Improvement Licensing Services based Digital on Building Management Information System (SIMBG)

Abstract

The current global trend demands better public services in the digital era and it is a challenge for the bureaucracy to adapt to a very fast-changing external environment by maintaining public trust, toward digital services, increasing the use of technology, and building new competencies for bureaucracies and organizations that are more agile. One of the licensing services with digital services is the Building Management Information System (SIMBG). The new SIMBG service brings problems because the implementing regulations and the capacity of the SIMBG Implementing Office are not yet ready. This study aims to solve the problem of implementing licensing through SIMBG in the regions at the beginning of the implementation of new building regulations. The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative. Primary data collection through interviews with the staff of the Implementing Agency and secondary data. Data analysis entails performing data reduction steps, data presentation, and drawing conclusions or verification. The results showed that the implementation of SIMBG was appropriate and needed to increase the capacity of the SIMBG Implementing Office and the Settlement of Retribution Regional Regulations and Implementing Regulations and to increase the issuance of PBG and SLF.


Keywords: bureaucracy, licensing, capacity

References
[1] Putra YS. ”Theoritical review: Teori perbedaan generasi.” Among makarti. 2017;9(2).

[2] Faizah U, Suwandi S, Andayani AR. Opportunities for increasing competence through Da’wah Media in the Industrial Revolution Era 4.0. J Xi’an Univ Archit Technol. 2020;12(7).

[3] Alter S. The work system method for understanding information systems and information systems research. Comm Assoc Inform Syst. 2002;9(1). https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00906

[4] Goggin ML, Bowman AO, Lester JP. Implementation theory and practice: Toward a third generation. Scott Foresman & Company; 1990.

[5] O’Toole LJ Jr. Policy recommendations for multi-actor implementation: an assessment of the field. J Public Policy. 1986;6(2):181–210.

[6] Gardenghi JL, Pereira LG, Alcantara SM, Figueiredo RM, Ramos CS, Ribeiro LC Jr. Digitalization by means of a prototyping process: The case of a Brazilian Public Service. Information (Basel). 2020;11(9):413.

[7] Tasyah A, Septiya S, Putri SJ, Fernanda RA, Azani PC. ”Best practice kebijakan egovernment dalam mengimplementasikan pelayanan publik di era new normal.” Jurnal Studi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik. 2021;1(1):21-https://doi.org/10.35912/jasispol.v1i1.163.

[8] Astuti SJ, Endarti E, Wardani A, Mujiati M. Increasing the capacity building program based on local wisdom (Case study in Kepatihan Village, Gresik Regency).” BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Dan Organisasi. 2021;28(3)

[9] Darma IP, Astana IN, Dewi AD. ANALISIS KEPUASAN MASYARAKAT TERHADAP PELAYANAN IMB MELALUI APLIKASI SIMBG DI KOTA DENPASAR. Jurnal Spektran. 2022;10(1):44–51.

[10] Rizky IP, Darma A, Astana IN, Dewi AA. MELALUI APLIKASI SIMBG DI KOTA DENPASAR THE ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC SATISFACATION LEVEL OF IMB SERVICE THROUGH SIMBG APPLICATION IN DENPASAR CITY. 2022;10(1):44–51.

[11] Sugiono PD. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2015.

[12] Cresswell JW. Research design: pendekatan metode kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan campuran. (Terjemahan Achmad Fawaid & Rianayati Kusmini Pancasari). Sage Publication, Ltd; 2016.

[13] Yin RK. Studi kasus: Desain & metode.

[14] Noviyanti F, Djunaedi A. Tipologi Pelaksanaan Kegiatan Smart City Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 (Kasus : kota Yogyakarta). Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Dan Praktek Administrasi. 2021;18(2):225–236.

[15] Rachman I. Aktivitas, Tugas Dan Fungsi Dprd Dalam Penentuan Kinerja Di Kantor Dprd Kabupaten Minahasa Utara. Jurnal Administrasi Publik; 2018.

[16] Ali M. ”Pengaruh Kompetensi Dimoderasi Oleh Teknologi Informasi Komunikasi Terhadap Kinerja Pelayanan Publik.” Sebatikl. 2020;24(1). https://doi.org/10.46984/sebatik.v24i1.

[17] Anggraini AO, Sulistyaningsih T, Hijri YS. ”Pelayanan Birokrat Garis Depan (Street Level Bureucrat) dalam Layanan Parkir Berlangganan di Kabupaten Jombang.” Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan. 2020;13(1).

[18] Zhang H, Yang L, Walker R, Wang Y. How to influence the professional discretion of street-level bureaucrats: transformational leadership, organizational learning, and professionalization strategies in the delivery of social assistance. Public Manage Rev. 2022;24(2):208–232.

[19] Kusnandar I. ”Pengaruh Implementasi Kebijakan terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Izin Mendirikan Bangunan.” Disertasi. Bandung PPs UNPAD,

[20] Purwanto EA, Sulistyastuti DR. Implementasi kebijakan publik: konsep dan aplikasinya di Indonesia. Gava Media; 2012.

[21] Meitha A, Sasmito C. Pengaruh kepemimpinan, Kedisiplinan dan Komunikasi terhadap Pelayanan Publik di Puskesmas Kabupaten Sambas. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik. 2016;5(3):109–114.

[22] Riau DP, Yuswadi H. Improvement strategy policy implementation the certificate of building operability in Probolinggo City. Int J Manag Admin Sci. 2014;3(9):37–47.

[23] Riau DP. Sertifikat Laik fungsi Bangunan Gedung: Implementasi Kebijakan Perizinan Pemanfaatan Bangunan Gedung di Daerah. Zifatama Jawara; 2019.