Establishment of Democratic Regional Regulations in Bandung District
Abstract
This research was conducted in Bandung Regency. The formation of democratic regional regulations by the Bandung Regency government has not been implemented democratically because community participation, as a form of democracy in the process of forming regional regulations, is only ceremonial. As a result, the space for the community to participate in responding or directly criticizing a regional policy packaged in regional regulations cannot be fully utilized. Several factors influence the formation of regional regulations. One of the main factors is the legal structure, where the Regional Government and DPRD do not provide sufficient space for the community to express their aspirations. The time allocated for discussing the legal substance during the process is also very limited, which hinders the full application of democratic principles as outlined in the Act. The research utilized an empirical approach with direct research and was documented as it is. It was found that the formation of legislation in the region is still relatively limited because the publication of regional regulations to the public is not considered a necessity. Additionally, the legal culture of the community, particularly community participation, is still poorly understood and needs further development.
Keywords: regional regulations, democratic, local government
References
[1] Saraswati R. Problematika Hukum Undang-Undang No.12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum. 2013;2(3): https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v2i3.10164.
[2] Hamidi J. Paradigma Baru Pembentukan dan Analisis Peraturan Daerah (Studi Atas Perda Pelayanan Publik Dan Perda Keterbukaan Informasi Publik). Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum. 2011;18(3):336–362.
[3] Akbal M. “Harmonisasi Kewenangan Antara Pemerintah Pusat Dan Daerah Dalam Penyelenggaraan Otonomi Daerah.” Jurnal Supremasi. 2016;XI(2).
[4] Setiawan DB. Keberadaan Dan Penerapan Perda Syari’ah Sebagai Perundang- Undangan Pada Tingkat Daerah. Soumatera Law Review. 2018;1(1):67.
[5] Barlian AE. Konsistensi Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah Berdasarkan Hierarki Perundang-Undangan Dalam Prespektif Politik Hukum. FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. 2017;10(4):605.
[6] Taufiqurahman M. Peran Perancang Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Pengawasan Produk Hukum Daerah Melalui Executive. Soumatera Law Review. 2019;2(2):270.
[7] Daniar Pramita RW, Rizal N, Sulistyan RB. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. 2021.
[8] Sugiyono S. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan, Pendekatan Kuantitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2009.
[9] Bik A. “Peraturan Daerah Syariah dalam Bingkai Otonomi Daerah,” al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam. 2013;3(2). https://doi.org/10.15642/ad.2013.3.2.279- 298
[10] S.- Prayitno. “Mekanisme Pembatalan Peraturan Daerah dan Akibat Hukumnya Berdasarkan Asas Lex Superiori Derogat Legi INFERIORI,” Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu : Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan. 2017;8(2). https://doi.org/10.32493/jdmhkdmhk.v8i2.698
[11] Jati R. Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Proses Pembentukan Undang-Undang Yang Responsif. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional. 2012;1(3):329.
[12] Rosidin U. “Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Proses Pembentukan Peraturan Desa yang Aspiratif,” Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum. 2019;4(105).