Activities Based Contextual and Constructivist Learning: A Model for Enhancing Students' English Learning Outcomes
Changes from the current curriculum in Indonesia to the Merdeka Belajar (independent learning) curriculum require teachers to make learning more meaningful and fun for students by connecting concepts to the real world. This study aimed to develop a learning model with constructivism and contextual teaching and learning (CTL) approach to improve students’ English skills. The specific objectives of this study are to map the English learning model that has been implemented by teachers, identify the needs of students and teachers for the English learning model, develop a learning model with CTL and constructivism approaches, and test the feasibility of the model. The data were collected through observation, interviews, documentation, questionnaires, and tests in 12 public and private SMP/MTs spread across the Jepara, Demak, and Kudus districts. The collected data were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. Based on qualitatively collected data, students and teachers need a learning model that can provide students with learning experiences that are more meaningful. The developed model was proven effective by the value of the effectiveness test where the t-test results show greater than the t-table. Therefore, it implies that the learning models based on CTL and constructivism can be an alternative to the current learning models that can be applied to learning English at school.
Keywords: Meaningful activities; contextual learning; constructivism learning.
 Kemendikbud B. Pendidikan di Indonesia Belajar dari Hasil PISA 2018 [Internet]. Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Balitbang Kemendikbud. 2019. Available from: http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/id/eprint/16742
 Widana IW. Modul penyusunan soal higher order thinking skill (HOTS). Jakarta: Kemdikbud; 2017. 46 p.
 Huang YM, Chiu PS. The effectiveness of a meaningful learning-based evaluation model for context-aware mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2015;46:437–447.
 Wightman A. What is meaningful learning? Meaningful Learning. Canada; 2013.
 Richard JC. Communicative language teaching today. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006. 52 p.
 Smith SSE. (Re)Counting meaningful learning experiences: Using student-created reflective videos to make invisible learning visible during PjBL experiences. Interdiscip J Probl Learn. 2016;10:2–16.
 Hrin TN, Milenković DD, Segedinac MD. The effect of systemic synthesis questions [SSynQs] on students’ performance and meaningful learning in secondary organic chemistry teaching. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 2016;14:805–824.
 Sailin SN, Mahmor NA. Improving student teachers’ digital pedagogy through meaningful learning activities. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction. 2018;15:143–173.
 Díaz de León-López MG, Velázquez-Sánchez MDL, Sánchez-Madrid S, Olais-Govea JM. A simple approach to relating the optimal learning and the meaningful learning experience in students age 14–16. Information. 2021;12.
 Agra G, Formiga NS, Oliveira PS de, Costa MML, Fernandes M das GM, Nóbrega MML da. Analysis of the concept of meaningful learning in light of the Ausubel’s Theory. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2019;72:248–255.
 Mystakidis S, Berki E, Valtanen J. The Patras Blended Strategy Model for deep and meaningful learning in quality life-long distance education. Electron Journal of e-Learning. 2019;17:66–78.
 Khaefiatunnisa. The effectiveness of contextual teaching and learning in improving students’ reading skill in procedural text. Journal of English Education. 2015;3:80– 95.
 Mvududu NH, Thiel-Burgess J. Constructivism in practice: The case for english language learners. International Journal of Educational Development. 2012;4.
 Allard AC, Gallant A. Is this a meaningful learning experience? Interactive Critical Self-inquiry as Investigation. Studying Teacher Education. 2012;8:261–273.
 Baron P. A cybernetic approach to contextual teaching and learning. Constr Found. 2016;12:91–100.
 Darmuki A, Andayani, Nurkamto J, Kundharu S. The development and evaluation of speaking learning model by cooperative approach. International Journal of Instruction. 2017;11:2226–2227.
 Trianto. Model-model pembelajaran inovatif berorientasi konstruktivistik. Sunarni, editor. Jakarta: Prestasi Pelajar Publisher; 2008. p. 1–165.
 Tanaka M, Sanchez E. Students’ perceptions of reading through peer questioning in cooperative. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language. 2016;19:1–17.
 Slavin RE. Cooperative learning; Theory, research, and practice. 2nd ed. Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon; 1995. p. 1–189.
 Sutinen A. Constructivism and education: Education as an interpretative transformational process. Studies in Philosophy and Education. 2008;27:1–14.
 Drajati NA, Tan L, Haryati S, Rochsantiningsih D, Zainnuri H. Investigating English language teachers in developing TPACK and multimodal literacy. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 2018;7:575–582.
 Somyürek S. An effective educational tool: construction kits for fun and meaningful learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 2014;25:25–41.
 Fan KK, Xiao P wei, Su CH. The effects of learning styles and meaningful learning on the learning achievement of gamification health education curriculum. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 2015;11:1211–1229.