Download fulltext HTML
Widnyana, I. K., Ariati, P. E. P., & Suanda, I. W. (2022). The Effect of Seed Soaking with Suspensions of Pseudomonas Alcaligenes and Bacillus on the Growth and Yield of Bitter Melon (Momordica Charantia L.) in a Greenhouse. KnE Life Sciences, 7(3), 593–606. https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v7i3.11164

https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v7i3.11164

statistics

  • 343 Abstract Views
  • 280 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • I Ketut Widnyana

    I Ketut Widnyana

    Department of Agrotechnology, University of Mahasaraswati Denpasar, Indonesia
  • Putu Eka Pasmidi Ariati

    Putu Eka Pasmidi Ariati

    Department of Agrotechnology, University of Mahasaraswati Denpasar, Indonesia
  • I Wayan Suanda

    I Wayan Suanda

    Department of Biology Education, University of PGRI Mahadewa, Indonesia

Published Date

  • Jun 7, 2022

The Effect of Seed Soaking with Suspensions of Pseudomonas Alcaligenes and Bacillus on the Growth and Yield of Bitter Melon (Momordica Charantia L.) in a Greenhouse

KnE Life Sciences / The First Asian PGPR Indonesian Chapter International e-Conference 2021 / Pages 593–606

Abstract

The aim of this research was to determine the impact of soaking bitter melon seeds in a Pseudomonas alcaligenes and Bacillus sp bacteria suspension on the growth and yield of bitter melon. A randomized block design was used with 11 treatments consisting of three isolates of P. alcaligenes, four isolates of Bacillus sp, one mixed suspension of P. alcaligenes, one mixed suspension of Bacillus sp, one mixed suspension of P. alcaligenes with Bacillus sp, and one control, each of which was repeated four times for a total of 44 experimental pots. Data were analyzed using a variance test with one-way ANOVA. The results showed that the highest number of fruits was obtained from the Bacillus sp2 treatment (4.25 units), followed by the mixed Bacillus sp, Bacillus sp3, and P. alcaligenes TmA1 (4.00 units), while the control only yielded 3.25 units. The highest fresh weight per fruit was obtained from the P. alcaligenes TrN2 treatment (89.25 g), followed by Bacillus sp2 (87.2 g), and mixed Bacillus sp (80.66 g), which was an increase of 34.57%, 31.48%, and 21.62% over the control, respectively.


Keywords: seed soaking; bitter melon; suspension of Bacillus sp.; P. alcaligenes

References
[1] Jumakir M. 2012. Cultivation Technology of Paria in Pot. Publisher: Center for the Assessment of Agricultural Technology (BPTP). Jambi.

[2] Muneer A, Mulugeta K. Mechanism and applications of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Journal of King Saud University - Science. 2014;26(1):1-20.

[3] Biswas JC, Ladha JK, Dazzon FB. Rhizobia inoculation improves nutrient uptake and growth of lowland rice. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 2000;64(5):1644- 1650.

[4] Widnyana IK, Javandira C. Activities Pseudomonas spp. and Bacillus sp. to stimulate germination and seedling growth of tomato plants. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia. 2016;9:419-423.

[5] Widnyana IK, Ngga M, Sapanca PLY. The effect of seed soaking with rhizobacteria Pseudomonas alcaligenes on the growth of swamp cabbage (Ipomoea reptans Poir). The 2nd International Joint Conference on Science and Technology (IJCST) 2017. IOP Publishing. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2017;953(2018): 7

[6] Taufik M. Growth and production of chili plants applied to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Journal. Agrovigor: Jurnal Agroekoteknologi. 2010;10(1):99-107.

[7] Rosenblueth M, Martínez-Romero o E. Bacterial endophytes and their interactions with hosts. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions . 2006;19(8):827–837.

[8] Maunuksela L. Molecular and physiological characterization of rhizosphere bacteria and frankia in forest soils devoid of actinorhizal plants [dissertation]. Amsterdam (NED): Biocentri Wikki Universitatis Helsingiensis; 2004.

[9] Widnyana IK, Sukerta IM, Wiswasta IGNA, Limantara LM. The role of rizobacteria Pseudomonas alcaligenes, Bacillus sp. and mycorrhizal fungi in growth and yield of tomato plants. International Journal of Geomate. 2019;17(61):174-180.

[10] Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd ed. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press; 1995.

[11] Gusti IN, Khalimi, Dewa K, Ketut IN, Dani S. Application of rhizobacteria Pantoea agglomerans to increase growth and yield of corn crops. (Zea mays. L) Hybrid variety BISI-2. Agrotrop. 2012;2(1):1-9.

[12] Figueiredo, M. D. V. B., Seldin, L., Araujo, F. F. D., & Mariano, R. D. L. R. (2010). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: fundamentals and applications. In Plant growth and health promoting bacteria (pp. 21-43). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

[13] Tenuta, M. (2004). Plant PGPR. Prospects for Increasing Nutrient Acquisition and Disease Control. Department of Soil Science. University of Manitoba.

