Criminal Policy Needed for the Recovery of Socio-Political Conditions for National Resilience Following the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract

The Large-Scale Social Restriction Policy (PSBB), later changed to the Enforcement of Community Activity Restrictions (PPKM), prohibits people from gathering. Restrictions on activities inside the community have impacted social life, including law enforcement. Criminal law enforcement must adhere to Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code, which explicitly regulates the stages of criminal law enforcement in Indonesia. All these stages share something in common - a form of face-to-face examination of all subjects of criminal procedural law. Thus, there exists a problem in extraordinary circumstances. This study aims to identify criminal law enforcement policies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia to realize the Restoration of the Socio-Political Condition of National Resilience after the COVID-19 Pandemic. This research used a qualitative descriptive approach. The results of this study indicated that Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law as the basis for criminal proceedings (lex generalis) only conducts face-to-face examinations in criminal proceedings. Since COVID-19, there has been no regulation regarding online examinations, thus creating a legal vacuum (rechtsvakum) that needs to be filled. Discretion or criminal policy is needed to overcome problems, so the Attorney General’s Office, the Supreme Court, and the Ministry of Law and Human Rights on April 13, 2020, Award of Cooperation Agreement (PKS) for the Implementation of Trials Through Teleconferencing during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Keywords: Criminal Policy, National Resilience, COVID-19 pandemic

References
[1] Putri GS. WHO Resmi Sebut Virus Corona COVID-19 sebagai Pandemi Global. Kompas.com. 2020. p. 1–1.

[2] Wiswayana WM. Wabah COVID-19 di Indonesia: Ancaman dan Sistem Pertahanan Negara. Glokalisasi: Gerakan Sosial, Kewargaan dan Komunitas Lokal; 2020.

[3] Hadiwardoyo W. Kerugian Ekonomi Nasional Akibat Pandemi COVID-19. Baskara J Bus Entrep. 2020;2(2):83–92.

[4] Thorik SH. Efektivitas pembatasan sosial berskala besar di indonesia dalam penanggulangan pandemi COVID-19. Adalah. 2020;4(1):115–20.

[5] Clarke L. An introduction to economic studies, health emergencies, and COVID-19. J Evid Based Med. 2020 May;13(2):161–7.

[6] Lemhannas. Ketahanan Nasional. In: Modul 1. Jakarta; 2008.

[7] Mokodongan VSR. Kebijakan Pemerintah dalam penerapan new normal pasca PSBB akibat wabah pandemi COVID-19. Lex Adm. 2021;9(4).

[8] Saputra AO, Mahardika SE, Pujiyono P. Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Untuk Mengurangi Overcrowded Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19. J USM Law Rev. 2021;4(1):326–42.

[9] Moleong LJ. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Edisi Revisi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya; 2009.

[10] Sugiyono D. Metode penelitian pendidikan. 2014.

[11] Sugiono. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Cetakan 6. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2008. 456 pp.

[12] Roselle L. Research and writing in international relations. Routledge; https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315508498.

[13] Huda NM. Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo; 2006.

[14] Asshiddiqie J. Penegakan Hukum. Penegakan Huk; 2016. p. 3. [15] Arif BN. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana.

[16] Ariman R, Pettanasse SR. Kebijakan Kriminal. Palembang: Universitas Sriwijaya; 2008.

[17] Risdiarto D. Kebijakan Dan Strategi Pembangunan Hukum Dalam Memperkuat Ketahanan Nasional. J Penelit Huk Jure. 2017;17(2):177–93.

[18] GitHub I. GitHub - CSSEGISandData/COVID-19: Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Cases, provided by JHU CSSE.

[19] Napolitano A. Judge Andrew Napolitano: Coronavirus fear lets government assault our freedom in violation of Constitution [Internet]. Fox News. 2020 [cited 2022 Aug 18]. Available from: https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/judge-andrew-napolitanoliberty-coronavirus

[20] Merdeka.com. Polri Sebut Gangguan Keamanan Selama Masa Pandemi COVID-19 Meningkat | merdeka.com. 2020.

[21] Razaq NA. Legalitas Persidangan Daring Di Masa Pandemi Covid—19 Dalam Pespektif Hukum Pidana. J Inov Penelit. 2020;1(6):1227–30.

[22] Mulyadi L. Balipost. 2003.

[23] Iswantoro W. Persidangan Pidana Secara Online, Respon Cepat Menghadapi Pandemi COVID-19. Selisik. 2020;6(1):56–63.

[24] Atamimi HW. Keabsahan Hasil Pemeriksaan Saksi Melalui Teleconference Pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19. Jember; 2021.

[25] BPHN. Dokumen Pembangunan Hukum Nasional Tahun 2016 [Internet]. Vol. 8091908. 2016. 1–389 p. Available from: https://www.bphn.go.id/data/documents/dphn2016_watermark.pdf

[26] Kusumaatmadja M. Pembinaan Hukum Dalam Rangka Pembangunan Hukum Nasional. Penerbit Bina Cipta. Bandung: Tahun; 1986.

[27] Friedman LM. Hukum Amerika Sebuah Pengantar. Diterjemahkan oleh Wishnu Basuki Jakarta Tatanusa. 2001.

[28] Sinta Dewi HT. Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Keterangan Saksi Melalui Audio Visual (Teleconference) di Persidangan Perkara Pidana. Jakarta Univ Indones; 2012.

[29] Khoiruddin A. Relevansi Hukum Progresif Terhadap Hukum Islam. Semarang: IAIN Walisongo.