KnE Energy | The 3rd International Conference on Particle Physics and Astrophysics (ICPPA) | pages: 297–303


1. Introduction

In the past decade, a tremendous experimental efforts have been carried out in order to study the partonic structure of proton. In spite of the remarkable phenomenological success of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) in deep-inelastic-scattering (DIS) experiments, a detailed understanding of the partonic structure of bound nuclei is still lacking. In the collinear factorized approach to perturbative QCD (pQCD), the structure and dynamics of nucleus are described by the nuclear parton distribution functions (nuclear PDFs) [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Analogously to the DIS data available for the free proton case, fixed-target +A DIS scattering has a huge potential to offer information on the nuclear PDFs. In this work, we have reviewed the results of our recent KA15 NNLO nuclear PDFs and their uncertainties. After first introducing to the nuclear DIS data sets, the analysis method are quickly recalled. Then the results of our NNLO nuclear PDFs discussed, and detailed comparison with nuclear DIS experimental data are presented.

2. Nuclear DIS data sets

In our analysis, we have used a large variety of ±-A DIS and pA Drell-Yan (DY) data sets. The data sets used in the KA15 analysis, listed in Ref. [1]. The neutral current charged-lepton ( ± + nucleus) DIS data as well as DY cross-section ratios σ DY A/σ DY A' used in the KA15 analysis are shown in Figure. figxQdata. This plot nicely summarizes the universal x and Q2 dependence of the nuclear DIS data. However, the kinematic reach of currently available cross section measurements in +A DIS is much more restricted than in the case of +p DIS. As a consequence, the nuclear PDFs are significantly less constrained than the proton PDFs. As one can see from Fig. figxQdata, at small value of x<0.01 , the obtainable constraints are limited by low statistics.

Figure 1

(Color online) Nominal coverage of the data sets used in KA15 global fits. The plot nicely summarizes the universal Q2 and x dependence of the nuclear DIS data.

fig-1.jpg

The LHC p+pb and pb+pb data open a new, high- Q2 , kinematic regions for nuclear PDF studies. Recently, the first global analysis of nuclear PDFs to include LHC proton-lead ( p+Pb ) Run-I data, EPPS16 [2], appeared. They reported the impact of these data on the EPPS16 nuclear PDFs and shown that the CMS dijets data [8], are essential in constraining the nuclear effects in gluon distributions. The Run-II p+A data as well as Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider (RHIC) [9] will have significantly higher luminosities. Therefore, Run-II data are expected to provide much better constraints in the near future.

3. Analysis Method

In KA15 framework [1] we parametrize the nuclear PDFs fi(A,Z)(x,Q2) which are to be multiplied with the free proton PDFs fip(x,Q2) , taken here to be those of NNLO JR09 PDFs [10]. One can reconstruct the nuclear PDFs as follow at Q02=2 GeV 2 : Here we assume the following functional form for the nuclear modifications In order to accommodate various nuclear target materials, we introduce in which { pi=b1,b2,c1,c2,d1,d2,... } are free fit parameters. To determine the best fit at NNLO, we need to minimize the χ2 with respect to 16 free input nuclear PDFs parameters in above equations. The global goodness-of-fit procedure follows the usual chi–squared method [1]. The optimization of the χ2 values to determine the best parameters of nuclear PDFs is done by the CERN program library MINUIT [11]. The experimental errors are calculated from systematic and statistical errors, added in quadrature. For the determination of nuclear PDFs uncertainties and corresponding observables, we use the standard Hessian method with a global tolerance Δχ2=1 . This method are discussed in details in Refs. [1,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20].

Figure 2

(Color online) Our theoretical predictions based on AT12 NLO and KA15 NNLO nuclear PDFs are compared with the data of the DY cross-section ratios σ DY Fe/σ DY Be . Data points are from the FNAL-E866 experiments at Fermilab [22].

fig-2.jpg

4. Results and discussion

In this section we present a comparison of the KA15 fit with the analyzed nuclear DIS data. A detail comparison of the KA15 NNLO [1] and AT12 NLO [21] x dependence theoretical predictions of the structure function ratios F2A(x,Q2)F2A'(x,Q2) with the analyzed nuclear DIS data are presented in Figure figComparison. In this plot, ratios of structure functions for various nuclei as measured by the JLAB, E139, E140, NMC, and EMC collaborations, compared with our fit. The error bars shown on the experimental data correspond to the systematic and statistical errors added in quadrature. As one can conclude from the figure, these data set into the KA15 fit without causing a significant tension.

Figure 3

(Color online) Comparison of the KA15 NNLO [1] and AT12 NLO [21] theory predictions with the analyzed nuclear DIS data.

fig-3.jpg

In Figure figDYFEtoBe, our theoretical predictions based on AT12 NLO and KA15 NNLO nuclear PDFs are compared with the data of the DY cross-section ratios σDYFe/σDYBe measured by FNAL-E866 [22]. These plots have shown as a function of x for different Q 2 values of 4.5, 5.5, 6.5 and 7.5 GeV 2 .

As one can see from these plots, the FNAL-E866 data on DY cross-section are in a good agreement with both AT12 NLO and KA15 NNLO theory predictions. As we already mentioned, the data from proton-lead ( p-pb ) and lead-lead ( pb-pb ) collisions at the RUN-I at CERN-LHC would be very desirable in order to determine the nuclear PDFs at low values of parton fractional momenta x [2,23].

