Punctuated Equilibrium Policy of Village Government Budget Following the Pandemic
Abstract
The pandemic has resulted in changes to public policy, particularly in public budgeting. This is the case not only at the central level but also at local and village government levels. The challenge of changing public policy also occurs in the fiscal policy sector. Village governments are required to reallocate their budgets for activities to handle the pandemic and post-pandemic economic recovery. Hence, this article aims to describe changes in village government budgeting policy changes from the perspective of punctuated equilibrium in public policy studies. The data in this study were obtained through focus group discussions and secondary data collection. The study found that the political equilibrium of a policy cannot last forever. Policy changes occur if there is a change in the agreement between policy-making actors. Public policy changes have so far been understood to occur slowly and gradually. However, this article proves that it can occur drastically and within a short period of time.
Keywords: fiscal decentralization, local autonomy, policy change, public finance, punctuated equilibrium public policy, rural local government budget
References
[1] Benach J. We Must Take Advantage of This Pandemic to Make a Radical Social Change: The Coronavirus as a Global Health, Inequality, and Eco-Social Problem. Int J Health Serv. 2021 Jan;51(1):50–4.
[2] Donnelly GF. Pandemics and Social Change. Vol. 34. Holist Nurs Pract. 2020.
[3] Pleyers G. The pandemic and social change: Interpreting the crisis to overcome it. Futur Anal Prospect. 2021;(440).
[4] Purnama DT, Juliansyah V, Chainar. Covid-19 Pandemic, Social Changes and Its Consequences in Society. J ilmu Sos dan Hum. 2020;25(1).
[5] Elbazidi H, Erraih O. Pandemic and social changes, political fate. New Microbes New Infect. 2020.
[6] Frisina Doetter L, Preuß B, Frisina PG. The Intersections of Pandemic, Public Policy and Social Inequality in the United States. Forum Soc Econ. 2022;51(2):220–34.
[7] Peci A, Avellaneda CN, Suzuki K. Governmental responses to covid-19 pandemic. Rev Adm Pública. 2021;55(1):1–11.
[8] Alshoubaki W, Harris M. Jordan’s Public Policy Response to COVID-19 Pandemic: Insight and Policy Analysis. Public Organ Rev. 2021;21(4):687–706.
[9] Bleich MR, Smith S, McDougle R. Public policy in a pandemic: A call for leadership action. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2020 Jun;51(6):250–2.
[10] Gamboa-Antiñolo FM. Pandemic, public policy and ethics. Vol. 35. Gac Sanit. 2021;35(2):208.
[11] Sawyer M. Economic Policies and the Coronavirus Crisis in the UK. Rev Polit Econ. 2021;33(3):414–31.
[12] Lo SN, Skarbek A, Capon A. Recovery from the pandemic: evidence-based public policy to safeguard health. Med J Aust. 2020 Sep;213(6):284–284.e1.
[13] Romer CD. The Fiscal Policy Response to the Pandemic. Vol. Spring 2021. Brookings Pap Econ Act. 2021.
[14] Hutchison MM. The global pandemic, policy space and fiscal rules to achieve stronger stabilization policies. Seoul J Econ. 2020;33(3).
[15] Hausmann R, Schetter U. Horrible trade-offs in a pandemic: Poverty, fiscal space, policy, and welfare. World Dev. 2022;153:153.
[16] Faria Castro M. Fiscal Policy during a Pandemic Working Paper Series Fiscal Policy during a Pandemic. J Econ Lit. 2020;(May).
[17] Faria-e-Castro M. Fiscal policy during a pandemic. J Econ Dyn Control. 2021:125.
[18] Yuwono TP. Membedah Potensi dan Tantangan Dana Desa Tahun 2022 [Internet]. Berita Direktorat Jenderal Perbendaharaan Kementerian Keuangan RI. 2022 [cited 2022 Aug 8]. Available from: https://djpb.kemenkeu.go.id/portal/id/berita/lainnya/opini/3840-membedahpotensi- dan-tantangan-dana-desa-tahun-2022.html
[19] Supriyanto E. Peran Dana Desa dalam Pemulihan Ekonomi Nasional dan Penanganan Covid-19 [Internet]. Berita Direktorat Perbendaharaan Kementerian Keuangan RI. 2022 [cited 2022 Aug 8]. Available from: https://djpb.kemenkeu.go.id/portal/id/berita/lainnya/opini/3854-peran-danadesa- dalam-pemulihan-ekonomi-nasional-dan-penanganan-covid-19.html
[20] Botterill LC, Fenna A. Interrogating Public Policy Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2019. 208 pp. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784710088.