[14] McMilan S. Promoting growth with PGPR.2007. The Canadian organic grower. Soil Foodweb Canada Ltd. Soil Biology Lab. & Learning Centre.

[15] Widnyana IK, Suprapta DN, Sudana IM, Temaja IG. Pseudomonas alcaligenes, potential antagonist against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersicum is the cause of Fusarium wilt disease on tomato. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare. 2013;3(7):163-169.

[16] Widnyana IK. Antagonistic activity and abilities of Pseudomonas spp. forming siderophore to suppress Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici on tomato plants. Proceedings of the National Seminar of Biology Study Program, Faculty of Math and Science. 2014;1(1)145-150

[17] Rahni NM. Effects of PGPR phytohormones on the growth of corn (Zea mays) plants. An Agribusiness and Regional Development. 2012;3(2):27-35.

[18] Egamberdiyeva D. The effect of PGPR on growth and nutrient uptake of maize in two different soils. Applied Soil Ecology. 2007;36(1):184-189.

[19] Bolero L, Perrig D, Masciarelli O, Penna C, Cassan F, Luna V. Phytohormone production by three strains of Bradyrhizobium japonicum and possible physiological and technological implications. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology . 2007;74(8):874-880

[20] Weller DM, Cook RJ. Increased growth of wheat by seed treatments with alcaligenes pseudomonads, and implications of phytium control. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology.. 1986;8:328-334.

[21] Van Peer R, Schippers B. Plant growth responses to bacterization with selected Pseudomonas spp. strains and rhizosphere microbial development in hydroponic cultures. The Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 1988;35:456–463.

[22] Weller DM. Biological control of soilborne plant pathogens in the rhizosphere with bacteria. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 1988;26:379-407.

[23] Widnyana IK, Ngga M, Sapanca PLY. The effect of seed soaking with rhizobacteria Pseudomonas alcaligenes on the growth of swamp cabbage (Ipomoea reptans poir). Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2018;953(1):7

[24] Maurhofer M, Hase C, Meuwly P, Metraux JP, Defago G. Induction of systemic resistance of tobacco to tobacco necrosis virus by the root-colonizing Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHA0: influence of the gacA gene and of pyoverdine production. Phytopathology. 1994;84:139-146.

[25] Widnyana IK, Sumantra IK, Pandawani NP, Ariati PE. Induction of total phenol and salicylic acid with Pseudomonas spp. suspension as indications increasing systemic resistance on the vanilla plant. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 2019;25(3):480–485.

[26] Bakker PA, Pieterse CMJ, van Loon LC. Induced systemic resistance by fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. Phytopathology. 2007;97:239-243.

[27] Ganesan, P., & Gnanamanickam, S. S. Biological control of Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. in peanut 7by inoculation with Pseudomonas fluorescens. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 1987. 19(1), 35-38.

[28] Benhamou N, Belanger RR, Paulitz TC. Induction of differential host responses by Pseudomonas fluorescens in Ri T-DNA-transformed pea roots after challenge with Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. pisi and Pythium ultimum. Phytopathology. 1996;86:1174- 1185.

[29] Wei G, Kloepper JW, Tuzun S. Induction of systemic resistance of cucumber to Colletotrichum orbiculare by select strains of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Phytopathology. 1991;81:1508-1512.

[30] Widnyana IK, Wiswasta IGN, Yuesti A. Tomato plant protection management to reduce Fusarium wilt disease by utilizing plant growth promoting rhizobacteria Pseudomonas alcaligenes. Scientific Research Journal (SCIRJ). 2017;5(12):84-89.

[31] Soenartiningsih Mrs, Pabbage MS, Djaenuddin N. Use of antagonist inoculum (Trichoderma and Gliocladium) in suppressing midrib rot disease in maize. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 2011 Cereal National Seminar on October 3 - 4,2011.

[32] Suriani Mrs, Muis A. The prospect of Bacillus subtilis as a biological control agent of soilborne pathogens on maize. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian. 2016;35(1):37-45.

[33] Wulansari NK, Prihatiningsih N, Djatmiko HA. The effectiveness of five isolates of Bacillus subtilis as PGPR in increasing the growth of red chili plants. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the National Seminar ”Development of Sustainable Rural Resources and Local Wisdom VII”; 2017 Nov 17-18; Purwokerto, Indonesia.

[34] Diarta IM, Javandira C, Widnyana IK. Antagonistic bacteria Pseudomonas spp. dan Bacillus spp. against Fusarium oxysporum fungus causes plant wilt disease. Jurnal Bakti Saraswati. 2016;5(1):70-76.

[35] Pandango S, Widnyana IK, Sapanca PLY. The effect of soaking seeds with Bacillus spp bacteria on the growth and yield of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Agrimeta. 2018;08(16):50-55.