Download fulltext HTML
., B., Martua, J., & Pratiwi, I. (2023). Restrictions on Land Ownership For Citizens by States Adhering to Pancasila Ideology, Islamism and Communism. KnE Social Sciences, 8(4), 499–508. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i4.12936

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i4.12936

statistics

  • 137 Abstract Views
  • 94 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • Bahmid .

    Bahmid .

    Faculty of Law, Asahan University
  • Junindra Martua

    Junindra Martua

    Faculty of Law, Asahan University
  • Irda Pratiwi

    Irda Pratiwi

    Faculty of Law, Asahan University

Published Date

  • Mar 3, 2023

Restrictions on Land Ownership For Citizens by States Adhering to Pancasila Ideology, Islamism and Communism

KnE Social Sciences / 2nd Paris Van Java International Seminar on Health, Economics, Social Science and Humanities (PVJ-ISHESSH 2021) / Pages 499–508

Abstract

Land is a necessity that cannot be separated in everyone’s life. The need for land continues to increase, but its availability is very limited. Meanwhile, the number of human growth continues to increase. So that almost all countries place land property as part of private law, but the ownership provisions are regulated by the state in public law. The focus of this research is to find out how the legal comparison of the boundaries of ownership of land rights and that of a country, by assessing the ideological values applied to a country, especially countries that adhere to Pancasila, Communism and Islamism. The aim of this research is to find the comparison of land ownership limits for every citizen who adheres to the ideology of Pancasila, Islamism and Communism, which prevails in a country. The research method used is normative legal research, which is a doctrinal research that examines the opinions of experts and legal documents or is also known as legal research.


Keywords: Pancasila ideology; restrictions; Islamism; Communism; ideological values

References
[1] Herawati Y. The concept of social justice in the fifth precepts of pancasila. Paradigm. 2014;18(1):20–27. http://jurnal.upnyk.ac.id/index.php/paradigma/article/download/ 2404/2042.

[2] Fattah D. Teori keadilan menurut John Rawl. Islamic Political Aspiration Binoculars. 2013;9(2):30–45. https://doi.org/10.24042/tps.v9i2.1589.

[3] Fitriani R. Pemilikan tanah presfektif Islam. Al-Mabsut. 2011;2(1). https://ejournal.iaingawi.ac.id/index.php/almabsut/article/view/44.

[4] Nazsir N. Communism is a utopia in the age of globalization: A historical review of the thought of Karl Marx. A Historical Review of the Thought of Karl Marx 2. 2001;2:245–65.

[5] Marx K. The manifesto of the communist party by Karl Marx is publication. 1848.

[6] Teguh Rianto SHMH. Pakuan Law Review. 2015;1(2):61–112.

[7] Teguh Rianto SHMH. Pakuan Law Review. 2015;1(2):61–112.

[8] Kaharman B. Pemilikan tanah pertanian secara absentee dan pertanggung jawaban hukum badan pertanahan kabupaten boalemo atas penerbitan sertifikat (Studi kasus di kecamatan paguyaman kabupaten boalemo). 2016:147;11–40.

[9] Afzalurrahman. Islamic economic doctrine, II Terj. Nastangin. Yogyakarta: Dana Bhakti Wakaf; 1995.

[10] Mannan A. Theory and practice of islamic economics. Wakaf DB, editor. Yogyakarta; 1997.

[11] Vincent P. Saudi Arabia: An environmental overview. 2008.

[12] Rachmawati F. Criticism of the ideological concept of communism by Karl Marx. Journal of the Sociology of Religion of Indonesia ( JSAI). 2020;1(1):66–78. https://doi.org/10.22373/jsai.v1i1.424.

[13] Darmawan D. Apa dan bagaima komunisme? (Part 1). 2017 March 22. Medan Headline News. Available from: https://medanheadlines.com/2017/03/22/apa-danmengapa- komunisme-bagian-1/.