Obesity of Information Covid-19 Children Vaccine and Parents Digital Literacy Ability
Abstract
This study aims to obtain data related to the “tabbayun” attitude of parents in understanding digital literacy in accessing information through social media, especially information on Covid-19 vaccinations for children aged between 06 and 11 years. The purposeless information in our brains can make us lose focus and ultimately make us unable to believe anything. Therefore, it is important to know how tabbayun parents are able to access information, especially the Covid-19 vaccination. Reasoned action theory with quantitative research methods and descriptive approaches chosen for this research, with data collection techniques were carried out through questionnaires, interviews, and supported by documentation, observation, and surveys. This research is expected to be a reference for parents in understanding digital literacy so that they are not trapped in with loads of information, as well as policymakers in conducting socialization and information related to health in the community, especially related to children’s health. To gain an understanding of how parents filter the rapid flow of information so that they are not trapped by inaccurate or even misleading information regarding the Covid-19 vaccination. The results of this study indicate that parents already understand well and are able to filter the information they get. But often, others, including spouses have different understanding patterns, causing debate. And parents also convey vaccination information to children in a language that is easy for children to understand, especially regarding information on Covid-19 vaccination. Impractical information to this literacy ability will be effected to the children vaccination permission and causes parents misunderstanding about the information.
Keywords: digital literacy, obesity information, family communication, online media, Covid-19 vaccination
References
[1] U. Indonesia Ministry of Health (Depkes RI), WHO. “COVID-19 vaccine acceptance survey in Indonesia,” 2020.
[2] Edmunds A, Morris A. The problem of information overload in business organizations: A review of the literature. Int J Inf Manage. 2000;20(1):17–28.
[3] Neumann-Böhme S, Varghese NE, Sabat I, et al. Once we have it, will we use it? A European survey on willingness to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Sep;21(7):977–982.
[4] Mutia A. “Survei KPAI: 64% Anak Belum Divaksin Covid- 19, Sebagian Takut Efek Vaksin,” databoks.com, 2021. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2021/08/30/survei-kpai-64-anak-belumdivaksin- covid-19-sebagian-takut-efek-vaksin (accessed Nov. 19, 2021).
[5] Latkin CA, Dayton L, Yi G, Konstantopoulos A, et al. “Trust in a COVID-19 vaccine in the U.S.: A social-ecological perspective Carl,” no. January, 2020.
[6] Rahadi DR. “Perilaku Pengguna Dan Informasi Hoax Di Media Sosial,” J. Manaj. Dan Kewirausahaan. 2017;5(1):58–70.
[7] Syam NW. Psikologi sebagai akar ilmu komunikasi. Bandung: Simbiosa Rekatama Media; 2011.
[8] Wikamorys DA, Rochmach TN. “APLIKASI THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR DALAM MEMBANGKITKAN NIAT PASIEN UNTUK MELAKUKAN OPERASI KATARAK.” J Adm Kesehat Indones. 2017;5(1), pp. 33–40, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal. unair.ac.id/JAKI/article/view/7048 https://doi.org/10.20473/jaki.v5i1.2017.32- 40.
[9] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2013.
[10] McMillan J. Research in education : Evidence-based inquiry. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc; 2006.
[11] P. B. A., Keagamaan L. “Respon Umat Beragama atas Rencana Vaksinasi Covid-19 L a p o r a n R i s e t Survei ‘Pengetahuan, Sikap dan Tindakan Umat Beragama terkait Covid-19, Vaksin, dan Vaksinasi,”’ 2021.
[12] Leonita E, Jalinus N. “Peran Media Sosial Dalam Upaya Promosi Kesehatan: Tinjauan Literatur.” Invotek J Inov Vokasional dan Teknol. 2018;18(20:25–34. https://doi.org/10.24036/invotek.v18i2.261
[13] Motta M, Callaghan T, Sylvester S. Knowing less but presuming more: Dunning- Kruger effects and the endorsement of anti-vaccine policy attitudes. Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;211( June):274–281.
[14] Mavragani A, Ochoa G. The internet and the anti-vaccine movement: tracking the 2017 eu measles outbreak. Big Data Cogn. Comput. 2018;2(1):1–18.
[15] Widyaningrum N, Trisnantoro L, Kurniawan NI. “Variations and Arguments of Anti- Vaccine Movement Groups on Facebook,” KnE. Soc Sci. 2022;2022(1):398–416.
[16] Baysan C, Yavaş SP, Uğur Karabat M. Examination of parents refusing administration of childhood vaccinations: turkey example. Child’S Heal. 2021;16(3):218–24.
[17] Putera VS, Sirodj DAN, Permana RH. “Vaksinasi Covid-19 di Media Sosial Twitter; Tinjauan Content dan Social Network Analysis.” Komunikologi J Pengemb Ilmu Komun. dan Sos. 2021;5(2):109. https://doi.org/10.30829/komunikologi.v5i2.9771