Download fulltext HTML
Dhiny Dewantara, N. (2024). Job Satisfaction and Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB): The Moderating Role of Social Identity. KnE Social Sciences, 9(5), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i5.15178

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i5.15178

statistics

  • 271 Abstract Views
  • 100 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • Nur Dhiny Dewantara

    Nur Dhiny Dewantara

    University of Muhammadiyah, Malang, Indonesia

Published Date

  • Feb 7, 2024

Job Satisfaction and Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB): The Moderating Role of Social Identity

KnE Social Sciences / International Conference of Applied Psychology (ICAP-H) / Pages 249–262

Abstract

Organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) is a contribution from individuals who go beyond the role in the workplace from what is assigned and rewarded. Employees who are satisfied with their jobs may be more able to bring out OCB behavior. The relationship can be strengthened by each individual’s social identity. The purpose of this study was to determine the moderating role of social identity on the relationship between job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior. The subjects of this study were 75 employees who worked at the Aster Cosmetic company in Malang. The total sampling method was used, wherein the entire population served as the subject. A quantitative research design was used. Data were analyzed using the Hayes PROCESS. The results show that job satisfaction significantly affects OCB behavior. It can be explained that the higher a person’s job satisfaction, the more able the employee will be to show OCB behavior. Meanwhile, social identity is not able to moderate the relationship between job satisfaction and OCB.


Keywords: job satisfaction, OCB, social identity

References
[1] De Geus Cj, Ingrams A, Tummers L, Pandey Sk. Organizational Citizenship behavior in the public sector: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Wiley. 2020.

[2] Ribeiro , Duarte P, Filipe R, David R. Does authentic leadership stimulate organizational citizenship behaviors? The importance of affective commitment as a mediator. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. 2022;13(2):320–340.

[3] Nguyen. The effect of other in-group members’ organizational citizenship behavior on employees’ organizational deviance: A moral licensing perspective. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies. 2021;28(3):177–190.

[4] Casu G, Mariani MG, Chiesa R, Guglielmi D, Gregmigni P. The role of organizational citizenship behavior and gender between job satisfaction and task performance. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(18):9499.

[5] Thevanes N, Harikaran S. Work life balance and organizational performance the mediating role of organizational citizenship behavior. Asian Journal of Social Sciences. 2020;7(4):280–287.

[6] Hendrawan A, Sucahyawati H, Indriyani I. Organizational Citizenship Behavior (Ocb) Pada Karyawan Akademi Maritim Nusantara. Unimus; 2017.

[7] Lestari ER, Ghaby NKF. Pengaruh Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) terhadap kepuasan kerja dan kinerja karyawan. Industria. 2018;7.

[8] Yaakobi E, Weisberg J. Organizational citizenship behavior predicts quality, creativity, and efficiency performance: The roles of occupational and collective efficacies. Organizational Psychology. 2020;11.

[9] Becton J, Carr J, Mossholder K. Differential effects of task performance organizational citizenship behavior, and job complexity on voluntary turn over. Business and Psychology. 2017;32:495–508.

[10] Astuti P, Sari YD, Widiana H. Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) pada paramedic. Jurnal Psikologi Integratif. 2019; 7.

[11] Ramdhani B. Pengaruh reward, kepuasan kerja dan komitmen organisasi terhadap Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) pada karyawan titik terang konveksi. Jurnal Ilmiah Edunomika. 2021.

[12] Ocvi N, Palupiningdyah. Factors affecting organizational citizenship behavior. Manajemen Analysis Jurnal. 2022.

[13] Alviano I, Saloom G. Validasi pengukuran identitas sosial versi Indonesia dengan analisis faktor konfirmatori (CFA). Psikoborneo. 2022;10:761–769.

[14] Sugiyono. Metodelogi Penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. 2019.

[15] Masturoh, Anggita N. Metodologi penelitian kesehatan Jakarta: Pusat pendidikan sumber daya manusia kesehatan. 2018.

[16] Grasiaswaty N, Juwita FR, Setyasih N. Adaptasi alat ukur Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) dengan peer review di Indonesia. Psychology & Humanity. 2016.

[17] Winarsunu T. Statistik dalam penelitian psikologi dan pendidikan. Malang: UMM Press; 2015.

[18] Fitrio T, Apriansyah R, Utami S, Yaspita H. The effect of job satisfaction to Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) mediated by organizational commitment. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM). 2019;7.

[19] Alkhadher O, Beehr T, Li M. Individualism-collectivism and nation as moderators of the job satisfaction-organizational citizenship behavior relationship in the U.S., China, and Kuwait. Asian Journal of Social Psychology. 2020;23:469–482.

[20] Ng Lp, Choong Yo, Kuar Ls, Tan Ce, Teoh Sy. Job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviour amongst health professionals: The mediating role of work engagement. International Journal of Healthcare Management. 2021;14(3):797–804.

[21] Yaakobi E, Weisberg J. Organizational citizenship behavior predicts quality, creativity, and efficiency performance: The roles of occupational and collective efficacies. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020.