Download fulltext
HTML
1.
Cruz N, Santos K, Matuoka M, Kasahara N. Authors’ Reply to Unvalidated Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure Equations Should Not Be Used For Research. JOVR [Internet]. 2022Nov.24 [cited 2024Apr.27];17(4):603–604. Available from: https://knepublishing.com/index.php/JOVR/article/view/12344
https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v17i4.12344
statistics
- 356 Abstract Views
- 300 PDF Views
- 0 HTML Views
authors
-
Natasha Cruz
Natasha Cruz
Department of Ophthalmology, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericordia de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
-
Katia Santos
Katia Santos
Department of Ophthalmology, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericordia de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
-
Mateus Matuoka
Mateus Matuoka
Department of Ophthalmology, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericordia de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
-
Niro Kasahara
Niro Kasahara
Department of Ophthalmology, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericordia de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Published Date
- Nov 24, 2022
Authors' Reply to Unvalidated Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure Equations Should Not Be Used For Research
Abstract
This is a Reply Letter to Unvalidated Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure Equations Should Not Be Used For Research and does not have an abstract. Please download the PDF or view the article HTML.
Keywords:
Not applicable, None, Not required
References
1. Cruz NF, Santos KS, Matuoka ML, Kasahara N. Translaminar pressure difference and ocular perfusion pressure in glaucomatous eyes with different optic disc sizes. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2021;16:171–177.
2. Xie XB, Zhang XJ, Fu J, Wang H, Jonas JB, Peng X, et al. Intracranial pressure estimation by orbital subarachnoid space measurement. Crit Care 2013;17:R162.
3. Jonas JB, Wang N, Wang YX, You QS, Yang D, Xie X, et al. Subfoveal choroidal thickness and cerebrospinal fluid pressure: The Beijing Eye Study 2011. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014;55:1292–1298.
4. Jonas JB, Wang N, Yang D, Ritch R, Panda-Jonas S. Facts and myths of cerebrospinal fluid pressure for the physiology of the eye. Prog Retin Eye Res 2015;46:67–83.
5. Kasahara N, Matuoka ML, Santos KS, Cruz NF, Martins AR, Nigro S. Validation of an equation model to predict intracranial pressure in clinical studies. Innov Clin Neurosci 2018;15:27–29.
6. Hall AR, Tilling L, editors. The correspondence of Isaac Newton. Volume 5. Cambridge: CUP. P. 1709–1713.
7. Price DA, Grzybowski A, Eikenberry J, Januleviciene I, Verticchio Vercellin AC, Mathew S, et al. Review of noninvasive intracranial pressure measurement techniques for ophthalmology applications. Br J Ophthalmol 2020;104:887–892.
2. Xie XB, Zhang XJ, Fu J, Wang H, Jonas JB, Peng X, et al. Intracranial pressure estimation by orbital subarachnoid space measurement. Crit Care 2013;17:R162.
3. Jonas JB, Wang N, Wang YX, You QS, Yang D, Xie X, et al. Subfoveal choroidal thickness and cerebrospinal fluid pressure: The Beijing Eye Study 2011. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014;55:1292–1298.
4. Jonas JB, Wang N, Yang D, Ritch R, Panda-Jonas S. Facts and myths of cerebrospinal fluid pressure for the physiology of the eye. Prog Retin Eye Res 2015;46:67–83.
5. Kasahara N, Matuoka ML, Santos KS, Cruz NF, Martins AR, Nigro S. Validation of an equation model to predict intracranial pressure in clinical studies. Innov Clin Neurosci 2018;15:27–29.
6. Hall AR, Tilling L, editors. The correspondence of Isaac Newton. Volume 5. Cambridge: CUP. P. 1709–1713.
7. Price DA, Grzybowski A, Eikenberry J, Januleviciene I, Verticchio Vercellin AC, Mathew S, et al. Review of noninvasive intracranial pressure measurement techniques for ophthalmology applications. Br J Ophthalmol 2020;104:887–892.