Download fulltext HTML
Tri Utami, S., & Yanti, Y. (2022). Speech Acts of Protest Expressed by Followers of the World Health Organization Instagram Account. KnE Social Sciences, 7(6), 196–206. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i6.10622

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i6.10622

statistics

  • 363 Abstract Views
  • 228 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • Sanita Tri Utami

    Sanita Tri Utami

    Universitas Bung Hatta, Padang, Indonesia
  • Yusrita Yanti

    Yusrita Yanti

    Universitas Bung Hatta, Padang, Indonesia

Published Date

  • Mar 22, 2022

Speech Acts of Protest Expressed by Followers of the World Health Organization Instagram Account

KnE Social Sciences / The Second Economics, Law, Education and Humanities International Conference (ELEHIC-2021) / Pages 196–206

Abstract




In response to the COVID-19 pandemic that has hit the world, the World Health Organization (WHO), as a frontline organization, provides education and information about COVID-19 regularly. The WHO uses Instagram as a social media platform to share information about COVID-19. This Instagram account garners many responses from its followers who express their comments in different ways. The pros and cons of COVID-19 policies have caused protests from people around the world. In this study, the researchers observed the speech acts of protest expressed by the followers of the WHO Instagram account. The data for this study were taken from the comments of WHO followers directed to two posts related to COVID-19 that received many responses. This was qualitative research and the theoretical concept used referred to the theory of speech acts, co-text, contexts, and function. The results showed that the function of the speech acts of protest was to express a sense of blaspheming, slandering, or judging. The results of this study are useful for scholars who observe speech acts, especially those that have functions to express emotions using various strategies.


Keywords: expressive speech act of protesting, function, context, WHO Instagram




References
[1] Yule G. Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.

[2] Austin J. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1962.

[3] Searle J. Speech act and essay in the philosophy of language. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 1969.

[4] Leech G. Semantics. Suffolk: PT Raja Grafindo Persada; 1974.

[5] Holmes J. An introduction to sociolinguistics. New York: Routledge; 2013.

[6] Siregar BU. The intricacies of language functions. Jakarta: Pusat Kajian Bahasa dan Budaya, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya; 2011.

[7] Cutting J. Pragmatic and discourse. Routledge: London; 2003.

[8] Bryman A. Social research method. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.

[9] Yanti Y. Words in various domains. Collection of distributed writings. Padang: LPPM Universitas Bung Hatta; 2020.

[10] Yanti Y. Efforts in language (Language, literature, culture & teaching studies). Festschrift for Prof. Dr. Mukhaiyar. Zaim, M., Hermawati., Jufrizal., Ardi, Havid., editors. Padang: Universitas Negeri Padang; 2020.

[11] Brown L. Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press; 1987.

[12] Yanti Y. Negative emotions in the speech act strategy of the 2016 US presidential debates. Paper presented at: International Conference on Creative Teaching, Assesment, And Research in the English Language; 2019 Jun 26-28; Melaka.