Download fulltext HTML
Supriatna, R., Siska, F., & Dzulhijjah, L. (2023). Implementation of the Circumstantial Evidence in the Evidence Mechanism Process on Cartel Cases in Indonesia. KnE Social Sciences, 8(18), 1291–1304. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i18.14330

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i18.14330

statistics

  • 156 Abstract Views
  • 74 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • Rimba Supriatna

    Rimba Supriatna

    Bandung Islamic University
    https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2733-4620
  • Frency Siska

    Frency Siska

    Bandung Islamic University
  • Liza Dzulhijjah

    Liza Dzulhijjah

    Bandung Islamic University

Published Date

  • Oct 30, 2023

Implementation of the Circumstantial Evidence in the Evidence Mechanism Process on Cartel Cases in Indonesia

KnE Social Sciences / 5th Social and Humaniora Research Symposium (5th SoRes) / Pages 1291–1304

Abstract

Proving a cartel as one of the agreements prohibited in Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the prohibition of monopolistic practices and unfair business competition is not easy. Therefore, KPPU often uses indirect evidence as evidence in giving its decision, but this indirect evidence is not yet known in the legal system in Indonesia. This study aims to analyze the implementation of the use of indirect evidence in the process of proving cartel cases in Indonesia. The results of this study indicate that the implementation of the use of indirect evidence in the process of proving cartel cases in Indonesia has not been effective because it collides with the procedural law system in Indonesia, which has not accommodated indirect evidence so that many KPPU decisions have been cancelled both at the level of objection and cassation.


Keywords: evidence indirect evidence, business competition

References
[1] Antoni V. “The position of indirect evidence as verification tools in the cartel case.” Mimb Hukum-Fakultas Huk Univ Gadjah Mada. 2014;26(1):137–147.

[2] Putra IP, Wati NL, Sutama IN. Pengaruh Sistem Kartel terhadap Stabilitas Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia. J Prefer Huk. 2020;1(2):116–120.

[3] Rokan MK. Hukum Persaingan Usaha: Teori dan Praktiknya di Indonesia. Volume II. Jakarta: RajaGrapindo Persada; 2012.

[4] Candradevi NPIA, Mertha IK. “Penggunaan Alat Bukti Tidak Langsung Dalam Proses Pembuktian Dugaan Praktik Kartel Di Indonesia Oleh Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha.” Kertha Wicara. 2018;7(1).

[5] Yahya Harahap M. Hukum Acara Perdata: Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan. Sinar Graf; 2008.

[6] Lubis AF, et al. “Buku Teks Hukum Persaingan Usaha,” Jakarta. Accessed: Jun. 14, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.kppu.go.id/docs/buku/ FinalTextbookHukumPersainganUsahaKPPU2ndEd_Up20180104.pdf

[7] Anisah S. “Circumstantial Evidence dalam Kartel,” WEBINAR 20 TAHUN KPPU, Jul. 23, 2020.

[8] Winata N, Tan W. Penggunaan Bukti Tidak Langsung Dan Penerapan Leniency Program Di Kasus Kartel Indonesia. JUSTISI. 2022 Jan;8(1):30–39.

[9] Anggraini AM. PENGGUNAAN BUKTI EKONOMI DALAM KARTEL BERDASARKAN HUKUM PESAINGAN USAHA. J Huk PRIORIS. 2013;3(3).

[10] Kurniawan. “Bukti Tidak Langsung Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kartel.” Jatiswara. 2019 Nov;34(3).

[11] Erlangga WD, Arrisman. “Analisis Kekuatan Alat Bukti Tidak Langsung dalam Pembuktian Dugaan Praktik Kartel”. J Supremasi. 2021;(Aug):31–47.

[12] Soetarna H. Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Acara Pidana. Bandung; 2011.

[13] Fuady M. Teori Hukum Pembuktian Pidana dan Perdata. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti; 2020.