The Managerial and Supervisory Competency Levels of Public Elementary School Principals
The aim of this study was to assess the managerial and supervisory competency levels of public elementary school principals in Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Province. A questionnaire was used to collect data from 90 public elementary school principals. The data were analysed using a quantitatve approach. The results showed that the managerial competency level of these school principals was good. Continuing professional development (CPD) programs for principals are needed to further improve their competency levels. In addition, these CPD programs should focus on leadership rather than school management skills as the characteristics of the principal job have changed significantly.
Keywords: school principals, principal managerial competency, principal supervisory competency
 Petunjuk pelaksanaan: Pemerolehan sertifikat dan nomor unik kepala sekolah/ madrasah (NUKS/M). Kemendiknas; 2011.
 Ministry of Education and Culture. Overview of the education sector in Indonesia 2012. Achievement and challenges. Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture; 2013.
 Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional nomor 28, tahun 2010, tentang penugasan guru sebagai kepala sekolah/madrasah. Kemendiknas; 2010.
 Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan nomor 6, tahun 2018, tentang penugasan guru sebagai kepala sekolah/madrasah. Kemendikbud; 2018.
 Daryanto D. Administrasi pendidikan. Ineka Cipta; 2001.
 Sudrajat H. Manajemen peningkatan mutu berbasis sekolahi. Cipta Cekas Grafika; 2004.
 Wahjosumidjo W. Kepemimpinan kepala sekolah: Tinjauan teoritik dan permasalahannya. Raja Grafindo Persada; 2005.
 Leavitt, HJ. Top down: Why hierarchies are here to stay and how to manage them more effectively. Harvard Business School Publishing; 2005.
 Holofield M, Cline D. Clinical supervision and its outcome: Teacher and principals report. National Association of Secondary School Principals, NASSP Bulletin, Research Library; 2007.
 DuFour R, Barkey T. The principlal as staff developer. Journal of Development. 2005;16(4): 144-162
 Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional nomor 13, tahun 2007, tentang standar kepala sekolah/ madrasah. Kemendiknas; 2007.
 Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational & Psychological Measurement. 1970;30:607-610.
 Grissom JA, Egalite AJ, Lindsay CA. How principals affect studens and schools. A systematic synthesis of two decades of research. The Wallace Foundation; 2021. Available from: http://www.wallacefoundation. org/principalsynthesis
 Bush T. Leadership development and school improvement: Contemporary issues in leadership development. Educational Review. 2009;61(4):375-389.
 Bush T. International perspectives on leadership development: Making a difference. Professional Development in Education. 2012;38(4):663-678.
 Day DV. Leadership development: A review in context. Leadership Quarterly. 2001;11(4):581–613.
 Hallinger P. Reshaping the landscape of school leadership development: A global perspective. 1st edition. Hallinger P, editor. Taylor & Francis Group; 2003. School leadership preparation and development in global perspective: Future challenges and opportunities; p. 289-300.
 Davis HD, Hammond LD. Innovative principal preparation programs: What works and how we know. Planning and Chaning. 2012;43(1):25-45.
 Bush T. International perspectives on leadership development: Making a difference. Professional Development in Education. 2012;38(4):663-678. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2012.6607