Evaluation of Community Participation in Restoration Efforts Following the Merapi Volcano Eruptions in Muntilan, Magelang
Abstract
Disasters due to the frequent eruptions of Mount Merapi have attracted great attention. For example, from the beginning of 2020 to June 21, 2020, 10 eruptions brought panic to the community. To avoid the unpreparedness of the community when a disaster occurs, the government and the private sector have provided programs to the victims. The program is running at the optimal planning and implication stage. However, in the next stage, programs that involve the active participation of affected communities run at a low level. This study uses a qualitative descriptive method to produce in-depth data from local government informants and community leaders who are victims of disasters and develop post-disaster reconstruction programs. Data collection techniques included in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation of appropriate and required data. The results of this study include, in Muntilan District, Magelang Regency, there has been a community recovery program in the form of post-disaster emergency assistance, as well as other economic recovery programs to restore life to normal. Initially, the handling of the community’s economic recovery program did not go as expected. Many aids were given directly to the community but were not useful due to obstacles in the field; The results of the evaluation of the level of community participation in Magelang Regency, in general, can be classified as very low in post-disaster development programs.
Keywords: eruption, aid program, normal life, participation
References
[1] Istiyanto SB. Model Terpadu Pemulihan Ekonomi Masyarakat Kawasan Obyek Wisata Pantai Pasca Bencana. Ilmiah Pariwisata Sekolah Tinggi Pariwisata Trisakti. 2010;15(2).
[2] Suhendi A. Korban Tewas Letusan Gunung Merapi Menjadi 194. Retrieved from https://www.tribunnews.com/regional/2010/11/11/korban-tewas-letusan-gunungmerapi- menjadi-194; 2010.
[3] Sari NL. Partisipasi Masyarakat Kecamatan Cangkringan. Yogyakarta: UNY; 2016.
[4] Yusfida I. Partisipasi Masyarakat Pada Kawasan Rawan Bencana Di Indonesia (Pra Bencana, Tanggap Darurat Dan Pasca Bencana). Bogor: ITB; 2014.
[5] Herutomo C, Istiyanto SB. Program Pemulihan Ekonomi Masyarakat Pasca Bencana Erupsi Gunung Merapi di Kabupaten Klaten Jawa Tengah. Purwokerto: Jurnal Acta Diurna. 2015;11(2).
[6] Marbun, B.N. Kamus Politik. Jakarta: CV. Muliasari; 2012.
[7] Isbandi RA. Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Bidang Kesehatan. Jakarta: Depkes; 2016.
[8] Mikkelsen B. Metode Penelitian Partisipatoris dan Upaya-Upaya Pemberdayaan: Sebuah Buku Pegangan Bagi Para Praktisi Lapangan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia; 2013.
[9] Conyers D. Perencanaan Sosial di Dunia Ketiga, Suatu Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press; 1994.
[10] Istiyanto SB. Komunikasi Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Ilmu; 2016.
[11] Moleong LJ. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Rosda; 2017. [12] Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2017.
[13] Andayani TT. Dana Sumbangan Masyarakat untuk Pembangunan Ekonomi Pasca Bencana Merapi. Jurnal Penanggulangan Bencana. 2011;2(1).
[14] Arismastuti A. Tahapan Proses Komunikasi Fasilitator Dalam Sosialisasi Pengurangan Resiko Bencana. Jurnal Penanggulangan Bencana. 2011;2(2).