Scaling Up Chlorhexidine for Umbilical Cord Care in Hard-To-Reach-Areas, Far-Western, Nepal
Abstract
Neonatal Health is a grave concern for Nepal presently. Still home delivery does exist in our country where sixty three per cent of deliveries happens at home in an unhygienic environment and 41% of them apply a substance such as oil, dried cow dung, ash, vermillion to the umbilical cord for early fall of stump which can lead to infection (NDHS 2011). Meanwhile, the Government of Nepal (GoN) has made great strides in reducing NMR. In 2011 GoN pioneered an exciting and promising intervention with Chlorhexidine (CHX) which is affordable, efficacious and safe. This intervention saved four thousand babies’ lives. The main objective of the research
was to identify an appropriate behavioral communication strategy to reach the hardto-reach-areas for the practice of healthy cord care. The BCC intervention used were three standard approaches. The first one were social mobilization approach (training to FCHV, mother’s groups and community leaders, demonstrations with life-sized dolls, distribution of posters, pamphlets and providing essential CHX related audio and
video messages) to primary and secondary audiences. Another approach used were advocacy which included initial observation and keeping records of availability of CHX tubes in health facilities and counseling to ANC service providers, health facilities in charge and FCHV and the last approach used were multimedia which constituted of ICT and IEC materials for the purpose of intervention to change the participant’s behaviour.
Keywords: behavioral communication change, social mobilization, advocacy, multimedia use
References
[1] Costello A, Manandhar D. 2000. Current state of the health of newborn infants in developing countries. In: Costello A, Manandhar D, editors. Improving Newborn Infant Health in Developing Countries. Imperial College Press; London, England, pp. 1–14.
[2] Darmstadt GL, Bhutta ZA, Cousens S, Adam T, Walker N, de Bernis L. 2005. “Evidence-Based, Cost- Effective Interventions: How Many Newborn Babies Can We Save?.” Lancet 365:977–988.
[3] Goldenberg RL, McClure EM, Saleem S, Rouse D, Vermund S. 2006. “The Use of Vaginally Administered Chlorhexidine During Labor to Improve Pregnancy Outcomes – A Systematic Review.” Obstet Gynecol 107(5):1139–1146.
[4] Lawn JE, Cousens S, Darmstadt GL, Paul V, Martines J. 2004. “Why are 4 Million Newborn Babies Dying Every Year?.” Lancet 364:2020.
[5] Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J. 2005. “4 Million Neonatal Deaths: When? Where? Why?.” Lancet 365:891– 900.
[6] McClure EM, Goldenberg RL, Brandes N, Darmstadt GL, Wright LL. for the CHX Working Group. 2007. “The Use of Chlorhexidine to Reduce Maternal And Neonatal Mortality and Morbidity in Low- Resource Settings.” Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 97(2):89– 94.
[7] Mullany LC, Darmstadt GL, Khatry SK, Katz J, LeClerq SC, Shrestha S, Adhikari R, Tielsch JM. 2006. “Topical Applications of Chlorhexidine to The Umbilical Cord For Prevention of Omphalitis and Neonatal Mortality in Southern Nepal: A CommunityBased, Cluster-Randomised Trial.” Lancet 367(9514):910–
[8] Rahmathullah L, Tielsch JM, Thulasiraj RD, et al. 2003. “Impact of New Born Vitamin A Dosing on early Infant Mortality: A Community – based Randomized Trial in South India.” Br Med J 327:254
[9] Save the Children Federation.2001. Saving Newborn Lives, State of the World’s Newborns. Save the Children Federation: Westport CT, pp. 1–49.
[10] Soofi S, CousensS, Imdad A, Bhutto N, Ali N, Bhutta ZA. 2012. “Topical Application of Chlorhexidine to Neonatal Umbilical Cords for Prevention of Omphalitis and Neonatal Mortality in a Rural District of Pakistan: A Community-based, Clusterrandomised Trial.” Lancet 379(9820):1029-36