Download fulltext HTML
Sadzali, A., Ghafur, J., & Rishan, I. (2023). Holistic Supervision of the Judges of the Indonesian Constitutional Court. KnE Social Sciences, 8(9), 625–633. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i9.13377

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i9.13377

statistics

  • 74 Abstract Views
  • 60 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • Ahmad Sadzali

    Ahmad Sadzali

    Departement of Constitutional Law, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
    https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2458-9804
  • Jamaludin Ghafur

    Jamaludin Ghafur

    Departement of Constitutional Law, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Idul Rishan

    Idul Rishan

    Departement of Constitutional Law, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Published Date

  • May 26, 2023

Holistic Supervision of the Judges of the Indonesian Constitutional Court

KnE Social Sciences / International Conference on Advance & Scientific Innovation (ICASI) / Pages 625–633

Abstract

The issuance of the latest Constitutional Court Law, Law Number 7 of 2020 on the Third Amendment to Law Number 24 of 2003 on the Constitutional Court, does not bring significant changes in the mechanism for monitoring constitutional court justices and the enforcement of the Code of Ethics and Conduct of Constitutional Justices. This paper aimed to offer a more holistic means of supervising constitutional court judges. The idea is a triangle of supervision consisting of internal control of individual judges, internal control of the institution, and external supervision.


Keywords: Supervision of Judges/Justices, Constitutional Court, Code of Ethics, Judges Integrity 

References
[1] Andrade J, Hamza KM, Xara-Brasil DM. Business ethics: international analysis of codes of ethics and conduct. Rev. Bras. Mark. 2017;16(1):1–15.

[2] Haris A. Pengantar Etika Islam. Sidoarjo: Al-Afkar; 2007.

[3] Rahman SNQ. Etika Profesi Hukum. Refleksi. 2014.

[4] Suriasumantri JS. Filsafat Ilmu: Sebuah Pengantar Populer. Jakarta; 2009.

[5] Kusumohamidjojo B. Teori Hukum: Dilema antara Hukum dan Kekuasaan. Bandung: Penerbit Yrama Widya; 2016.

[6] TriwulanTutik T; T. TriwulanTutik. Pengawasan Hakim Konstitusi Dalam Sistem Pengawasan Hakim Menurut Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Ri 1945. J. Din. Huk. 2012;12(2): https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.2.51.

[7] International Bar Association Code of Minimum Standard of Judicial Independence.

[8] Boccio KM, Cashen M, Joseph A. Schwartz, “The Influence of Low Self-Control and Thoughtfully Reflective Decision Making on Criminal Justice Processing,”. Am J Crim Justice. 2022;47(3):506–25.

[9] J. A. al-F. A. I. al-J. Al-Baghdadi, Shaidu al-Khathir. Beirut: Darul Kutub al-’Ilmiyah, 1992.

[10] Malik, “Perspektif Fungsi Pengawasan Komisi Yudisial Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) Nomor 005/PUU-IV/2006,”. J. Huk. 2007;1(2).

[11] Ashar A. Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial dalam pengangkatan Hakim Agung Berdasarkan pada UU Nomor 22 Tahun 2004 tentang Komisi Yudisial dalam Jurnal DAHA. J. DAHA. 2009;1(42).

[12] Farkašová S. The constitutional reform of the Judicial Council in the Slovak Republic from the European comparative context. Juridical Trib. 2022;12(2).