KnE Medicine | The 6th Congress of the Asia Pacific Initiative on Reproduction (ASPIRE 2016) | pages: 202-206

, , , , and

1. Introduction

Infertility in Indonesia has an estimated prevalence as high as 22.3% [1]. Clinical struggles and technology improved outcomes in infertility patients, however since the nature of the problem and its treatment can be devastating it could be associated with psychological distress.

Previous psychosocial studies strongly demonstrate a high incidence of negative effects to infertility and its treatment which affect overall life satisfaction and well-being, success of treatment, willingness to continue with treatment, treatment evaluation and the long-term satisfaction people can hope to achieve if treatment is unsuccessful and they remain childless. Therefore the need to measure and take into account Quality of life (QoL) in infertility is crucial, and could lead to improved patient outcomes [2].

Recently, a condition specific QoL measurement tool, specifically designed for infertile couples, has been developed and used internationally. The Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) questionnaire. This tool has been demonstrated to have good psychometric properties, and its usefulness has been validated in a several study comparing the FertiQoL tool with generic QoL measurement instruments [3,4].

By far there has been no published study about quality of life in infertile couples in Indonesia, this preliminary study is to measure validity and reliability of Fertiqol in Indonesia infertility couples.

2. Material and Methods

This is a cross-sectional study, a written Fertiqol questionnaires were distribute to infertility clinics in Yasmin Clinic, Cipto Mangunkusumo hospital and Infertility private clinics. The Fertiqol tool is a self-report questionnaire. It is specifically designed for infertile patients to asses their QOL by experts from the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and the American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM).

Two main modules compose the FertiQoL tool: The Core FertiQoL module and the optional Treatment module. There are 24 items in the Core FertiQoL module and 10 items in the Treatment FertiQoL module. The 24 items from the Core FertiQoL are categorized into four domains, including the emotional, cognitive and physical (marked as mind/body), relational, and social domains. The emotional domain evaluates the impact of infertility on emotions, such as sadness, resentment, or grief. The mind/body domain refers to the influence of infertility on physical health, cognition, and behavior. The relational domain and the social domain are used to quantify the impact of infertility on partnership and on social aspects (e.g., social inclusion, expectation, and support), respectively. The optional treatment module consists of two domains that are used to assess the environment and tolerability for the treatment for infertility. Items from these domains are presented in the questionnaire randomly and rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The subscale and total FertiQoL scores are computed and transformed to achieve a range of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better QoL. The FertiQoL tool has been translated into 20 different languages, including Indonesia language, and is available on the FertiQoL website (http://www.fertiqol.org/). In our study, the Indonesian version of the FertiQoL questionnaire was used as the measurement instrument for QoL of Indonesia infertile couples.

The FertiQol questionnaire were given to women who were undergoing fertility management in Yasmin Clinic from September 2015 to January 2016, total of 129 FertiQol questionnaires were filled by participants voluntary and anonymously with surveyors were available during interviews for further explanation.

3. Data analysis

SPSS version 23.0 was used for statistical analysis. Validity of questionnaires was test by pearson correlation with two tailed score. The internal consistency of each subscale was calculated by using Cronbach's a coefficient, it was considered to be acceptable as good internal consistency occurs when Cronbach's a is 0.70 or greater.

4. Results

Demographic characteristic of the participants in this study including age, educational level, income, duration infertility, and area of living is shown in table 1. A total of 150 FertiQol questionnaires were collected, twenty-one invalid questionnaires with incomplete information were exclude, 129 copies of valid questionnaires were later analyzed.

Table 1

Characteristic of participants.


Number Percentage
Age (y)
<31 40 31
31-35 40 31
35-40 35 27.1
>40 14 10.9
Mean ± SD 33.87±5.189
Educational level
≤High school 23 17.8
Bachelor 76 58.9
≥master 30 23.3
Income (Rp)
<3 mil 19 14.7
3 mil-10 mil 70 54.3
10 mil-20 mil 21 16.3
>20 mil 12 9.3
Infertility (y)
min 1
max 29
Mean ± SD 5.39±4.172
Area of living
Jakarta 69 53.5
Around Jakarta 37 28.7
Java island 11 8.5
Outer island 12 9.3

The total and subscale scores are shown in table 2. The lowest subscale mean scores as emotional score (63.79±18.86) with average core and treatment score were 70.05 ± 13.36 and 70.94 ± 14.17, internal consistency were high in almost subscale questionnaires (> 0.70) except in relational domain, it had lowest score 0.663, deleting one item (Q6: “Are You satisfied with your sexual relationship even though You have fertility problems?) from the relational subscale would yield a Cronbach a of 0.693, which improved the reliability this subscale instrument.

