Cost Analysis the Implementation of New Material: The Case Study of Cement Product
Abstract
This study will perform a cost analysis of using synthetic and natural gypsum by using the traditional costing method and to determine the investment analysis of the initiative strategy of gypsum synthetic. The research purpose is to compare the impact of gypsum synthetic implementation cost and gypsum natural consumption cost, and to find out whether the savings cost from gypsum synthetic consumption can cover the investment costs of implementing strategy. The existing calculation cost of material consumption products uses traditional costing methods, so this research is using this method that will compare the consumption costs between both Gypsum. Net present value and interest rate return methods are to determine the levels of investments needed to overcome problems in the consumption of synthetic gypsum. According to this research, the result of the net present value methods was IDR 1,543,004,654 and the interest rate return reaches 17.09%, for the planned case of 10 years, which means that this initiative is accepted and feasible to apply, it means that to produce cement, for the application of gypsum synthetic consumption as initiative strategy and application of 3 alternative strategies for these investment will result in positive impact for long-term decision.
Keywords: cement industry, gypsum synthetic, production, cost analysis, traditional costing, net present value, internal rate return
References
[1] Barros. Economic feasibility study of photovoltaic panels installation by PVsyst 6.73 Simulator. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science (IJAERS). 2018;5(9). Brasil.
[2] Bloucer, Stout and Cookins. Cost Management: A strategic emphasis. 5th ed. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.; 2005.
[3] Vincenzo C, Francesco G, Eugenio DB, Annapaola S, Maria RV, Sannino S, et al. Return on investment (ROI) and development of a workplace disability management program in a Hospital—A pilot evaluation study. Italy Int J Environ Res Public Health.2020;17:8084.
[4] Candra KP. Ekonomi Teknik Kuliah ke-9 NET PRESENT VALUE (NPV) dan Kriteria Konsep Dasar dan Kompetensi, 2011.
[5] Deng dan Parajuli. Return on investment and profitability analysis of bio fuels production using a modeling approach. Journal Information Processing in Agriculture. 2018;3:92–98.
[6] Hansen DR, Maryanne MM. Managerial accounting. 6th ed. Mason (Ohio): South- Western Publishing, Co; 2009.
[7] Hansen G, Mowen MM. Cost management: Accounting & control. 6th ed. Mason (Ohio): South-Western Publishing, Co; 2005.
[8] Heinzer J, Render B. Manajemen Operasi: Manajemen Keberlangsungan dan Rantai Pasokan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat; 2015.
[9] Leon M, Silva J, Carrasco S, Barrientos N. Design, cost estimation and sensitivity analysis for a production process of activated carbon from waste nutshells by physical activation. Brasil: Journal MDPI; 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8080945.
[10] Mariana M, Abdul Khalil HPS, Mistar EM, Yahya Esam. Recent advances in activated carbon modification techniques for enhanced heavy metal adsorption. Journal Water Process Engineer. 2021;43.
[11] Subagyo M. Bastian. Akuntansi Manajemen Berbasis Desain. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press; 2018.
[12] Tebabal CG. Effect of gypsum amount in cement on fresh and hardened properties of self-compacting concrete. Global Science Journal. 2020;8(5).
[13] Zaini, et al. Costing structure improvement using activity based costing in palm oil plantation of Malaysia. Journal of Modern System Manufacturing and Technology. 2020;4(1):95-109. https://doi.org/10.15282/jmmst.v4i1.3838