (accessed Sep. 15, 2023).

[11] H. Nurtjahjo, “Perbedaan Teoritis Antara Lembaga Penyelesaian Kasus Maladministrasi (Ombudsman) Dengan Lembaga Peradilan Administrasi (PTUN),” J. Huk. dan Bisnis, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 32–51, 2016.

[12] Ombudsman, Laporan Maladministrasi Tahun 2022. Jakarta: Ombudsman RI; 2023.

[13] Sampara S. Maladministration in the context of the public service. J. Humanit. 2014;02(01):122–35.

[14] Palifka BJ, Rose-Ackerman S, editors. “Bureaucratic Corruption,” in Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2016. pp. 51–92.

[15] https://kpk.go.id, “Statistik TPK Berdasarkan Instansi,” 2023. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/statistik/penindakan/tpk-berdasarkan-instansi (accessed Oct. 10, 2023).

[16] Suhendi S. Hendi; Ang, Perilaku Organisasi. Bandung: Pustaka Setia; 2010.

[17] Dwiyanto A. Reformasi birokrasi kontekstual. Gadjah Mada University Press; 2015.

[18] https://antikorupsi.org, “Tren Penindakan Kasus Korupsi Tahun 2022,” 2023. https://antikorupsi.org/id/tren-penindakan-kasus-korupsi-tahun-2022 (accessed Sep. 15, 2023).

[19] Graycar A, Jancsics D. Gift Giving and Corruption. Int J Public Adm. 2017 Oct;40(12):1013–23.