Published date: Jan 05 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 4th International Conference on Law Reform (4th INCLAR)

Pages: 323– 334

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v8i21.14737

Siti Nurahmi NasutionUniversitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

Sutiarnoto .Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

Jelly LevizaUniversitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

Adwani .Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia

Free trade extends to services as well as to goods. In this situation, removing trade restrictions on services is necessary to increase market accessibility. While this is going on, the application of national treatment, technical regulations, standards, and conformity assessment might be a barrier to the free trade of services. This research intends to examine the “mutual recognition arrangement’s” (MRA) free trade principles for the services sector. This research is normative legal research. MRA is one of ASEAN’s policies in facilitating free trade including trade in services. Under AFAS (“ASEAN Framework Agreement on Services”), which intends to mobilize trade in the service sector, particularly about standardization and conformity assessment, MRA on free trade in the service sector is developed. The principle of non-discrimination, which consists of “most favored nations” (MFN), national treatment, and transparency, supports free trade in the service industry. Free trade in the service sector through the MRA has the principle of mutual recognition through testing of qualification requirements and technical standards that have been approved by member states without discrimination such as giving special treatment. Every producer gets equal treatment both at home and abroad, and all provisions and policies must be published so that each member of the state may be aware of them.

Keywords: principles of MRA, free trade in services sector, MRA

[1] Nopirin. “Journal of Indonesian Economy And Business,” 1997. [Online]. Available: https://journal.ugm.ac.id/jieb/article/view/39991. [Accessed 2 Maret 2023].

[2] DJBC. “Sekilas FTA,” Direktorat Kerja Sama Internasional Kepabeanan dan Cukai, DJBC, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://fta.beacukai.go.id/sekilas-fta/. [Accessed 2 Maret 2023].

[3] Center F. “Sekilas Tentang FTA,” FTA Center Kementerian Perdagangan, 9 Maret 2023. [Online]. Available: https://ftacenter.kemendag.go.id/sekilas-tentang-fta. [Accessed 15 Maret 2023].

[4] Panji Nurindra IP. Pentingnya Jasa Dalam Perdagangan Indonesia. TPSA Canada - Indonesia Trade and Private Sector Assistance Project; 2016.

[5] Rizqi SA. Penyebab Lambatnya Penetapan Mutual Recognition Arrangement Jasa ASEAN. Depok: Universitas Indonesia; 2010.

[6] The ASEAN Secretariat is based in Jakarta, Indonesia, Guidelines for the Development of Mutual Recognition Arrangements. Jakarta: Public Outreach and Civil Society; 2014.

[7] Muhaimin, Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram: Mataram University Press; 2020.

[8] Kesuma T. Mutual Recognition Arrangements (MRAs) Dalam Rangka Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN (ASEAN Economic Community) Dalam Perspektif Hukum Internasional dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Hukum Nasional Indonesia. Medan: Universitas Sumatera Utara; 2017.

[9] Directorate General of Higher Education Ministry of Education and Culture Republic of Indonesia. “ASEAN Mutual Recognition Arrangement,” 2012. [Online]. Available: http://kkni.ristekdikti.go.id/asset/pdf/ 00_preface_of_asean_mutual_recognition_arrangement.pdf. [Accessed 6 April 2023].

[10] Klabbers J. International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139022569.

[11] Keputusan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 82 Tahun 2002 tentang Pengesahan ASEAN Framework on Mutual Recognition Arrangements (Perjanjian Kerangka ASEAN tentang Pengaturan Saling Pengakuan), 2002.

[12] Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2014, 2014.

[13] Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomo 38 Tahun 2014, 2014.

[14] Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2017, 2017.

[15] Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 14/M-DAG/PER/3/2006, 2006.

[16] Anggraeny I, Ayu IK. The Implementation of Honesty Principles in Therapeutic Agreements based on the Health Law Perspective in Indonesia. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020 Oct;14(4):4249–53.

[17] Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 2011, 2011.

[18] Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 10 Tahun 2009, 2009.

[19] Badan Kebijakan Fiska Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. “Workshop Memahami Ketentuan-Ketentuan Perdagangan Internasional dalam Kerangka WTO dan FTA di Bidang Jasa Keuangan,” Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://fiskal.kemenkeu.go.id/baca/2014/05/05/172954994071990-workshopmemahami- ketentuan-ketentuan-perdagangan-internasional-dalam-kerangka-wtodan- fta-di-bidang-jasa-keuangan. [Accessed 27 April 2023].