KnE Energy | The 3rd International Conference on Particle Physics and Astrophysics (ICPPA) | pages: 291–296

, , , , , , and

1. Introduction

BM@N (Baryonic Matter at Nuclotron) is the first experiment at the accelerator complex of NICA-Nuclotron. The aim of the BM@N experiment is to study interactions of relativistic heavy ion beams with fixed targets. The Nuclotron heavy ion beam energy range corresponds to SNN=2.3-3.5 GeV. It is well suited for studies of strange mesons and multi-strange hyperons which are produced in nucleus-nucleus collisions close to the kinematic threshold. The focus of experimental studies will be on hadrons with strangeness, which are produced early in the collision and not present in the initial state of two colliding nuclei. Coalescence of lambda-hyperons with nucleons can produce a variety of light hyper-nuclei [1]. The study of the hyper-nuclei production is expected to provide new insights into the properties of the hyperon-nucleon and hyperon- hyperon interactions. This investigations together with studying productions "cold" nuclear matter in pp and pA reactions give "reference" to pin down nuclear effects.

2. BM@N set-up

A sketch of the proposed experimental set-up is shown in Fig. 1. The experiment combines high precision track measurements with time-of-flight information for particle identification and uses total energy measurements for the analysis of the collision centrality.

Figure 1

Schematic view of the BM@N set-up.


As a typical fixed-target spectrometer, BM@N contains a dipole analyzing magnet. The gap between the poles of the magnet is around 1 m. The magnetic field can be varied up to 1.2 T to get the optimal BM@N detector acceptance and momentum resolution for different processes and beam energies.

The central tracker of the BM@N experiment is based on two-coordinate triple GEM detectors [2]. It is located downstream of the target inside the analyzing magnet. The GEM (Gas Electron Multiplier) detectors have the established technology developed at the CERN workshop and have been used in various experiments (COMPASS, JLAB, STAR, CMS). They sustain high rates of particles and are operational in the strong magnetic field.

The transverse structure of the tripple GEM detector and the schematic view of the two-coordinate GEM detector used in the BM@N experiment are shown in Fig. 2. The signal recording is done from the anode plane using the double-sided strip readout technique with a strip pitch of 800μ and a strip orientation of 0 and 15 with respect to the vertical axis. The readout board is divided into two zones: the outer and inner ones. The inner (hot) zone with shorter strips will be located near the beam line and is intended to cope with a high particle flux in this region [3].

Figure 2

Left) schematic transverse structure of the triple GEM detector. Right) schematic view of the two-coordinate GEM detector with the size of the sensitive area of 163x45 cm 2 .

The drift/cathode pad chambers (DCH/CPC) of the outer tracker are situated behind the magnet. The design parameters of the time-of-flight (ToF) detectors based on multi-gap resistive plate chambers (mRPC) with a strip read-out allow us to discriminate between hadrons ( π , K , p ) as well as light nuclei with the momentum up to few GeV/c produced in multi-particle events. The zero degree calorimeter (ZDC) is designed for the analysis of the collision centrality by measuring the energy of forward going particles. The purpose of the trigger detectors, partially covering the backward hemisphere around the target, is to trigger central heavy ion collisions and provide a start time (T0) signal for the mRPC detectors. An electro-magnetic calorimeter (ECAL) is installed behind the outer DCH/CPC chambers and mRPC-2 wall to study processes with electro-magnetic probes ( γ,e+,e- ) in the final state.

3. Technical run with deuteron beam

The technical run of the BM@N detector was performed with the deuteron beam in December 2016. The view of the BM@N setup used in the run is presented in Fig. 3 (left). The starting configuration of the central tracker was based on six GEM stations combined from 5 GEM detectors with the size of 66x41 cm 2 and 2 GEM detectors with the size of 163x45 cm 2 . Since the amount of the detectors was quite limited, the tracking stations were arranged to have the beam passing through their centers (Fig. 3 (right)).

Figure 3

Left) BM@N set-up used in the deuteron run. Right) products of a deuteron-target interaction reconstructed in the central tracker.


