Download fulltext HTML
Lazaridou, D., & Michailidis, A. (2023). Assessment of Farmers’ Attitudes Toward Pest Control Services Provided by Birds. KnE Social Sciences, 8(1), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i1.12641

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i1.12641

statistics

  • 162 Abstract Views
  • 291 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • Dimitra Lazaridou

    Dimitra Lazaridou

    Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Laboratory of Agricultural Extension and Rural Sociology, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, University Campus, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
  • Anastasios Michailidis

    Anastasios Michailidis

    Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Laboratory of Agricultural Extension and Rural Sociology, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, University Campus, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece

Published Date

  • Feb 1, 2023

Assessment of Farmers' Attitudes Toward Pest Control Services Provided by Birds

KnE Social Sciences / Economies of the Balkan and Eastern European Countries (EBEEC) / Pages 138–147

Abstract

Sustainable, conservation-oriented agricultural practices like pest regulation by insectivorous birds can decrease agrochemical use and enhance efforts on maximizing biodiversity. Previous research has shown that attracting insect-eating bird species can improve pest control in fruit crops and have a positive impact on fruit yield. We conducted a survey among fruit farmers to analyze the determinants of the potential adoption of biological pest control (BPC) provided by insectivorous birds on their farms. Quantitative analysis showed that their willingness to implement the innovative practice, favoring farmland wildlife, is influenced by both economic and noneconomic factors. Farmers’ overall interest in attracting birds to their farms was related to a variety of factors, including their understanding of the beneficial role of insectivorous birds in biodiversity, their desire to reduce production costs, and their personal characteristics. These factors influencing farmers’ motivations for participation in biological pest control should be taken into account to clarify the barriers that prevent, and the incentives that might draw them into adoption of an eco-friendly approach for insect pest control.


Keywords: environmental benefits, innovative practice favoring farmland wildlife, farmers’ perceptions

References
[1] Morandin LA, Long RF, Kremen C. Pest control and pollination cost-benefit analysis of hedgerow restoration in a simplified agricultural landscape. Journal of Economic Entomology. 2016;109:1020–1027.

[2] Kross SM, Ingram KP, Long RF, Niles MT. Farmer perceptions and behaviors related to wildlife and on-farm conservation actions. Conservation Letters. 2018;11(1):1–9.

[3] De A, Bose R, Kumar A, Mozumdar S. Targeted delivery of pesticides using biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles. Berlin: Springer; 2014. Worldwide pesticide use, p. 5–6.

[4] Carvalho FP. Pesticides, environment and food safety. Food and Energy Security. 2017;6:48–60.

[5] Rani L, Thapa K, Kanojia N, Sharma N, Singh S, Grewal AS, et al. An extensive review on the consequences of chemical pesticides on human health and environment. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021;283:124657.

[6] Gruber A, Donaldson D, Kiely T, Wu L. Pesticides industry sales and usage 2006– 2007 market estimates. US. Washington DC: US Environmental Protection Agency; 2011.

[7] Mols CMM, Visser ME. Great tits (Parus major) reduce caterpillar damage in commercial apple orchards. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e202.

[8] Kellermann JL, Johnson MD, Stercho AM, Hackett SC. Ecological and economic services provided by birds on Jamaican Blue Mountain coffee farms. Conservation Biology. 2008;22:1177–1185.

[9] Karp DS, Mendenhall CD, Sandi RF, Chaumont N, Ehrlich PR, Hadly EA, et al. Forest bolsters bird abundance, pest control and coffee yield. Ecology Letters. 2013;16:1339–1347.

[10] Kross SM, Kelsey TR, McColl CJ, Townsend JM. Field-scale habitat complexity enhances avian conservation and avian-mediated pest-control services in an intensive agricultural crop. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2016;225:140– 149.

[11] Tela M, Cresswell W, Chapman H. Pest-removal services provided by birds on subsistence farms in south-eastern Nigeria. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0255638.

[12] Rey Benayas JM, Meltzer J, De Las Heras-Bravo D, Cayuela L. Potential of pest regulation by insectivorous birds in Mediterranean woody crops. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):1–19.

[13] Kotsonas E, Bakaloudis D, Papakosta M, Goutner V, Chatzinikos E, Vlachos C. Assessment of nestling diet and provisioning rate by two methods in the Lesser Kestrel (Falco naumanni). Acta Ornithologica. 2017;52(2):149–156.

[14] Kontsiotis V, Zaimes GN, Tsiftsis S, Kiourtziadis P, Bakaloudis D. Assessing the influence of riparian vegetation structure on bird communities in agricultural Mediterranean landscapes. Agroforestry Systems. 2019;93:675–687.

[15] Oh CO, Herrnstadt Z, Howard PH. Consumer willingness to pay for bird management practices in fruit crops. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems. 2015;39:782– 797.

[16] Herrnstadt ZP, Howard H, Oh CO, Lindell CA. Consumer preferences for ‘natural’ agricultural practices: Assessing methods to manage bird pests. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. 2016;31:516–523.

[17] Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 2000.

[18] Nunnally JC. An overview of psychological measurement. Clinical Diagnosis of Mental Disorders. 1978;97–146.

[19] Koutsou S, Partalidou M, Petrou M. Present or absent farm heads? A contemporary reading of family farming in Greece. Sociologia Ruralis. 2011;51(4):404–419.

[20] Tsiaousi A, Partalidou M. Female farmers in Greece: Looking beyond the statistics and into cultural–social characteristics. Outlook on Agriculture. 2021;50(1):55–63.

[21] Lazaridou D, Michailidis A, Mattas K. Evaluating the willingness to pay for using recycled water for irrigation. Sustainability. 2019;11(19):5220.

[22] Liontakis A, Sintori A, Tzouramani I. The role of the start-up aid for young farmers in the adoption of innovative agricultural activities: The case of aloe vera. Agriculture. 2021;11(349):1–24.

[23] Nyaupane NP, Gillespie JM. Louisiana crawfish farmer adoption of best management practices. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 2011;66(1):61–70.

[24] Lazaridou D, Michailidis A, Trigkas M. Socio-economic factors influencing farmers’ intention to undertake environmental responsibility. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2019;26(15):14732–14741.

[25] McGurk E, Hynes S, Thorne F. Participation in agri-environmental schemes: A contingent valuation study of farmers in Ireland. Journal of Environmental Management. 2020;262:110243.

[26] Gedikoglu H, McCann L, Artz G. Off-farm employment effects on adoption of nutrient management practices. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review. 2011;40(2):293–306.

[27] Unay-Gailhard I, Bojnec S. Farm size and participation in agri-environmental measures: farm-level evidence from Slovenia. Land Use Policy. 2015;46:273–282.

[28] Greiner R. Motivations and attitudes influence farmers’ willingness to participate in biodiversity conservation contracts. Agricultural Systems. 2015;137:154–165.

[29] Stallman HR, James HS, Jr. Determinants affecting farmers’ willingness to cooperate to control pests. Ecological Economics. 2015;117:182–192.

[30] Zhang L, Li X, Yu J, Yao X. Toward cleaner production: what drives farmers to adopt eco-friendly agricultural production? Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018;185:550– 558.

[31] Lazaridou D, Michailidis A. Valuing users’ willingness to pay for improved water quality in the context of the water framework directive. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. 2020;27(5):424–434.