Table 2

Fertiqol scores.


Mean SD Cronbach a
Emotional 63.79 18.86 0.774
Mind/body 66.05 18.22 0.790
Relational 75.19 15.11 0.663
Social 68.99 18.63 0.723
Environment 75.64 16.55 0.776
Tolerability 66.23 19.17 0.732
Core 70.05 13.36 0.894
Treatment 70.94 14.17 0.760
All questionnaires 70.49 11.44 0.898

We also made validity test for FertiQol with Pearson correlation (2-tailed) with r score among subscales and with total score were all > 0.1729, it shown that all questionnaires in Fertiqol Indonesian version were valid, data was shown in table 3.

Table 3

Validity test.


Pearson Correlation Emotional Mind/body Relational Social Environment Tolerability Total
emotional 1 0.780 0.325 0.706 0.235 0.375 0.847
Mind/body 0.780 1 0.318 0.680 0.186 0.429 0.834
Relational 0.325 0.318 1 0.414 0.228 0.183 0.560
Social 0.706 0.680 0.414 1 0.211 0.386 0.835
Environment 0.235 0.186 0.228 0.211 1 0.255 0.495
Tolerability 0.375 0.429 0.183 0.386 0.255 1 0.571
Total 0.847 0.834 0.560 0.835 0.495 0.571 1

5. Discussion

Several previous researches such as Aarts et al revealed that FertiQol is a more sensitive, reliable and valid measure of Qol in infertile women than general measures of QoL such as the WHO-BREF and SF-36 and it showed high reliability in the Dutch population, Pei-Yang Hsu et al, also found that FertiQol in general had good reliability score. To the best of our knowledge, however no previous study has evaluated validity and reliability of FertiQol questionnaires in infertile women in Indonesia [3].

Our study revealed similar results with good internal consistency was found in almost subscale, only in relational domain had slightly low internal consistency, this finding indicated that modification for relational domain is needed to gain better reliability. In table 2 we found that the lowest score was in emotional subdomain, this result was similar with the Dutch study, also with similar mean result in other subdomain and total score. Unfortunately until now there are no definite cut-off scores to determined who need extra counseling in subdomain [3,4].

There were few limitations of the study, we only included infertile women in this study, and the male side of the problem was not searched. Also we not compare Fertiqol with other QoL instrument therefor there are no definite cut-off scores.

In Conclusion, FertiQol Indonesian version was valid and reliable for measure QoL infertile women in Indonesia, the advantages of this questionnaires are it has several subdomain which could be used for tailored counseling if needed and could show that Infertility problem could reduce QoL someone.

References

1 

Rutstein Shea O., Iqbal H., Infecundity, Infertility, and Childlessness in Developing Countries, DHS Comparative Reports, Year: 2004, Volume: No. 9,

2 

Boivin J., Takefman J., Braverman A., The Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) tool: Development and general psychometric properties, Fertility and Sterility, Year: 2011, Volume: 96, Issue: 2, Page: 409-e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.046

3 

Aarts J. W. M., Van Empel I. W. H., Boivin J., Nelen W. L., Kremer J. A. M., Verhaak C. M., Relationship between quality of life and distress in infertility: A validation study of the Dutch FertiQoL, Human Reproduction, Year: 2011, Volume: 26, Issue: 5, Page: 1112-1118. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der051

4 

Hsu P.-Y., Lin M.-W., Hwang J.-L., Lee M.-S., Wu M.-H., The fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) questionnaire in Taiwanese infertilecouples, Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Year: 2013, Volume: 52, Issue: 2, Page: 204-209. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2013.04.009

FULL TEXT

Statistics

  • Downloads 13
  • Views 275

Navigation



ISSN: 2519-125X