Ganjar Pranowo's Political Communication on Twitter; 2024 Presidential Victory Strategy
Abstract
This research analyzes Ganjar Pranowo’s strategic focus in the 2024 Presidential election on three sub-themes of the Human Development Index, namely Health, Education, and Economy via Twitter. This research aims to understand how Ganjar Pranowo uses the Twitter platform to highlight Health, Education, and Economic issues in the context of the 2024 Presidential election. The study has academic relevance because it provides insight into how a political candidate uses social media to convey political message. Meanwhile, this research can practically offer political candidates’ and campaign teams’ preferences in designing communication strategies via social media. The methodology used in this research is qualitative with the Qualitative Data Analysis (QDA) Miner approach. Content, network, and cloud analysis was performed using the Nvivo 12 Plus software. The findings were that Health was the main topic, with a discussion percentage of 47.11%, followed by Education with 34.71%, and Economics with 18.18%. This reflects Ganjar Pranowo’s emphasis on access to quality health services and commitment to education issues. This finding means that it provides insight into the focus of his political strategy. The research concludes that Ganjar Pranowo’s strategy in using Twitter in the context of the 2024 presidential election focuses on Health and Education issues as an attraction for voters. However, economic discussions and articulation of economic policies must be improved to ensure voters understand Ganjar’s plans for facing future economic challenges. The practical implication of this research is that political candidates can consider the importance of emphasizing Health and Education issues in their communication strategies via social media. In addition, this research also underscores the need for improvements in economic policy communication to increase voters’ understanding of candidates’ financial plans.
Keywords: campaign, digital politics, general elections
References
[1] Putri NB, Romli NA. ANALISIS DAMPAK ADIKSI INTERNET PADA MEDIA SOSIAL TWITTER DI INDONESIA DENGAN PENDEKATAN TEORI KOMUNIKASI. J Komun Univ Garut Has Pemikir dan Penelit. 2021;7(1).
[2] Alayya J. Strategi Populisme “Wong Cilik” Ganjar Pranowo Dalam Twitter Untuk Mengelola Citra Positif. J Komun Prof. 2023;7(3).
[3] Elianda Y, Iqbal M, Akbar A. Big data analysis: Ganjar Pranowo’s political communication through social media Twitter. Smart Cities Reg Dev J.; 2021.
[4] Atmojo ME, Pratiwi VP, Fridayani HD. SOCIAL MEDIA AS A POLITICAL COMMUNICATION PLATFORM (A CASE STUDY OF TWITTER ACCOUNT@ GANJARPRANOWO). Commun Today. 2022;
[5] Pal J, Gonawela A. Studying political communication on Twitter: the case for small data. Vol. 18. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2017;18:97–102.
[6] Kurniawan C, Nurmandi A, Muallidin I. Economic Recovery for Tourism Sector Based on Social Media Data Mining. Vol. 1. Springer International Publishing; 2021. 174–180 p.
[7] Pratama IN, Ibrahim AH, Akbar P. Pentahelix Collaboration Concept as an Effort to Accelerate Poverty Reduction in the Covid-19 Situation in the City of Mataram. J Public Policy. 2023;9(1).
[8] Ojala M, Pantti M, Laaksonen SM. Networked publics as agents of accountability: online interactions between citizens, the media and immigration officials during the European refugee crisis. New Media Soc. 2019;21(2):279–97.
[9] Brekke JP, Thorbjørnsrud K. Communicating borders-Governments deterring asylum seekers through social media campaigns. Migr Stud. 2018;8(1):43–65.
[10] Tofighi B, Aphinyanaphongs Y, Marini C, Ghassemlou S, Nayebvali P, Metzger I, et al. Detecting illicit opioid content on Twitter. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2020 Mar;39(3):205–8.
[11] Alfatease A, Alqahtani AM, Orayj K, Alshahrani SM. The impact of social media on the acceptance of the covid-19 vaccine: A cross-sectional study from saudi arabia. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Nov;15:2673–81.
[12] Edhlund B. NVivo 12 Essentials. Lulu.com; 2019. 402 p.
[13] Hai-Jew S. NVivo 12 Plus’s New Qualitative Cross-Tab Analysis Function. Vol. 1, C2C Digital Magazine. Kansas State University; 2019. p. 15.
[14] Salahudin S, Nurmandi A, Loilatu MJ. How to Design Qualitative Research with NVivo 12 Plus for Local Government Corruption Issues in Indonesia? J Stud Pemerintah. 2020;11(3). https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.113124.
[15] Alam S. Penggunaan Media Sosial Sebagai Alat Komunikasi Politik. Avant Garde. 2021;9(1). https://doi.org/10.36080/ag.v9i1.1257.
[16] Saud M, Ida R, Abbas A, Ashfaq A, Ahmad AR. Media Sosial dan Digitalisasi Partisipasi Politik Pada Generasi Muda: perspektif Indonesia. Society. 2020;8(1).
[17] Lundgren-Henriksson EL, Sorsa V. Open strategizing on social media: A process model of emotional mechanisms and outcomes from un-orchestrated participation. Long Range Plann. 2023;56(3):102320.
[18] Simonofski A, Fink J, Burnay C. Supporting policy-making with social media and e-participation platforms data: A policy analytics framework. Gov Inf Q. 2021;38(3):101590.
[19] Büttner CM, Lalot F, Rudert SC. Showing with whom I belong: the desire to belong publicly on social media. Comput Human Behav. 2023;139:139.