The Existence of Electronic Evidence in the Settlement of Sharia Economic Disputes in Religious Courts During the Covid-19 Period Based on Positive Law and Islamic Law Perspectives
Abstract
The development of the Sharia economy, accompanied by the wide scope of economic activity in Indonesia, has had a huge influence on the increase in Sharia economic disputes, including during the Covid-19 pandemic. The Supreme Court has responded quickly by issuing various Regulations related to electronic trials to solve the accumulation of cases, especially Sharia economics in the Religious Courts. With this e-court application and electronic trials, it is hoped that it will be able to avoid crowds of people at the court office causing physical contact between justice seekers so it is feared that it could become one of the distribution chains or new clusters of the Covid-19 virus. Electronic information as legal evidence in civil cases is categorized as written evidence. Electronic information or electronic documents are considered valid as long as the information can be accessed, displayed, guaranteed for its integrity, and accounted for so that it can explain a situation. In Islamic law, electronic evidence can be used as evidence because it is included in other evidence according to Islamic law experts. So electronic evidence can be used as evidence in the settlement of Sharia economic disputes, especially in transaction activities using contracts in accordance with Sharia principles such as contracts of buying and selling, leasing, cooperation, debts, and so on.
Keywords: electronic evidence, Sharia economic dispute, Covid-19
References
[1] Witro D, Nuraeni N, Januri MF. “Classification of Aqad in Sharia Economic Law.” Nurani J Kaji Syari’ah dan Masy. 2021;21(1):55–68. https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v21i1.8387.
[2] Tatiana N, Igor K, Liliya S. Principles and instruments of Islamic financial institutions. Procedia Econ Finance. 2015;24:479–484.
[3] Manan A. Pengadilan Agama Cagar Budaya Nusantara Memperkuat NKRI. 2019.
[4] Imaniyati NS, Nu’man AH, Jamilah L. Analysis of the role and responsibility of Sharia supervisory board (DPS) on Sharia compliance supervision in Islamic banks in Indonesia. J. Leg. Ethical Regul. Issues. 2019;22(3).
[5] Al Hakim I. Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Pengadilan Agama. Pandecta Res. Law J. 2014;9(2):273.6. Hernawan F, Abdurohman D. Norma Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syari’ah di Indonesia. Ecopreneur J. Progr. Stud. Ekon. Syariah. 2022;3(1):112.
[6] Imaniyati NS, Januarita R, Mufidi MF, Putra PAA, Susanto YA. “Small claim court in Sharia economic dispute settlement: Overview of Sharia economic principles.” Mimb J Sos dan Pembang., pp. 114–121, Jun. 2022, https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v0i0.8597
[7] Imaniyati NS, Adam P. “Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) NO. 93/PUUX/ 2012 Terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Nonlitigasi Perbankan Syariah,” Pros. SNaPP Sos. Ekon. dan Hum., vol. 5, no. 1, 2015.
[8] Hudawati SN. “Problematika Hukum Formil Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Pengadilan Agama,” J. Penegakan Huk. dan Keadilan, vol. 1, no. 1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.1102
[9] Imaniyati NS, Nurhasanah N, Adam P. “Kompetensi Pengadilan dalam Eksekusi Putusan Basyarnas pada Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Menuju Unifi kasi Hukum.” ADHAPER J Huk Acara Perdata. 2017;3(1).
[10] Mafruh MH, Fasa MI, Ja’far AK. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Pengadilan Agama pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19.” Al-Kharaj J Ekon Keuang Bisnis Syariah. 2021 Nov;4(2):542–556.
[11] Mansur DM, Gultom E. Cyber law: Aspek Hukum Teknologi informasi. Bandung: Refika Aditama; 2005.
[12] Januarita R. “The newly sole proprietorship as limited liability company in recent Indonesian Company Law.” Mimb J Sos dan Pembang. 2021;37(1). https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v37i1.7771
[13] yarifuddin M. Transformasi Digital Persidangan di Era New Normal. 2020.
[14] Yunita A. Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Melalui Mediasi Pada Masa Pandemi di Pengadilan Agama Wilayah Yogyakarta. J. Huk. Ius Quia Iustum. 2021;28(2): https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol28.iss2.art
[15] Makarim E. Pengantar Hukum Telematika: Suatu Kompilasi Kajian. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada; 2005.
[16] Heniyatun H, Iswanto BT, Sulistyaningsih P. Kajian Yuridis Pembuktian dengan Informasi Elektronik dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata di Pengadilan. Varia Justicia. 2018;14(1):30–9.
[17] Basri AH. Alat Bukti Elektronik Menurut Hukum Acara Perdata dan Hukum Islam. Indones J Islam Law. 2020;2(2).