Changes to Species Diversity of Vegetation Communities during Restorative Successions in Different Types of Forests
Abstract
In this work, we study changes in species diversity of vegetation communities during restorative successions at logging sites in different types of forests, using the South Ural region as an example. Data from 180 geobotanical relevés of logging sites and secondary forests of different ages of the four main types of the South Ural region forest communities (cool-temperate dark-coniferous, nemoral broad-leaved, hemiboreal light-coniferous and boreal light-coniferous forests) were analyzed. Trends in changes to species diversity manifest themselves in different ways during each stage of the ‘native forest – logging – secondary forest’ succession sequence. In broad-leaved and cool-temperate dark-coniferous forests, changes in species diversity
follow the parabolic trajectory during restorative successions at clear-cutting sites; in other words, the diversity initially increases and then decreases during the progress of the succession. This is caused by the introduction of invasive synanthropic species during the early stages of the succession. The level of species diversity at clear-cutting sites in hemiboreal light-coniferous forests barely changes due to the rapid expansion of reed grass, which prevents the invasion of synanthropic species in the logging areas.
Keywords: species diversity, restorative succession, logging, secondary forests, synanthropic species
References
[1] Bråkenhielm, S. and Liu, Q. (1998). Long-term effects of clear-felling on vegetation dynamics and species diversity in a boreal pine forest. Biodiversity Conservation, no. 7, pp. 207–220.
[2] Vojta, J. (2007). Relative importance of historical and natural factors influencing vegetation of secondary forests in abandoned villages. Preslia, no. 79, pp. 223–244.
[3] Graae, B. J., Økland, R. H., Petersen, P. M., et al. (2004). Influence of historical, geographical and environmental variables on understorey composition and richness in Danish forests. Journal of Vegetation Science, no. 15, pp. 465–474.
[4] Korchagin, A. A. (1960). Determination of the age of trees of moderate latitudes. Polevaya Geobotanika, vol. 2, pp. 209–240.
[5] Hennekens, S. M. and Schamineé, J. H. J. (2001). TURBOVEG, a comprehensive data base management system for vegetation data. Journal of Vegetation Science, no. 12, pp. 589–591.
[6] Tichý, L., Holt, J., and Nejezchlebová, M. (2011). JUICE. Program for Management, Analysis and Classification of Ecological Data, 2nd Edition. Brno: Vegetation Science Group, Masaryk University.
[7] Kopečky, K. and Hejny, S. (1974). A new approach to the classification of anthropogenic plant communities. Vegetation, no. 29, pp. 17–20.
[8] Westhoff, V. and van der Maarel, E. (1978). The Braun-Blanquet approach, in Classification of plant communities, pp. 287–399. Dordrecht: Springer.
[9] Foster, B. L. and Tilman, D. (2000). Dynamic and static views of succession: Testing the descriptive power of the chronosequence approach. Plant Ecology, vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 1–10.
[10] Martynenko, V. B., Mirkin, B. M., and Muldashev, A. A. (2008). Syntaxonomy of the Southern Urals forests as a basis for the system of their protection. Russian Journal of Ecology, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 459–465.
[11] Mirkin, B. M., Shirokikh, P. S., Martynenko, V. B., et al. (2010). Analysis of trends in the formation of species richness of plant communities using syntaxonomy and ecological scales. Russian Journal of Ecology, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 249–253.
[12] Kryshen, A. M. (2006). Plant Communities of Karelian Felling. Moscow: Nauka.
[13] Ulanova, N. G., Belova, I. N., and Logofet, D. O. (2008). On the competition among discrete-structured populations: A matrix model for population dynamics of woodreed and birch growing together. Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 478–494.
[14] Shirokikh, P. S., Martynenko, V. B., and Kunafin, A. M. (2013). Experience in syntaxonomic and ordination analysis of progressive succession in cutover areas of boreal light conifer forests in the Southern Urals. Russian Journal of Ecology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 185–192.
[15] Ivanova, N. S. (2007). Dynamics of productivity of herb-subshrub layer in the forests of the western foothills of the South Urals. Botanicheskii Zhurnal, vol. 92, no. 9, pp. 1427–1442.
[16] Martynenko, V. B., Shirokikh, P. S., Mirkin, B. M., et al. (2014). Syntaxonomic analysis of restorative successions after cutting down light coniferous forests of the South Ural Region. Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii, vol. 75, no. 6, pp. 478–490.