5. Summary and conclusion

As a short summary, we have presented our global analysis of NNLO nuclear PDFs, KA15, extracted from a larger variety of nuclear DIS data sets. The obtained results are in good agreements with all data analyzed. However, the uncertainties are still significant for all components at small value of x and, clearly, more data is therefore required. In this respect, new data from the p-pb collisions at 13 TeV LHC will be available soon and will provide high-precision DIS constraints for all nuclear parton flavours.

Acknowledgments

Author is especially grateful Hamzeh Khanpour for reading this manuscript and for many useful discussions and comments.

References

1 

H. Khanpour S. Atashbar Tehrani Global analysis of nuclear parton distribution functions and their uncertainties at next-to-next-to-leading order Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology 201693110.1103/physrevd.93.014026014026

2 

K. Eskola P. Paakkinen H. Paukkunen C. Salgado EPPS16 – First nuclear PDFs to include LHC dataProceedings of the The European Physical Society Conference on High Energy PhysicsJuly 2017Venice, Italy18010.22323/1.314.0180

3 

K. Kovarik A. Kusina T. Ježo nCTEQ15: global analysis of nuclear parton distributions with uncertainties in the CTEQ framework Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology 201693810.1103/physrevd.93.085037085037

4 

R. Wang X. Chen Q. Fu Nucl. Phys. B 2017920pp

5 

P. Ru S. Kulagin R. Petti B. Zhang Study of Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology 2016941110.1103/PhysRevD.94.113013

6 

H. Paukkunen Status of nuclear PDFs after the first LHC p–Pb run Nuclear Physics A 20179672412482-s2.0-8503202303510.1016/j.nuclphysa.2017.05.014

7 

E. C. Aschenauer S. Fazio M. A. C. Lamont H. Paukkunen P. Zurita arXiv:1708.05654, arXiv,

8 

S. Chatrchyan [CMS Collaboration] Eur. Phys. J. C 201472951

9 

E. C. Aschenauer arXiv:1602.03922, arXiv,

10 

P. Jimenez-Delgado E. Reya Dynamical next-to-next-to-leading order parton distributions Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology 200979710.1103/PhysRevD.79.074023

11 

F. James MINUIT Function Minimization and Error Analysis: Reference Manual Version 94.1 CERN-D-506 Reference Manual Version 94.1\MINUIT Function Minimization and Error Analysis506

12 

F. Taghavi-Shahri H. Khanpour S. Atashbar Tehrani Z. Alizadeh Yazdi Next-to-next-to-leading order QCD analysis of spin-dependent parton distribution functions and their uncertainties: Jacobi polynomials approach Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology 201693112-s2.0-8497644889110.1103/PhysRevD.93.114024114024

13 

A. D. Martin W. J. Stirling G. Watt Parton distributions for the LHC The European Physical Journal C 200963218928510.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1072-5Zbl1369.81126

14 

S. M. M. Nejad H. Khanpour S. A. Tehrani M. Mahdavi QCD analysis of nucleon structure functions in deep-inelastic neutrino-nucleon scattering: Laplace transform and Jacobi polynomials approach Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics 20169442-s2.0-8499216246510.1103/PhysRevC.94.045201045201

15 

H. Khanpour A. Mirjalili S. A. Tehrani Analytic derivation of the next-to-leading order proton structure function F2p (x,Q2) based on the Laplace transformation Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics 20179532-s2.0-8501571184210.1103/PhysRevC.95.035201035201

16 

L. A. Harland-Lang A. D. Martin P. Motylinski R. S. Thorne Parton distributions in the LHC era: MMHT 2014 PDFs The European Physical Journal C 201575, article 20410.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3397-6

17 

S. Shoeibi H. Khanpour F. Taghavi-Shahri K. Javidan Determination of neutron fracture functions from a global QCD analysis of the leading neutron production at HERA Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology 20179572-s2.0-8501956852810.1103/PhysRevD.95.074011074011

18 

H. Khanpour S. T. Monfared S. Atashbar Tehrani D. Phys. Rev Phys. Rev. D 20177074037

19 

H. Khanpour S. T. Monfared S. Atashbar Tehrani D. Phys. Rev Phys. Rev. D 20177074006

20 

S. Shoeibi H. Khanpour F. Taghavi-Shahri K. Javidan Determination of neutron fracture functions from a global QCD analysis of the leading neutron production at HERA Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology 201795707401110.1103/PhysRevD.95.0740112-s2.0-85019568528

21 

S. Atashbar Tehrani Nuclear parton densities and their uncertainties at the next-to-leading order Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics 201286610.1103/PhysRevC.86.064301

22 

M. A. Vasilev [NuSea Collaboration] Phys. Rev. Lett 1999832304

23 

C. A. Salgado J. Alvarez-Muñiz F. Arleo Proton–nucleus collisions at the LHC: scientific opportunities and requirements Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 20123910.1088/0954-3899/39/1/015010015010

FULL TEXT

Statistics

  • Downloads 18
  • Views 73

Navigation

Refbacks



ISSN: 2413-5453