The main goal of the technical run was the commissioning of the central GEM tracker and testing and calibration of the other subsystems: ToF, T0 and trigger detectors, ZDC and ECAL calorimeters. The methodical goal of the run was to trace the primary deuteron beam through the set-up with subsequent reconstruction of its momentum at different values of the magnetic field. The research program was devoted to measurements of inelastic reactions d+TargetX with the beam kinetic energy of 4A GeV and different targets: C2H4,C,Cu . Since the GEM tracker configuration was tuned to measure relatively high-momentum beam particles, the geometric acceptance for relatively soft decay products of strange V0-particles was rather low. The Monte Carlo simulation showed that only 4% of Λ hyperons and 0.8% of Ks0 could be reconstructed.

4. Event reconstruction and Monte Carlo simulation

The track reconstruction method was based on a so-called “cellular automaton” approach [4]. The tracks found were used to reconstruct primary and secondary vertices using the “KF-particle” formalism [5]. In fact, both (track and vertex) reconstruction packages were adapted from the CbmRoot software framework, where they were used very extensively for Monte Carlo performance studies of the Silicon Tracking System (STS) of the CBM detector.

To test a quality of the event reconstruction procedure and to confirm our understanding of the detector operation features the “realistic” Monte Carlo simulation of the spectrometer operation was performed. The event samples of dA collisions were produced with the DCM-QGSM event generator [6]. The passage of particles through the setup volume was simulated with the GEANT program integrated into the BmnRoot software framework. To properly describe the GEM detector response in the magnetic field the microsimulation package Garfield++ was used. The package gives very detailed description of the processes inside the GEM detector, including the drift and diffusion of ionization electrons in electric and magnetic fields and the electron multiplication in GEM foils, so that the output signal from the readout plane can be reproduced.

5. Results of data analysis

Λ -hyperons were reconstructed using their decay mode into two oppositely-charged tracks. The signal event topology (decay of a relatively long-lived particle into two tracks) defined the selection criteria: relatively large distance of the closest approach to the primary vertex of decay products, small track-to-track separation in the decay vertex, relatively large decay length of the mother particle. Since particle identification at this stage of the analysis was not used, all positive tracks were considered as protons and all negative as π- . To reconstruct Λ -hyperons, 760 thousands events with Λ -candidates, i.e. containing at least one positive and one negative tracks, were analyzed for 3 targets. The obtained invariant mass distribution of pπ- is shown in Fig. 4 along with the simulated result. One can see a pronounced Λ -peak.

Figure 4

Invariant mass spectrum of pπ- : left) experiment, right) simulation.

Table 1

Beam parameters and setup at different stages of the experiment BM@N.

year 2016 2017 spring 2017 autumn 2019 2020 and later
beam d C Ar,Kr Au Au,p
max. intensity, Hz 1M 1M 1M 1M 10M
trigger rate, Hz 10k 10k 20k 20k 50k
GEM traker status 6 GEM half pl. 8 GEM half pl. 10 GEM half pl. 8 GEM full pl. 8 GEM + 4 Si
exp. status tech. run tech. run phys. run stage 1 phys. stage 2 phys.

6. Conclusions

The BM@N experiment is in the starting phase of its operation and has recorded first experimental data. The technical run was performed in the deuteron beam with the kinetic energy of 4 GeV per nucleon. Experimental data of minimum bias interactions of the deuteron beam with different targets were analyzed with the aim to reconstruct tracks, primary and secondary vertexes using the central tracking detectors. The signal of Λ -hyperon was reconstructed in the invariant mass spectrum of particles originated from secondary vertexes. The reconstructed results were reproduced in realistic Monte Carlo simulation with the identical parameters of the fit. To improve the vertex and momentum resolution and reduce the background under the Λ -hyperon signal additional planes of the GEM detectors and a set of silicon detectors in front of the GEM tracking detectors will be implemented (Table 1.).



J. Steinheimer H. Stoecker I. Augustin A. Andronic T. Saito P. Senger Strangeness at the international Facility for Antiproton and Ion ResearchProgress in Particle and Nuclear Physics20096223133172-s2.0-6474908938910.1016/j.ppnp.2008.12.037


D. Baranov et. al (BM@N Collaboration) 2017 J. Instrum 12 C06041


BM@N Collaboration 2017 BM@N Technical Design Report for the GEM Tracking System pp 18-28


Akishina V., Kisel I. 2015 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 599 012024


Gorbunov S., Kisel I. 2007 CBM-SOFT-note-2007-003


Gudima K., Mashnik S., Sierk A. 2001 LANL Report LA-UR01-6804



  • Downloads 15
  • Views 105



ISSN: 2413-5453