Systematic Literature Review: The Methodology Applied for Social Media Marketing Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i4.15076Abstract
The development and requirements that take place within and around marketing drive changes. With the existence of social media, the marketing function in the growth of the company has undergone a significant transformation. The use of social media in marketing today is increasingly widespread. Online platforms that are used to share and become an important part of their daily activities make social media increasingly important for business people to be able to interact with consumers or potential consumers. The purpose of this article is to review all the literature that brings social media marketing as their main topic in Web of Science Journal and synthesizes the methodologies that researchers use in the topic. The result shows that most of the studies used quantitative methods with 85% digital-based study set. The most preferred digital platforms are Facebook and Twitter, which are used globally by the people.
Keywords: social media marketing, systematic literature review, Facebook, Twitter, marketing
References
Ahuja RD, Anne Michels T, Mazzei Walker M, Weissbuch M. Teen perceptions of disclosure in buzz marketing. J Consum Mark. 2007;24(3):151–159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760710746157
Briner RB, Denyer D, Rousseau DM. Evidence-based management: Concept cleanup time? Acad Manage Perspect. 2009;23(4):19–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2009.45590138
Chadegani AA, Salehi H, Yunus MM, Farhadi H, Fooladi M, Farhadi M, et al. A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases. Asian Soc Sci. 2013;9(5). https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n5p18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n5p18
Debra Williamson. Worldwide Social Network Ad Spending: ARising Tide. EMarketer. 2011.
Kotler P. Marketing management. Pearson Prentice Hall; 2009.
Saravanakumar M, Sugantha Lakshmi T. Social media marketing. Life Sci J. 2012;9(4).
Mangold WG, Faulds DJ. Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Bus Horiz. 2009;52(4):357–365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.03.002
Mulrow CD. Rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ. 1994 Sep;309(6954):597–599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6954.597
Murdough C. Social media measurement. J Interact Advert. 2009;10(1):94–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2009.10722165
Putu Wuri Handayani. Systematic Review dengan PRISMA (preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis). 2017. https://dosen.perbanas.id/wpcontent/ uploads/2017/08/Sesi2-SYSTEMATIC-REVIEW-DENGAN-PRISMA.pdf
Retnawati H, Apino E, Djidu H, Kartianom K, Anazifa R. Pengantar Analisis Meta. 2018.
Rousseau DM, Manning J, Denyer D. Evidence in management and organizational science: Assembling the field’s full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses. 2008. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1309606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1309606
Van Belleghem S, Eenhuizen M, Veris E. SocialMedia around the world 2011. InSites Consulting; 2011.
Zhao Y, Pinto Llorente AM, Sánchez Gómez MC. Digital competence in higher education research: A systematic literature review. Comput Educ. 2021 Jul;168:104212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212
