Quo Vadis: Establishment of a Land Bank after the Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020

Abstract

This study aims to examine and analyze the formation of a land bank after the Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, which was declared conditionally unconstitutional. The research method used is normative juridical research, which involves examining and inventorying various secondary data, namely library research. Based on the results of the research and discussion, it can be concluded that, first, the existence of a land bank, which is included in the cluster of Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation, makes it relatively difficult to carry out its duties and authorities because, as the Constitutional Court stated in Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, it was declared conditionally unconstitutional, so the government was prohibited from enacting implementing regulations or derivative regulations from a quo. Second, the government should comply with the decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia as a check and balance; therefore, the DPR and the President must first improve the Job Creation Law so that land banks can carry out their functions and authorities.


Keywords: constitutional court, land, land bank

References
[1] Al Zahra F. Konstruksi Hukum Pengaturan Bank Tanah Untuk Mewujudkan Pengelolaan Aset Tanah Negara Berkeadilan. Arena Huk. 2017;10(3):357–84.

[2] Zakie M. Konflik Agraria Yang Tak Pernah Reda. J Ilm Huk Leg. 2017;24(1):40–55.

[3] Sulistio M. Politik hukum pertanahan Di Indonesia. J Educ Dev. 2020;8(2):105–11.

[4] Lainsamputty N, Soplantila R, Hetharie Y. Omnibus Law Sebagai Strategi Penataan Regulasi Pertanahan. J Saniri. 2020;1(1):34–43.

[5] Jodi Wiranto M, Redi A. Urgensi Undang-Undang Tentang Lembaga Kepresidenan Dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Republik Indonesia Dikaitkan Dengan Eksistensi Undang-Undang Lembaga-Lembaga Negara Lainnya. J Huk Adigama. 2021;4(2):1895–914.

[6] Al Zahra F. Gagasan Pengaturan Bank Tanah untuk Mewujudkan Pengelolaan Aset Tanah Negara yang Berkeadilan. J Ilm Adm Publik. 2017;3(2):92–101.

[7] Damen J. Land Banking in the Netherlands in the context of land consolidation. Int Work L Banking/l Funds as an Instrum Improv L Manag CEEC CIS. 2004;1–5.

[8] Suyudi B, Suhattanto MA. Pembentukan Bank Tanah Dan Permasalahannya Di Indonesia. Laporan Penelitian; 2018.

[9] Bukido R, Lahilote HS, Irwansyah I. Pengawasan terhadap Bank Tanah: Urgensi, Kewenangan, dan Mekanisme. Undang J Huk. 2021;4(1):191–211.

[10] Dave B. Konsep Bank Tanah dalam Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja - LBH “Pengayoman” UNPAR [Internet]. LBH Pengayoman Universitas Katolik Parahyangan. 2021 [cited 2022 Mar 31]. Available from: https://lbhpengayoman.unpar.ac.id/konsepbank- tanah-dalam-undang-undang-cipta-kerja/

[11] Ganindha R. Urgensi Pembentukan Kelembagaan Bank Tanah Sebagai Alternatif Penyediaan Tanah Bagi Masyarakat Untuk Kepentingan Umum. Arena Huk. 2016;9(3):442–62.

[12] Said M. Proyek Kereta Api Sulsel Terkendala Pembebasan Lahan di Makassar [Internet]. Sonora.id. 2022 [cited 2022 Jul 22]. Available from: https://www.sonora.id/read/423341464/proyek-kereta-api-sulsel-terkendalapembebasan- lahan-di-makassar

[13] Ismoyo B. Proyek Kereta Cepat Jakarta-Bandung Terkendala Pembebasan Lahan di Tiga Lokasi, Nih Daftarnya! [Internet]. WartaEkonomi.co.id. 2019 [cited 2022 Jul 22]. Available from: https://www.wartaekonomi.co.id/read245970/proyek-keretacepat- jakarta-bandung-terkendala-pembebasan-lahan-di-tiga-lokasi-nih-daftarnya

[14] Marduwo J. Terkendala Pembebasan Lahan, Proyek Tol Jogya-Solo Baru Mencapai 10 Persen - Suara Merdeka Solo [Internet]. Suara Merdeka Solo. 2021 [cited 2022 Jul 22]. Available from: https://solo.suaramerdeka.com/solo-raya/pr- 051211039/terkendala-pembebasan-lahan-proyek-tol-jogya-solo-baru-mencapai-10- persen

[15] Zakka Arrizal N, Wulandari S. Kajian Kritis Terhadap Eksistensi Bank Tanah Dalam Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja Critical Assessment of the Existence of Land Banks in Law Number 11 of 2020 Concerning Job Creation. Keadilan [Internet]. 2020;18(2):99–110, hlm 103. Available from: https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5f8

[16] Thea DA. Guru Besar FH UGM Persoalkan Terbitnya Perpres Struktur Bank Tanah [Internet]. Hukumonline.com. 2022 [cited 2022 Apr 1]. Available from: https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/guru-besar-fh-ugm-persoalkanterbitnya- perpres-struktur-bank-tanah-lt620499cd58a7b

[17] Thea DA. Guru Besar FH UGM Sebut Perpres Struktur Bank Tanah Langgar Putusan MK [Internet]. Hukumonline.com. 2022 [cited 2022 Apr 1]. Available from: https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/guru-besar-fh-ugm-sebut-perpresstruktur- bank-tanah-langgar-putusan-mk-lt61d44f44c4a14/

[18] Hentikan Pembentukan Bank Tanah | KPA - Konsorium Pembaruan Agraria [Internet]. [cited 2022 May 27]. Available from: http://kpa.or.id/media/baca2/siaran_pers/230/ Hentikan_Pembentukan_Bank_Tanah/

[19] Jason F, Tan D. Kepastian Hukum Bagi Penanam Modal Asing Sehubungan Dengan Inkonstitusional Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja. Unes Law Rev. 2022;4(3):367–82.

[20] Fudin H. Aktualisasi Checks And Balances Lembaga Negara: Antara Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat dan Mahkamah Konstitusi. J Konstitusi. 2022;19(1):202– 24.