A Concept of Liability for the Government's Negligence in the Prevention of Wildfires in Indonesia
Abstract
Wildfire is considered an annual problem in Indonesia. Based on the polluter-pays principle, the environmental damage that occurred from the fires must hence be borne by the injurers through the provided liability mechanisms. The Indonesian liability system, however, still focuses merely on how private entities as the bearers of the permits are being held liable, with no attempts to reach other potentially liable parties. The liability system has not considered the governments negligence in the issuance of the permit, fulfilling the statutory duties, or failures to supervise the permitted activities. This research attempts to investigate the concept of government liability for wildfires in Indonesia by analyzing some doctrines and legal principles as the bases for imposing liability in different jurisdictions (the liability trends in developing countries, the US, and the Netherlands). The results are: first, each country adopts its own doctrine and legal principle in imposing liability on their governments. However, in general, most countries acknowledge that they cannot impose liability to the government when they act in terms of discretions, policies, and choices in which they have multiple interests to consider. Second, government liability in Indonesia has been laid down under the Article 1365 of the Civil Code and the Law Number 30 of 2014 on Government Administration. As for the prevention of wildfires, the authors recommend applying the concept of a multi-task/single-task agent to consider to what extent the liability can be held against each government agency based on their statutory duties.
Keywords: liability, government, negligence, wildfires
References
[1] Purnomo H, Okarda B, Shantiko B, Achdiawan R, Dermawan A, Kartodihardjo H, et al. Forest and land fires, toxic haze and local politics in Indonesia. Int For Rev. 2019;21(4):486–500.
[2] Gunadi A, Gunardi G, Martono M. The Law of forest in Indonesia: Prevention and suppression of forest fires. Bina Huk Lingkung. 2019;4(1):113.
[3] Wibisana AG. The many faces of strict liability in Indonesia’s wildfire litigation. Rev Eur Comp Int Environ Law. 2019;28(2):185–196.
[4] Listiningrum P. Transboundary civil litigation for victims of Southeast Asian Haze pollution: access to justice and the non-discrimination principle. Transnatl Environ Law. 2019;8(1):119–142.
[5] Prasetiyo H, Tanjung KT, Jordan J. Penerapan Asuransi Lingkungan Hidup Pada Pemanfaatan Lahan Gambut Di Sektor Kehutanan. J Huk Pembang. 2020;49(4):978.
[6] Faure M. Attribution of liability: An economic analysis of various cases. Chic Kent Law Rev. 2016;91(2):603.
[7] Green MD, Cardi J. The liability of public authorities in the United States. Liabil Public Authorities Comp Perspect. 2017. pp. 537–558.
[8] Barker K, Fairweather K, Grantham R, Law P, Oxford P. Public power, discretion and the duty of care. Priv Law Power; 2017. pp. 1–20.
[9] Luppi B, Parisi F, Rajagopalan S. The rise and fall of the polluter-pays principle in developing countries. Int Rev Law Econ. 2012;32(1):135–44.
[10] Faure M, Raja AV. “Effectiveness of environmental public interest litigation in India: Determining the key variables.” Fordham Environ Law Rev. 2010;21(2):239–292. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpaic.2009.01.006%0A http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17533935%0Ahttp://search.ebscohost. com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2014-14372-001&site=ehostlive% 5Cnjenifer.ware@unt.edu%0Ahttp://www.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj.396.
[11] Belza J. “Inverse condemnation and fracking disasters: Government liability for the environmental consequences of hydraulic fracturing under a constitutional takings theory.” Bost Coll Environ Aff Law Rev. 2017;44(1):55–82. [Online]. Available: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/leedsmet.ac.uk?url=http%3A%2F% 2Fsearch.ebscohost.com%2Flogin.aspx%3Fdirect%3Dtrue%26db%3Da9h%26AN% 3D122437616%26site%3Deds-live%26scope%3Dsite%26authtype%3Dathens
[12] De Geest G. “Who should be immune from tort liability?” J Legal Stud. 2012;May. https://doi.org/10.1086/666479.
[13] de Graaf KJ, Jans JH. Colloquium Article: Liability of Public Authorities in Cases of Non-Enforcement of Environmental Standards. Pace Envtl L Rev. 2007;27(2):377–98.
[14] Keirse A. “Public authority liability in the Netherlands.” in The liability of public authorities in comparative perspective. 2017, pp. 80–86.
[15] Haryati Sukardi NE, Wardana CM. Gugatan perbuatan melawan hukum oleh penguasa (onrechtmatige overheidsdaad): studi putusan Nomor 168/Pdt-g/2018/PN Tjk). JHM. 2018;2(2):64–80.
[16] Dietrich J, Field I. Statute and Theories of Vicarious Liability. Melb Univ Law Rev. 2019;43(2):515–557