Test Various Estrus Detection Device Against Pregnancy Rates on Dairy Cows in Cooperative Tunas Setia Baru Kabupaten Pasuruan

Abstract

This research aims to determine the use of various estrus detection devices before artificial insemination as measured by pregnancy rate. The researcher used a sample of 60 cows were used in this research which is divided into four groups as a control and treatment groups (Thermopin®, Hauptner and Draminski groups), and each cow was detected for the sign of estrus by three devices that were Thermopin®, Hauptner and Draminski prion when doing an artificial insemination. The cows were observed to 45 days after artificial insemination for observing pregnancy. This research method is the exploration scope to prove the effect of various estrus detection tool against pregnancy rates. The result of ANOVA test, there is the effect of using a various estrus detection devices against pregnancy rates. Samples tested by Draminski with average (1.53±0.51) resulted in a 53.3% pregnancy rate, the samples were tested with Hauptner with average (1.67±0,48) resulted in pregnancy rate 66.7%. Without treatment or control, sample with an average of (1.67±0.48) resulted in a  73.3% pregnancy rate. While samples were tested with Thermopin® with average (2.00±0.00) resulted in a 100% pregnancy rate. In conclusion, Thermopin® the best detection tool than other estrus detection devices.

 

Keyword: estrus detection, artificial insemination, dairy cow, pregnancy rate

References
[1] Gofur, A. 2013. Analisis Potensi Permintaan, Penawaran Susu Segar Dan Kelayakan Investasi Untuk Klaster Peternakan Sapi Perah Sebagai Strategi Pengembangan Kawasan Sapi Perah Di Kabupaten Jembe [Skripsi]. Fakultas Ekonomi. Universitas Jember.
[2] Hardijanto T, T.Sardjito, T. Hernawati , S. Susilowati dan T.W.Suprayogi. 2010. Buku Ajar Inseminasi Buatan. Airlangga University Press. Surabaya.
[3] Hafez, E.S.E., 2000. Reproduction in Farm Animal. 7th ed. Lippicott Williams & Wilkin. Philadelphia. USA. Page:347-441.
[4] Chanvallon, A. S.C. Castel, J. Gatien, J.M. Lamy, D. Ribaud, C. Allain, P. Clement, P. Salvetti. 2014. Comparison of Three Device for The Automated Detection of Estrus in Dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 82: 734-741
[5] Sofia, A. 2016. Pengaruh Temperatur Rektum dan Temperatur Vagina saat Inseminasi Buatan terhadap Angka Kebuntingan pada Sapi Perah di Dataran Tinggi dan Dataran Rendah [Skripsi]. Fakultas Kedokteran Hewan. Universitas Airlangga.
[6] Balai Inseminasi Buatan (BIB). 2011. Buku Pintar Inseminasi Buatan. Balai Inseminasi Buatan, Lembang.Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan. Kementrian Pertanian.
[7] Diwiyanto, K. 2012. Optimalisasi Teknologi Inseminasi Buatan Untuk Mendukung Usaha Agribisnis Sapi Perah dan Sapi Potong. Bunga Rampai. Puslitbangnak.
[8] Caraviello, D. Z., K. A. Weigel, P. M. Fricke, M. C. Wiltbank, M. J. Florent, N.B. Cook, K.V. Nordlund, N.R. Zwald and C.L Rawson. 2006. Survey of Management Practies on Reproductive Performance of Dairy Cattle on Large us Commersial Farms. Departement of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706. School of Veterinary Medicine, Univesity of Wisconsin, Madinson 537. Jurnal of Dairy Science. 89(12): 4723 – 4735.
[9] Abidin, Z., Y.S. Ondho dan B. Sutiyono. 2012. Penampilan Berahi Sapi Jawa Berdasarkan Poel 1, Poel 2, dan Poel 3. Fakultas Peternakan dan Pertanian Universitas Diponegoro.
[10] Salem, M.B., Djeamali M, Koyouli C, Majdoub A. 2006. A Review Of Environmental And Management Factors Affecting The Reproductive Performance Of Holstein-Friesian Dairy Herds In Tunisia. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 18 (4).
[11] Hariadi, M, S. Hardjopranyoto, Wurlina, H.A Hermadi, B. Utomo, Rimayanti, I.N. Triana, H. Ratnani. 2011. Buku Ajar Ilmu Kemanjiran pada Ternak. Surabaya : Airlangga University Press.
[12] Roriea, R.W, T.R. Bilby, T.P. Lexter. 2002. Application of Electronic Estrus Detection Technologies to Reproductive Management of Cattle. Theriologieslogy 57: 137-148