Ethnoecological Analysis for Implementation of Inter-organizational Networks in Forest and Land Fires Policy
Abstract
Forest fires are the most detrimental cause of forest destruction because in a short time, they can cause economic, ecological, aesthetic, and political losses. The purpose of this study is to analyze forms of biodiversity conservation carried out by local communities (ethnoecology) of people living in peat areas. This research was conducted in Riau Province, and the method used was qualitative. The unit of analysis in this study is the people who are considered to have knowledge about the implementation of inter-organizational networks in forest and land fire control in Riau Province. The results showed that forest and land fires that occurred in Riau Province were more common in company plantations and the rest occurred in community plantations. Implementation of inter-organizational networks in forest and land fire control in Riau province in the form of standards and objectives, resource policies, inter-organizational communication, and disposition (characteristics of implementing agencies). The recommendation from this research is to control forest and land fires in Riau Province starting from prevention and extinguishing to post-fire recovery, the local government massively socializing land clearing by burning to clear land without burning, as well as providing facilities and infrastructure for prevention, control, and repair after forest and land fires.
Keywords: peatland, policy Implementation, inter-organizational network ethnoecology, forest and land fires
References
[1] Irianti M, Nasrul B, Syahza A. Erosion control in sustainable plantation development efforts in Siak watershed region, Riau province, Indonesia. Asian J Sci Res. 2020;13(4):259-269.
[2] Syahza A, Bakce D, Nasrul B, Mustofa R. Utilization of peatlands based on local wisdom and community welfare in Riau Province, Indonesia. Int J Sustain Dev Plan. 2020 Nov;15(7):1119-1126.
[3] Sutikno S, Rinaldi R, Saputra E, Kusairi M, Saharjo BH, Putra EI. Water management for hydrological restoration and fire prevention in tropical peatland. InIOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2020 Sep 1 (Vol. 933, No. 1, p. 012053). IOP Publishing.
[4] Ratmini S. Karakteristik dan pengelolaan lahan gambut untuk pengembangan pertanian. Jurnal Lahan Suboptimal. 2012;1(2):197-206.
[5] Agus F, Dariah A, Jamil A. Kontroversi pengembangan perkebunan sawit pada lahan gambut. dalam Haryono et al. Politik Pengembangan Pertanian Menghadapi Perubahan Iklim. Hlm. 2013:454-473.
[6] Herman H. Upaya konservasi dan rehabilitasi lahan gambut melalui pengembangan industri perkebunan sagu. Lambung Mangkurat University Press. 2020 Jun 15.
[7] Setiawan, A. Kebijakan Penanganan Kebakaran Hutan dan Lahan di Indonesia. J Political Ecol. 2018 May.
[8] Howlett M, Ramesh M, Perl A. Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford: Oxford university press; 2009.
[9] Weber EP, Lovrich NP, Gaffney M. Collaboration, enforcement, and endangered species: a framework for assessing collaborative problem-solving capacity. Soc Nat Res. 2005 Sep 1;18(8):677-698.
[10] Kapucu N. Non-profit response to catastrophic disasters. Disaster prevention and management: An international journal. 2007 Sep 4.
[11] Kusumasari B. Network organisation in supporting post-disaster management in Indonesia. International Journal of Emergency Services. 2012 Jul 13.
[12] KLHK Dirjen Pegendalian Kebakaran. Panduan Pencegahan Kebakaran Hutan dan Lahan Berbasis Desa di Areal Gambut Seri-5 “Rencana Pencegahan Kebakaran Melalui Pengaktifan Kelompok”. Program of Community Development of Fires Control in Peatland Area, Japan International Cooperation Agency ( JICA). 2015
[13] Susilo YS. Dampak Perhutanan Sosial Terhadap Pendapatan Masyarakat. ISEI Economic Review. 2019 Apr 2;3(1):16-27.
[14] Parsons W. Modernising policy-making for the twenty first century: the professional model. Public Policy and Administration. 2001 Jul;16(3):93-110.
[15] Leach S, Walsh K, Stewart J. The changing organisation and management of local government. Bloomsbury Publishing; 1994 Sep 19.
[16] Syahza A, Kozan O, Sutikno S, Irianti M, Mizuno K, Hosobuchi M. Restorasi ekologi lahan gambut berbasis kelompok masyarakat mandiri melalui revegetasi di Desa Tanjung Leban Kabupaten Bengkalis, Riau. Riau Journal of Empowerment. 2021 Aug 31;4(2):69-81.
[17] Sujadi HA, Purba AR, Lubis MI. Ragam Genetik Kandungan Asam Lemak, Bilangan Iodine Dan Beta Karoten 24 Aksesi Plasma Nutfah Kamerun Koleksi Pusat Penelitian IOP Publishing.
[4] Ratmini S. Karakteristik dan pengelolaan lahan gambut untuk pengembangan pertanian. Jurnal Lahan Suboptimal. 2012;1(2):197-206.
[5] Agus F, Dariah A, Jamil A. Kontroversi pengembangan perkebunan sawit pada lahan gambut. dalam Haryono et al. Politik Pengembangan Pertanian Menghadapi Perubahan Iklim. Hlm. 2013:454-473.
[6] Herman H. Upaya konservasi dan rehabilitasi lahan gambut melalui pengembangan industri perkebunan sagu. Lambung Mangkurat University Press. 2020 Jun 15.
[7] Setiawan, A. Kebijakan Penanganan Kebakaran Hutan dan Lahan di Indonesia. J Political Ecol. 2018 May.
[8] Howlett M, Ramesh M, Perl A. Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford: Oxford university press; 2009.
[9] Weber EP, Lovrich NP, Gaffney M. Collaboration, enforcement, and endangered species: a framework for assessing collaborative problem-solving capacity. Soc Nat Res. 2005 Sep 1;18(8):677-698.
[10] Kapucu N. Non-profit response to catastrophic disasters. Disaster prevention and management: An international journal. 2007 Sep 4.
[11] Kusumasari B. Network organisation in supporting post-disaster management in Indonesia. International Journal of Emergency Services. 2012 Jul 13.
[12] KLHK Dirjen Pegendalian Kebakaran. Panduan Pencegahan Kebakaran Hutan dan Lahan Berbasis Desa di Areal Gambut Seri-5 “Rencana Pencegahan Kebakaran Melalui Pengaktifan Kelompok”. Program of Community Development of Fires Control in Peatland Area, Japan International Cooperation Agency ( JICA). 2015
[13] Susilo YS. Dampak Perhutanan Sosial Terhadap Pendapatan Masyarakat. ISEI Economic Review. 2019 Apr 2;3(1):16-27.
[14] Parsons W. Modernising policy-making for the twenty first century: the professional model. Public Policy and Administration. 2001 Jul;16(3):93-110.
[15] Leach S, Walsh K, Stewart J. The changing organisation and management of local government. Bloomsbury Publishing; 1994 Sep 19.
[16] Syahza A, Kozan O, Sutikno S, Irianti M, Mizuno K, Hosobuchi M. Restorasi ekologi lahan gambut berbasis kelompok masyarakat mandiri melalui revegetasi di Desa Tanjung Leban Kabupaten Bengkalis, Riau. Riau Journal of Empowerment. 2021 Aug 31;4(2):69-81.
[17] Sujadi HA, Purba AR, Lubis MI. Ragam Genetik Kandungan Asam Lemak, Bilangan Iodine Dan Beta Karoten 24 Aksesi Plasma Nutfah Kamerun Koleksi Pusat Penelitian