Effectiveness of Exercise App with Self-Efficacy to Achieve Recommended Levels of Physical Activity among Adult: A Systematic Review
Background: Inactive physical activity among university students remains publichealth concern due to signiﬁcant adverse effects and its high prevalence. Transmission from adolescence to adulthood considered as a critical period for lowered their physical activity. Evidences suggested that either self-efﬁcacy-driven intervention or applied exercise App could promote the level of physical activity. However, have examined the effect of exercise App with self-efﬁcacy intervention to promote recommended level of physical activity among university students
Objective: It was recognized the effects of exercise App with self-efﬁcacy to achieve recommended levels of physical activity among university students by systematic review.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted to search the English publications in the databases of PubMed, CochraneLibrary,MEDLINE,andCINAHL,inaperiodofduring2008to2018.Inclusive criteria were the publications using exercise App with self-efﬁcacy programs and the participants in the age from 18 to 64 years old and healthy people. Excluded criteria were if research recruited participants with chronic diseases, mental diseases, pregnant women, and disability in the study. Finally, 319 articles were searched. After two reviewers used CASP checklist to evaluate study quality, the ﬁndings were extracted from 4 qualiﬁed articles.
Results: The results of systematic review show that most of the studies were conducted in the USA and using Apps as strategies to design basing on SE to increase physical activity. Regarding as how using App for self-monitoring that combine with SE to design in the interventions, the strategies included merging in class sessions to implement the program, goal setting, advice and counseling from health care provider and telephone, problem solving training, using website, self-efﬁcacy coaching, and health provider visit plus telephone. All studies results show that a signiﬁcant effectiveness using Apps combine SE to applying in program could promote participants achieving recommended levels of PA.
Conclusions: This systematic review provides an evidence base if the program with exercise App and self-efﬁcacy to design it has higher effectiveness on achieving recommended levels of PA. SE is valuable to use in PA programs for adults in future studies.
 Keating, X. D., Guan, J., Piñero, J. C., & Bridges, D. M. (2005). A meta-analysis of college students’ physical activity behaviors. Journal of American college health, 54(2), 116-126.
 Budgen, C., Callaghan, D., Gamble, D., Wiebe, R., Reimer, C., Fedderson, M.,... Morrison, H. (2011). Creating a healthier campus community using action research and health promotion strategies: Students and organizational leaders as partners. University of British Columbia.
 Laska, M. N., Pelletier, J. E., Larson, N. I., & Story, M. (2012). Interventions for weight gain prevention duringthetransitiontoyoungadulthood:areviewoftheliterature.JournalofAdolescentHealth,50(4), 324-333.
 Deliens,T.,Deforche,B.,DeBourdeaudhuij,I.,&Clarys,P.(2015).Determinantsofphysicalactivityand sedentary behaviour in university students: a qualitative study using focus group discussions. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 1.
 Van der Ploeg, H. P., Chey, T., Korda, R. J., Banks, E., & Bauman, A. (2012). Sitting time and all-cause mortality risk in 222 497 Australian adults. Arch Intern Med, 172(6), 494-500.
 Inam, S., Saqib, A., & Alam, E. (2003). Prevalence of anxiety and depression among medical students of private university. JOURNAL-PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 53(2), 44-46.
 Kadison, R., & DiGeronimo, T. F. (2004). College of the overwhelmed: The campus mental health crisis and what to do about it: Jossey-Bass.
 Dallinga, J.M., Mennes, M., Alpay, L., Bijwaard, H., & de la Faille-Deutekom, M.B. (2015). App use, physical activity and healthy lifestyle: a cross sectional study. BMC Public health, 15:833.
 Lee,L.L.,Kuo,Y.C.,Fanaw,D.,Perng,S.J.,&Juang,I.F.(2012).Theeffectofaninterventioncombining self−efﬁcacy theory and pedometers on promoting physical activity among adolescents. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21(7−8), 914-922.
 Harries,T.,Eslambolchilar,P.,Rettie,R.,Stride,C.,Walton,S.,&vanWoerden,H.C.(2016).Effectiveness ofasmartphoneappinincreasingphysicalactivityamongstmaleadults:arandomisedcontrolledtrial. BMC public health, 16(1), 925.
 Bravata,D.M.,Smith-Spangler,C.,Sundaram,V.,Gienger,A.L.,Lin,N.,Lewis,R.,...&Sirard,J.R.(2007). Usingpedometerstoincreasephysicalactivityandimprovehealth:asystematicreview.Jama,298(19), 2296-2304.
 Biddle,S.J.,Hagger,M.S.,Chatzisarantis,N.L.,&Lippke,S.(2007).Theoreticalframeworksinexercise psychology. Handbook of Sport Psychology, Third Edition, 537-559.
 Vandelanotte, C., Spathonis, K. M., Eakin, E. G., & Owen, N. (2007). Website-delivered physical activity interventions: A review of the literature. Am J Prev Med, 33(1), 54-64.
 Webb, T., Joseph, J., Yardley, L., & Michie, S. (2010). Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efﬁcacy. Journal of medical Internet research, 12(1), e4.
 Glanz,K.,Rimer,B.K.,&Viswanath,K.(2008).Healthbehaviorandhealtheducation:theory,research, and practice: John Wiley & Sons.
 Bandura, A. (1997). Self Eﬂicacy. The Exercise of Control, New York: W H. Freeman & Co. Student Success, 333, 48461.