The Relativity in the Absolute Authority of the Central Government in Religious Affairs
Abstract
The legal policy of the regional government, post-political reform, puts religious affairs under the absolute administrative authority of the central government. However, the development of society requires religious affairs to also be taken care of by the regional government. We argued that there is relativity in the absolute administrative affairs of the central government authority in the scope of religion. This research aimed to analyze and identify the form of relativity in the absolute administration of the central government in religious affairs. Second, the advantages and disadvantages of the absence of certainty related to the absolute administration of the central government in religious affairs were discussed. The method used in the study was legal doctrinal research with statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of the study concluded that the implementation of absolute government administration in the field of religion turned out to be relative, with the involvement of the regional government in managing and regulating religious affairs. This occurs in the affairs of Islamic boarding schools, hajj and umrah, zakat, and the maintenance of religious harmony. Second, there are advantages and disadvantages to the involvement of regional governments in carrying out religious affairs. Among the advantages, namely the financial burden and the activities of the central government in the administration of religious affairs can be assisted by the regional government budget. The weakness was in the regulation and implementation of the absolute government administration in religious affairs by regional governments due to a lack of understanding of the development of government affairs.
Keywords: Relativity, Government Administration, Central Government, Religion
References
[1] Hendratno ET. Desentralisasi yang Mengarah ke Sistem Federal dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Pelaksanaan Fungsi Negara. J. Huk. Internasiona. 2007;4(2). https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol4.2.141.
[2] Bertrand J. Indonesia’s Quasi-Federalist Approach: Accommodation Amid Strong Integrationist Tendencies. Int J Const Law. 2007;5(4):576–605.
[3] Tierney S. Federalism in a Unitary State: A Paradox too Far, Regional & Federal Studies. Routledge. 2009;19(2).
[4] Murjani. Harmonisasi Kewenangan Pusat dan Daerah tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah yang Bernuansa Agama dalam Sistem Otonomi Daerah, Tinjauan Hukum Tata Negara Profetik. Universitas Islam Indonesia. 2007.
[5] FM. Dinamika Pelayanan Haji di Indonesia: Peran Pemerintah Daerah dalam Penyelenggaraan Ibadah Haji di Sulawesi Utara. Jakarta: Badan Litbang dan Diklat Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia.
[6] Saputra DJ. Kewenangan Penyelenggaraan Urusan Pemerintahan Bidang Agama Oleh Pemerintah Pusat Di Daerah Dalam Perspektif Hukum Menurut Undang- Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah. Universitas Sultan Agung Tirtayasa; 2021.
[7] Bangsa KB. Proporsionalitas Pembagian Urusan Pemerintahan Pusat Dan Daerah Dalam Kerangka NKRI. Jakarta; 2021.
[8] Alim M. Perda Bernuansa Syariah dan Hubungannya dengan Konstitusi. J. Huk. 2010;17(1):119–42.
[9] Sanggono B. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada; 2002.
[10] 10. Marzuki PM. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
[11] Suratman and P. Dillah. Metode Penelitian Hukum, Dilengkapi Tata Cara & Contoh Penulisan Karya Ilmiah Bidang Hukum. Bandung: AlfaBeta; 2015.
[12] Sihombing EN, Hadita C. Bentuk Ideal Tindak Lanjut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang. JAPHTN-HAN. 2022;1(1).
[13] K. HAM. Kajian Komnas HAM atas PBM No. 9 dan 8 Tahun 2006 terkait Pendirian Rumah Ibadat. Jakarta. 2020.
[14] Nadeak H. Studi Dana Dekonsentrasi dan Tugas Pembantuan di Lingkungan Kementerian Dalam Negeri. J. Bina Praja. 2012;4(1):45–56.