Download fulltext HTML
Sari, R. N., iah L. Ayudiarti, D. L., & Gunawan, G. (2015). THE USE OF VACUUM IMPREGNATION TECHNOLOGY TO IMPROVE SMOKING PROCESS. KnE Life Sciences, 1, 45-52. https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v1i0.85

https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v1i0.85

statistics

  • 949 Abstract Views
  • 242 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • Rodiah Nurbaya Sari

    Rodiah Nurbaya Sari

    Center for Research and Development of Product Processing and Biotechnology of Marine and Fisheries
  • Diah L iah L. Ayudiarti

    Diah L iah L. Ayudiarti

    Center for Research and Development of Product Processing and Biotechnology of Marine and Fisheries
  • G Gunawan

    G Gunawan

    Indonesian Research Institute for Fisheries Post-harvest Mechanization

Published Date

  • Feb 1, 2015

THE USE OF VACUUM IMPREGNATION TECHNOLOGY TO IMPROVE SMOKING PROCESS

KnE Life Sciences / International Symposium on Aquatic Product Processing (ISAPPROSH) 2013 / Pages 45-52

Abstract

One of the new technologies contributing to preserve of the original properties of food (as fruit or vegetables or fish) is vacuum impregnation. Vacuum impregnation is one method to preserve foods using vacuum and pressure to fill the porous with osmotic solution. The application of vacuum impregnation had been conducted on smoked processing using liquid smoke for catfish fillet (Pangasius sp) and tilapia fillet (Oreochomis sp). Vacuum impregnation tool was used having 5 kg capacity of fillet product, vacuum pressure at 0.71 kg/cm2 and range of 0-6 kg/cm2 impregnation pressure. The research had done using osmotic solution with liquid smoke 1.5% and 17.4 g of salt/liter of water and the tool was set at condition of 0.71 kg/cm2 vacuum pressure and variations treatment such of vacuum process time (5 and 10 min), impregnation pressure (1 and 2 kg/cm2), and impregnation process time (5, 15, and 25 min). Each treatment was done in two replications. Analysis of these fillets before smoking process such of water content, protein content, fat content, color measurement, and hardness (cutting force). After smoking process these fillets are also analyzed for phenols content. Results showed that based on several parameters of the treatment, smoked fillet of catfish needed 35 minutes with phenol content 0.34 mg/kg and tilapia 25 minutes with 16.40 mg/kg phenol content. Thus by using vacuum impregnation tool could be shortening the smoking process for both of fillet.

Keywords: fillet, liquid smoke, original properties, vacuum impregnation 

References
Aminullah BAKM, Ratnayake WMN, Ackman RG. 1986. Effect of Smoking on The Proximate Composition of Atlantic Mackerel (Scomber scombrus). Journal of Food Science. 51(2): 327–329.

Anisah RN. 2007. Analisis Tingkat Keberdayaan Pengolah Ikan yang Berorientasi Pasar (Studi Empiris di Kota Tegal). Tesis. Program Pascasarjana. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.

Barat JM, Albros A, Chiralt A, Fito P. 1999. Equilibration of Apple Tissue in Osmotic Dehydration: Microstructural Changes. Drying Technology. 17 (7 & 8): 1375-1386.

[BSN] Badan Standarisasi Nasional. 2006. Test Methods of Chemistry - Part 2: The Determination of Water Content in Fishery Products. Jakarta: SNI 01-2354.2-2006.

[BSN] Badan Standarisasi Nasional. 2009. Ikan Asin Kering.-Bagian 1: Spesifikasi. Jakarta: SNI 2721.1: 2009.

[BSN] Badan Standarisasi Nasional. 2009. Ikan Asap-Bagian 1: Spesifikasi. Jakarta: SNI 2725.1:2009.

Bugueno G, Escriche I, Chiralt A, Perez-Juan M, Serra JA, Camacho MM. 2001. Use of Vacuum Impregnation in Smoked Salmon Manufacturing. Osmotic Dehydration & Vacuum Impregnation. Application in Food Industries. Chapter 17: 195-206. Basel: Technomic Publishing Co., Inc. Lancaster.

Bugueno G, Escriche I, Martinez-Navarrete N, Camacho MDM, Chiralt A. 2003. Influence of Storage Condition on some Physical and Chemical Properties of Smoked Salmon (Salmo salar) Processed by Vacuum Impregnation Techniques. Food Chemistry. 81: 85-90.