[21] Arara E, Fritzen S, Howlett M, Ramesh M, Wu X. Routledge Handbook of Public Policy. 1st Editio. London: Routledge; 2012. 546 pp. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203097571.
[22] Peters BG, Pierre J. Handbook of Public Policy. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2006. 1–512 p. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608054.
[23] Vickers J, Yarrow G. Economic Perspectives on Privatization. J Econ Perspect. 2012.
[24] Smith KB, Larimer CW. The Public Policy Theory Primer. 3rd Editio. New York: Routledge; 2018. 288 pp. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494352.
[25] Anderson JE. Public Policymaking. 7th ed. Media; 2011.
[26] Burstein P. The Determinants of Public Policy: What Matters and How Much. Policy Stud J. 2020;48(1):87–110.
[27] Prindle DF. Importing concepts from biology into political science: the case of punctuated equilibrium. Policy Stud J. 2012;40(1):21–44.
[28] Baumgartner FR, Jones BD, Mortensen PB. Punctuated Equilibrium Theory: Explaining Stability and Change in Public Policymaking. In: Theories of the Policy Process. 2018. p. 55–101.
[29] McConnell A, t Hart P. Inaction and public policy: understanding why policymakers ‘do nothing.’. Policy Sci. 2019;52(4):645–61.
[30] Skok JE. Policy Issue Networks and the Public Policy Cycle: A Structural-Functional Framework for Public Administration. Public Adm Rev. 1995;55(4):325.
[31] Elander I, Gustavsson E. From policy community to issue networks: Implementing social sustainability in a Swedish urban development programme. Environ Plan C Polit Sp. 2019;37(6).
[32] Williamson K, Given LM, Scifleet P. Qualitative data analysis. Research Methods. 2nd ed. Information, Systems, and Contexts; 2017. pp. 453–76.
[33] Walliman N. Quantitative Data Analysis. In: Social Research Methods. 2014. p. 110– 28.
[34] McNabb DE. Research Methods in Public Administration and Nonprofit Management: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. 3AE Sharpe. 2013
[35] Cestari JM, Loures ED, Santos EA. A Method to Diagnose Public Administration Interoperability Capability Levels Based on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak. 2018;17(1):209–45.
[36] Odimegwu CO. Methodological Issues in the Use of Focus Group Discussion as a Data Collection Tool. J Soc Sci. 2000;4(2–3):207–12.
[37] Attewell P, Monaghan D. Data Mining for the Social Sciences. Oakland: University of California Press; 2015.
[38] Ignatow G, Mihalcea R. An Introduction to Text Mining: Research Design, Data Collection, and Analysis. An Introduction to Text Mining: Research Design. Data Collection, and Analysis; 2021.
[39] Miles MB, Michael Huberman A, Saldaña J. Qualitative data analysis: A methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed. SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2014. 408 pp.
[40] Bornstein MH. Secondary Data Analysis. In: The SAGE Encyclopedia of Lifespan Human Development. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506307633.n709.
[41] Radey M. Secondary Data Analysis Studies. In: The Handbook of Social Work Research Methods. 2019.
[42] Roberts A, Sabatier PA, Jenkins-Smith HC. Theories of Policy Process. New York: Routledge; 2018. 334 pp.
[43] Amri MM, Drummond D. Punctuating the equilibrium: an application of policy theory to COVID-19. Policy Pract. 2021;4(1).
[44] Baumgartner FR, Carammia M, Epp DA, Noble B, Rey B, Yildirim TM. Budgetary change in authoritarian and democratic regimes. J Eur Public Policy. 2017;24(6):792–808.
[45] Jolicoeur MM. An Introduction to Punctuated Equilibrium: A Model for Understanding Stability and Dramatic Change in Public Policies. Natl Collab Cent Heal Public Policy. 2018;( January).
[46] Cairney P. Punctuated Equilibrium. Understanding Public Policy. Theories and Issues. Palgrave Macmillan; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-35699-3_9.
[47] Givel M. The evolution of the theoretical foundations of punctuated equilibrium theory in public policy. Vol. 27. Rev Policy Res. 2010;27(2):187–98.