Transformation of the Transdisciplinary Vision in Education and Learning Practices in Islamic Higher Education
Abstract
The purpose of this article was to describe how IAIN Kendari has transformed a transdisciplinary vision into learning practices. There were three main topics discussed: 1) how to design a transdisciplinary curriculum; 2) how to assess lecturers’ readiness to implement learning using a transdisciplinary approach; and 3) how to prepare the learning environment. The three problems were explored at the Faculty of Tarbiyah and the IAIN Kendari Teacher Training Center with qualitative research using descriptive methods. The findings were as follows: the applied curriculum was an old one that was not designed in a transdisciplinary fashion. Bureaucratic issues contributed to the slow pace of curriculum changes. Second, lecturers’ teaching methods in general have not yet resulted in transdisciplinarity; the learning perspective is still sectoral. Third, a learning environment that promotes a transdisciplinary mindset has yet to emerge. The study program’s atmosphere, class management, student management, infrastructure and education personnel have not demonstrated readiness for a transdisciplinary vision in the realm of education and learning.
Keywords: transformation, transdisciplinary, learning practice, higher education
References
[1] S. Yuliawati, “Kajian implementasi tri dharma perguruan tinggi sebagai fenomena pendidikan tinggi di Indonesia,” Jurnal Ilmiah Widya, vol. 218712, 2012.
[2] R. Ibrahim, Kurikulum dan pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada, 2012.
[3] E. Elisa, “Pengertian, peranan, dan fungsi kurikulum,” Jurnal Curere, vol. 1, no. 2, 2018.
[4] M. A. Wahab, “Standarisasi kurikulum pendidikan bahasa Arab di perguruan tinggi keagamaan Islam negeri,” Arabiyat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab dan Kebahasaaraban, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 32–51, 2016.
[5] M. Amin, “Urgensi kompetensi guru sebagai pelaksana kurikulum di sekolah,” Al- Insyiroh: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 101–114, 2018.
[6] R. Maryana and Y. Rachmawati, Pengelolaan lingkungan belajar. Prenada Media, 2013.
[7] R. S. I. A. I. N. Kendari, 2019.
[8] P. R. Indonesia, Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia nomor 8 tahun 2012 tentang kerangka kualifikasi nasional Indonesia. Jakarta: Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi, 2012.
[9] J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications, 2016.
[10] L. J. Moleong, “Metodologi penelitian kualitatif.” 2019.
[11] M. B. Miles and A. M. Huberman, Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage, 1994.
[12] C. Winch, “Curriculum design and epistemic ascent,” Journal of Philosophy of Education, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 128–146, 2013.
[13] E. Sporer and A. Little, “Gemba Kaizen: A commonsense approach to a continuous improvement strategy.” 2012.
[14] R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton, “Balanced scorecard success: The Kaplan-Norton collection,” Harvard Business Review Press, 2015.
[15] R. McCormick and M. James, Curriculum evaluation in schools. Routledge, 2018.
[16] S. Kemmis and I. Robottom, “Principles of procedure in curriculum evaluation,” Journal of Curriculum Studies, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 151–55, 1981.
[17] H. Matlay, N. Othman, N. Hashim, and H. Wahid, “Readiness towards entrepreneurship education,” Education+ Training, 2012.
[18] R. B. A. Kadira, T. S. A. Saidb, and L. Thangaveluc, “IR 4.0 knowledge and readiness of lecturers at the Teachers Education Institute, Technical Education campus, Malaysia,” International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, vol. 11, pp. 1–29, 2020.
[19] S. P. Robbins, “Organizational behavior.” 2016.
[20] C. S. Lai, U. Chundra, and M. F. Lee, “Teaching and learning based on IR 4.0: Readiness of attitude among polytechnics lecturers,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1529, no. 3, 2020.
[21] A. Widyaningtyas, “Peran lingkungan belajar dan kesiapan belajar terhadap prestasi belajar fisika siswa kelas X Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri 1 Pati.” 2012.
[22] S. Samrin, O. M, L. Hadisi, and M. Z, “Effects of learning discipline, learning environment, and teacher teaching variations on student learning achievement,” International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 630– 642, 2020.
[23] B. A. Farmer, J. W. Slater, and K. S. Wright, “The role of communication in achieving shared vision under new organizational leadership,” Journal of Public Relations Research, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 219–235, 1998.
[24] P. M. Senge, Learning organizations. Cambridge: Gilmour Drummond Publishing, 1995.
[25] H. Warsito, “Hubungan antara self-efficacy dengan penyesuaian akademik dan prestasi akademik (Studi pada mahasiswa FIP Universitas Negeri Surabaya,” Pedagogi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 29–47, 2012.
[26] S. Syahrul, E. Karno, and Badarwan, “Social responsibility of university: Bridging moslim reality in strategic plan of IAIN Kendari, Southeast Celebes.” Indonesia, 2017.
[27] M. G. Chupp and M. L. Joseph, “Getting the most out of service learning: Maximizing student, university and community impact,” Journal of Community Practice, vol. 18, no. 2–3, pp. 190–212, 2010.
[28] M. J. Lage, G. J. Platt, and M. Treglia, “Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment,” The Journal of Economic Education, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 30–43, 2000.
[29] I. Harel and S. Papert, “Software design as a learning environment,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–32, 1990. [30] R. EM and S. JL, “The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China,” Computers & Education, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 838–852, 2008.