Evaluation of Control Method Failures for Exposure to Sandblasting Silica Dust in a Steel Construction Company, Indonesia
Abstract
Silica is one of the materials most commonly used for sandblasting in steel construction. Occupational diseases caused by exposure to silica dust occur in several countries, both developed and developing. In order to prevent the occurrence of such diseases, some developed countries have regulated methods to control exposure to silica dust, but in developing countries like Indonesia, methods of controlling exposure to silica dust are not regulated and upper respiratory infection among sandblasting workers still happens. This study aimed to evaluate the failure of implementing methods of controlling exposure to silica dust during sandblasting
in a steel construction company in Indonesia. Aspects that were evaluated included control efforts such as the control equipment, ventilation systems, standard operating procedures (SOPs), and the concentration of silica dust in the workplace. The evaluation was conducted by comparing the expected targets of the control efforts
with the concentration of silica dust in the workplace. Evaluation results showed that the control methods are sufficient when viewed from the performance of the equipment used. However, in general, the control measures were not effective because high concentrations of silica dust were found in the workplace because the implementation of the SOPs was not optimal, and the disparity or variation in the workers understanding of the application of the SOPs. Therefore, the understanding of the procedures and supervision of sandblasting should be increased.
Keywords: sandblasting, silica dust, control method, evaluation of failure
References
[1] American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), 2016. TLVs & BEIs Based on the Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. (Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH).
[2] Batam Government, 2011. Circular of BatamMayor: Prohibition of Silica Sand as Sandblasting Agent, retrieved from http://skpd.batamkota.go.id/dampaklingkungan/2011/11/ larangan-penggunaan-pasir-silica-sebagai-material-sandblasting/
[3] Center for Disease Control (CDC), 1987. NIOSH Guide to Industrial Respiratory Protection. Cincinnati, Ohio:NIOSH Publication no 87-116.
[4] Center for Disease Control (CDC), 2003. NIOSH Manual Analytical Method SILICA, CRYSTALLINE, by XRD: METHOD 7500. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ docs/2003-154/pdfs/7500.pdf
[5] Center for Disease Control (CDC), 1976. Abrasive Blasting Operations: Engineering Control and Work Practices Manual (Cincinnati, OH: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSH Publication No. 76-179). Ohio: Cincinnati.
[6] Chia, S. 1991. ”Silicosis and lung cancer among Chinese granite workers.” Scand J Work Environ Health,117:170-4.
[7] Derelanko, M. J. 2002. Risk Assessment. In Handbook of Toxicology, edited by M. J Derelanko, and M. A. Hollinger, 1000–1199. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
[8] Indonesian Ministry of Manpower, 2011. Threshold Limit Value for Physical and Chemical Factor. Indonesia. Jakarta : PERMENAKER NO 13, 2011.
[9] International Agency for Research on Cancer [IARC], (1997). IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Silica, Some Silicates, Coal Dust and Para-aramid Fibrils., Vol. 68. (Lyon, France: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer).
[10] Jindal, S. 2013. ”Silicosis in India: past and present.”CurrOpinPulm Med, 119:163–168.
[11] Kouimtzis, T. 2002. ”Particulate Emission Control.” In Airborne Particulate Matter,editedby T. Kouimtzis, and C. Samara, 279–330. Berlin Heidelberg: SpringerVerlag Berlin Heidelberg.
[12] McDermott, H. J. 2002. ”Local Exhaust Ventilation.” In Handbook of Toxicology, edited by B. A Plog, and P. J. Quinland, 607–630. Boca Raton: NSC Press.
[13] National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health(NIOSH), 1991. Work-related lung disease surveillance report. (Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, Publication No. 91–113, Table 23, p. 38.
[14] Newton, P.E. 2002. Fundamental Inhalation Toxicology. In Handbook of Toxicology, edited by M. J Derelanko, and M. A. Hollinger, 283– 346. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
[15] Occupational Safety and Health Administration(OSHA), 1997. Additional Enforcement Policy Change for Respiratory Protection Required for Abrasive Blasting Under the Interim Final Rule for Lead in Construction, 29 CFR1926.62. Retrieved from https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_ table=INTERPRETATIONS&p_id=22376
[16] Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), 2011. Directive #: CPL 03- 00-007 National Emphasis Program – Crystalline Silica. Retrieved from https://www. osha.gov/OshDoc/Directive_pdf/CPL_03-00-007.pdf
[17] Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), 2011. FR #: 81:60272- 60274 Occupational Exposure to Respirable Crystalline Silica; Correction. FR #: 81:60272-60274. Retrieved from https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp. show_document?p_table=FEDERAL_REGISTER&p_id=27464
[18] Wabeke, R.L. 2013. Air contaminants, ventilation, and industrial hygiene economics: the practitioner’s toolbox and desktop handbook. FL, USA: Taylor & Francis.
[19] Yassin, A. 2005. ”Occupational Exposure to Crystalline Silica Dust in the United States, 1988–2003.” Environmental Health Perspectives113:3: 255–260.