The Role of Actors in Managing Collaborative Tourism in Indonesia
Abstract
This article describes the role of actors in managing tourism collaboration in Indonesia in general and cases related to tourism management in the Rammang Ramming tourist village, Maros Regency. Collaboration in the management of tourist areas involves several elements, namely the tourism office, tourism awareness communities, private sector, residents in tourism areas, and community leaders. This study is interesting in the context of actor networks that have been described so far, such as collaboration problems in actor networks often occur so far due to their dependence on existing resources. This paper uses qualitative research methods in the form of descriptive analysis where this research describes the conditions of each role in collaboration for the management of the Rammang-Rammang Tourism area. The results of this study found that the knowledge and resource factors possessed by each actor in the network have become crucial in implementing management in the form of collaboration between actors to run well. The knowledge and resources possessed by each actor become an important key in determining the role of managing the Rammang-Rammang Tourism area.
Keywords: actor role, managing collaboration, tourism
References
[1] Kusworo HA, Damanik J. PENGEMBANGAN SDM PARIWISATA DAERAH : Agenda Kebijakan untuk Pembuat Kebijakan. J Ilmu Sos dan Ilmu Polit. 2002;6(1):105–120.
[2] Jupir MM. IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN PARIWISATA BERBASIS KEARIFAN LOKAL (Studi di Kabupaten Manggarai Barat). Program Magister, Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi, Universitas Brawijaya; 2013.
[3] Moenir HD. Implementasi ASEAN Tourism Strategic Paln 2011-2015 dalam Kebijakan Pariwisata Indonesia di Masa Pemerintahan Jokowi. Andalas J Int Stud [Internet]. 2017;6(1):57–78. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410. 2015.1044943{%}0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.581{%}0Ahttps: //publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/2547ebf4-bd21-46e8- 88e9-f53c1b3b927f/language-en{%}0Ahttp://europa.eu/.{%}0Ahttp://www.leg.st
[4] Nizar MA. PENGARUH PARIWISATA TERHADAP PERTUMBUHAN EKONOMI DI INDONESIA. 2011.
[5] Klenk NL, Hickey GM. Improving the social robustness of research networks for sustainable natural resource management: Results of a delphi study in Canada. Sci Public Policy [Internet]. 2012;39(3):357– 372. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2. 0-84871442822&doi=10.1093{%}2Fscipol{%}2Fscs024&partnerID=40&md5= bb6ba96108e54d21c582dd44da47aaaf
[6] Fahad HA, Endrayadi EC. PENGEMBANGAN SEKTOR PARIWISATA DI KABUPATEN BANYUWANGI TAHUN 2002-2013. Publika Budaya [Internet]. 2017 Dec 5 [cited 2022 Nov 26];5(1):28–35. Available from: https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/PB/article/view/5982
[7] D’Angella F, Management FG-T, 2009 undefined. Tale of two cities’ collaborative tourism marketing: Towards a theory of destination stakeholder assessment. Elsevier [Internet]. [cited 2022 Nov 26]; Available from: https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261517708001209?casa_token=H0WA0m35T1wAAAAA: -jpIEjqn7TE503PTQTy9Mu97nILhl6yfYdzB2JKAYvTUoGLAlbBmMViyEnE1jNiDo8ZonnvN2IJv
[8] Lemmetyinen A, Management FG-T, 2009 undefined. The key capabilities required for managing tourism business networks. Elsevier [Internet]. [cited 2022 Nov 26]; Available from: https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261517708000770?casa_token=twpvUEVgYvgAAAAA: u9Lad3Qhft61swH4gsziitmF6p6_UAzLjW0qFqgJ2wXoPYSr6Es0jpC05VqozjODwzPzhU6_Ev0K
[9] Novelli M, Schmitz B, Management TS-T, 2006 undefined. Networks, clusters and innovation in tourism: A UK experience. Elsevier [Internet]. [cited 2022 Nov 26]; Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0261517705001913?casa_token=v-Ed28KcZpMAAAAA:7_EKntMlF6Wlq6xZazHOO-CKO_ 1GblM61Su8lUl0VoadYH9VYYFuBj1S4pSzWJeRZELqS9AhKNl
[10] Aas C, Ladkin A, Research JF-A of tourism, 2005 undefined. Stakeholder collaboration and heritage management. Elsevier [Internet]. [cited 2022 Nov 26]; Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0160738304001021?casa_token=xwEygfk5GoQAAAAA: rGBahYV68MRYN5SmVmvlBpZE-fylaMOib_GoHd8MOZc5ahu4BiYHylE8tMkp8- IDvu-uAd-Dmm06
[11] Reverte C. The importance of institutional differences among countries in SDGs achievement: A cross-country empirical study. Sustain Dev [Internet]. 2022; Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85133961118&doi= 10.1002{%}2Fsd.2354&partnerID=40&md5=74f9bb0512f205cf8c6bbfb209c90d32
[12] Management PX-T, 2006 undefined. Developing industrial heritage tourism: A case study of the proposed jeep museum in Toledo, Ohio. Elsevier [Internet]. [cited 2022 Nov 26]; Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0261517705000853?casa_token=il9I29PTC-EAAAAA:jY9GgY58b_Dx24JN9jUxaRDCogl3nWjyLflt2bIrE7jmB7HJKZiKAWWXc6NBHAWivkXw50Nl3GZ
[13] Ryan C. Equity, management, power sharing and sustainability-issues of the “new tourism.” Tour Manag. 2002;23(1):17–26.
[14] Zhou L. Online rural destination images: Tourism and rurality. J Destin Mark Manag [Internet]. 2014;3(4):227–240. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2014.03.002
[15] Latour B. From realpolitik to dingpolitik. Mak things public Atmos Democr. 2005;14– 41.
[16] Koontz TM, Johnson EM. One size does not fit all: Matching breadth of stakeholder participation to watershed group accomplishments. Policy Sci. 2004;37(2):185–204.
[17] Frederickson DG. Measuring the performance of the hollow state. Georgetown University Press; 2006.
[18] Rohim NF, Ahmadin, Ridha MR. Objek Wisata Rammang-Rammang Kabupaten Maros. 2021;19(2):132–141.
[19] Donald F. Kettl. Managing Boundaries in American Administration: The Collaboration Imperative. Public Administration Review. 2006:10-19. Available from: Kettl Managing Boundaries in Administration.pdf (csus.edu).