Maladministration and Corrupt Behavior: Indonesia's Bureaucracy Reforms Perspective
Abstract
Maladministration is a form of bad governance that can lead to corruption, however, there are exceptions to this. Although the grand design of reform has been underway for more than 10 years, anti-corruption behavior in the bureaucracy has remained the same, even made worse by looking at the maladministration perception index. This article presents a qualitative descriptive method to understand the relationship between maladministration and corrupt behavior using corruption case study, articles, and reports on implementing bureaucratic reform and other relevant reports. Much literature states that corrupt behavior is closely related to authority and incompetence. It is included in the public sector, which the government must do. The need for strategies to increase transparency and accountability in the bureaucracy is an ongoing challenge in realizing a clean and anti-corruption bureaucracy.
Keywords: maladministration, corruption, bureaucratic reform, public sector
References
[1] Setiadi W. “Korupsi di Indonesia (Penyebab, Bahaya, Hambatanm, dan Upaya Pemberantasan, serta Regulasi),” no. 1, pp. 249–262, 2018.
[2] Bayu D. “ICW: Penindakan Kasus Korupsi Meningkat pada 2022,” 2023. https://dataindonesia.id/varia/detail/icw-penindakan-kasus-korupsi-meningkat-pada- 2022 (accessed Sep. 20, 2023).
[3] Sukiyat H. Teori dan Praktik Pendidikan Anti Korupsi. Jakad Media Publishing; 2020.
[4] https://kpk.go.id, “Fungsi dan Tugas KPK,” 2017. http://www.kpk.go.id/id/tentangkpk/ struktur-organisasi/93-tentang-kpk/fungsi-dan-tugas (accessed Sep. 15, 2023).
[5] https://ti.or.id, “INDEKS PERSEPSI KORUPSI INDONESIA 2022,” 2023. https://ti.or.id/indeks-persepsi-korupsi-indonesia-2022-mengalami-penurunanterburuk- sepanjang-sejarah-reformasi/ (accessed Sep. 15, 2023).
[6] Yustia DA, Arifin F. Bureaucratic reform as an effort to prevent corruption in Indonesia. Cogent Soc Sci. 2023;9(1):2166196.
[7] Creswell JW. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method Aproaches. SAGE Publ.; 2007. pp. 203–23.
[8] Yin RK. “The abridged version of case study research,” Handb. Appl. Soc. Res. methods, vol. 2, pp. 229–259, 1998.
[9] Mahadi M. BAHASA HUKUM ADAT DALAM PETA BUMI BAHASA-HUKUM NASIONAL. J. Huk. Pembang. 1983;13(3):214–22.
[10] https://ombudsman.go.id, “Mengenal Maladministrasi,” 2021. https://ombudsman.go.id/artikel/r/artikel–mengenal-maladministrasi (accessed Sep. 15, 2023).
[11] H. Nurtjahjo, “Perbedaan Teoritis Antara Lembaga Penyelesaian Kasus Maladministrasi (Ombudsman) Dengan Lembaga Peradilan Administrasi (PTUN),” J. Huk. dan Bisnis, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 32–51, 2016.
[12] Ombudsman, Laporan Maladministrasi Tahun 2022. Jakarta: Ombudsman RI; 2023.
[13] Sampara S. Maladministration in the context of the public service. J. Humanit. 2014;02(01):122–35.
[14] Palifka BJ, Rose-Ackerman S, editors. “Bureaucratic Corruption,” in Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2016. pp. 51–92.
[15] https://kpk.go.id, “Statistik TPK Berdasarkan Instansi,” 2023. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/statistik/penindakan/tpk-berdasarkan-instansi (accessed Oct. 10, 2023).
[16] Suhendi S. Hendi; Ang, Perilaku Organisasi. Bandung: Pustaka Setia; 2010.
[17] Dwiyanto A. Reformasi birokrasi kontekstual. Gadjah Mada University Press; 2015.
[18] https://antikorupsi.org, “Tren Penindakan Kasus Korupsi Tahun 2022,” 2023. https://antikorupsi.org/id/tren-penindakan-kasus-korupsi-tahun-2022 (accessed Sep. 15, 2023).
[19] Graycar A, Jancsics D. Gift Giving and Corruption. Int J Public Adm. 2017 Oct;40(12):1013–23.