Examining Frequent Grammatical Errors in Student Theses: A Case Study of a Private University in Sulawesi
The purpose of this study was to determine the most common grammatical errors found in students’ theses at a private university in Southeast Sulawesi, and to consider the possible causes of the students’ mistakes. Descriptive qualitative methods were used. Students were recruited through purposive sampling. The theses were analyzed using the Mileys & Huberman’s approach. During the data collection process, the writer documented the thesis background and noted any errors that were discovered. 803 errors were found in the background of students’ theses. The most common errors were on misformation, which accounted for 547 or 68.12% of all errors, followed by omission errors, which accounted for 128 or 15.94% of all errors. Misordering and addition, on the other hand, accounted for 11.83% and 4.10% of all errors, respectively. The researchers deduced from the error analysis that mother tongue interference and target language causes contributed to these errors (false analogy, misanalysis, incomplete rule application, exploiting redundancy, overlooking co-occurrence restrictions, hypercorrection, overgeneralization, or system-simplification).
Keywords: frequent grammatical errors, misformation, misordering, addition, omission
 S. M. Gass and L. Selinker, Second language acquisition; An introductory course, 2nd ed. Lawrence: Erlbaum Associates Publisher, 2001.
 B. B. N. Mashoor and A. T. H. Abdullah, “Error analysis of spoken English language among Jordanian secondary school students,” International Journal of Education and Research, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 75–82, 2020.
 Zaid, “Factors affecting the morphological errors in young ESL learners’ writing,” International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 129–136, 2017.
 D. A. L. Vasquez, “Error analysis in written composition,” in PROFILE: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 2008.
 S. S. Mungungu, “Error analysis: Investigating the writing of ESL Namibian learners,” [Master’s thesis].
 P. Heydari and M. S. Bagheri, “Error analysis: Sources of L2 learners’ errors,” Theory and Practice in Language Studies, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 1583–1589, 2012.
 H. MS, “Analysis of syntactic errors in English writing: A case study of Jazan University preparatory year students,” Journal of Education and Practice, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 113– 120, 2018.
 H. Ngangbam, “An analysis of syntactic errors committed by students of English language class in the written composition of Mutah University: A case study,” European Journal of English Language, Linguistics, and Literature, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2016.
 S. K, “An analysis of errors in writing English sentences: A case study of Thai EFL students,” English Language Teaching, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 101–110, 2017.
 S. PPN, “Investigating junior high school students’ errors in using English past tense: A look from technological and sociological foundations,” English Teaching Learning and Research Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 245–258, 2020.
 Kaharuddin, “Detecting errors in English made by intermediate Indonesian learners of English in English department students of STAIN Parepare,” Kuriositas, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 1–19, 2013.
 Fajrita, “Investigating the error utterances produced by EFL Islamic boarding school students,” Perak, Malaysia.
 Wardah, An analysis of grammatical errors in students’ writing descriptive text at eight grade of state junior high school 16 Jambi. Universitas Islam Negeri Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Repository, 2018.
 M. A. Muhsin, “Analysing the students’ errors in using simple present (A case study at junior high school in Makassar,” Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 81–87, 2016.
 H. Y. Hartoto, The errors of English pronunciation among the second grade students of Tersono Junior High School Tersono Batang. Universitas Negeri Semarang Repository, 2010.