Bortolomeazzi R, Sebastianutto N, Toniolo R, Pizzariello A. 2007. Comparative Evaluation of the Antioxidant Capacity of Smoke Flavouring Phenol by Crocin Bleaching Inhibition, DPPH Radical Scavenging and Oxidation Potential. Food Chemistry Journal. 100 (4): 1481-1489.

Clifford MN. 1980. Smoking of Food. Process Biochemistry. 15: 8-11.

Cuppet SL, Gray JI, Booren AM, Price JF, Stachiw MA. 1989). Effect of Processing Variables on Lipid Stability in Smoked Great Lakes Whitefish. Journal of Food Science. 54(1): 52–54.

Darmadji P. 2006. Produksi Biopreservatif Asap Cair Cangkang Sawit dan Aplikasinya untuk Bidang Pangan, Hasil Perkebunan dan Kehutanan. Laporan Seminar Penggunaan Bahan Alami untuk Pengawetan Ikan. Jakarta: Balai Besar Riset dan Pengolahan Produk dan Bioteknologi Kelautan dan Perikanan dan ISPIKANI.

de Roos KB. 2003. Effect of Texture and Microstructure on Flavour Retention and Release. International Dairy Journal. 13 (8): 593-605.

Desrosier NW, Muljohardjo M. 1988. Teknologi Pengawetan Pangan, Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia. 624 pp.

Espe M, Nortvedt R, Lie Q, Hafsteinsson H. 2002. Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar, L.) as Raw Material for The Smoking Industry. II: Effect of Different Smoking Methods on Losses of Nutrients and on The Oxidation of Lipids. Food Chemistry. 77: 41–46.

Fito P. 1994. Modelling of Vacuum Osmotic Dehydration of Food. Journal of Food Enginering. 22: 313-328.

Fito P, Pastor R. 1994. On some non-Diffusional Mechanism occurring during Vacuum Osmotic Dehydration. Journal of Food Engineering. 21: 513-510.

Fito P, Chiralt A, Barat JM, Andres A, Monzo JM, Navarrete NM. 2001. Vacuum Impregnation for Development of New Dehydrated Products. Journal of Food Engineering. 49: 297-302.

Guillen MD, Cabo N. 2004. Study of The Effects of Smoke Flavourings on The Oxidative Stability of The Lipids of Pork Adipose Tissue by Means of Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. Spain: Meat Science.

Ilyas S. 1972. Pengantar Pengolahan Ikan. Jakarta: Lembaga Penelitian Teknologi Perikanan.

Jittinandana S, Kenney PB, Slider SD, Kiser RA. 2002. Effect of Brine Concentration and Brine Time on Quality of Smoked Rainbow Trout Fllets. Journal of Food Science. 67: 2095–2099.

Martinez O, Salmerón J, Guillén MD, Casas, C. 2011. Characteristic of Dry and Brine Salted Salmon later Treated with Liquid Smoke Flavourings. Agricultural and Food Science. 20: 217-227.

Rama F, Sari NI, Loekman S. 2013. Effect of Different Liquid Smoke Use Consumer Acceptance Catfish (Pangasius hypopthalmus) Smoke. http://repository.unri.ac.id/bitstream/123456789/1516/1/Fajri%20Rama%20-%200604113617.pdf. Diakses pada tanggal 19 September 2013.

[SMEWW] Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 2005. 21 th Edition: 5530.

Sumaryanto H, Santoso J, Muhandri, T. 2010. Pengembangan Teknologi Pengasapan Ikan yang Efisien Menggunakan Bahan Baku Lokal dan Berorientasi Pasar dengan UKM sebagai Sentra Pengembangan. Institut Pertanian Bogor Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat

Suñen E, Fernandez-Galian B, Aristimuño, C. 2001. Antibacterial Activity of Smoke Wood Condensates againts Aeromonas hydrophila, Yersinia enterocolitica and Listeria monocytogenes at Low Temperature. Food Microbiology. 18 (4): 387-393.

Swastawati F. 2011. Studi Kelayakan dan Efisiensi Usaha Pengasapan Ikan dengan Asap Cair Limbah Pertanian. Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.

Winarno FG. 1995. Enzim Pangan. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta. 115 hlm.