https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v17i3.11578
statistics
- 637 Abstract Views
- 399 PDF Views
- 0 HTML Views
- Cited by 2 articles
authors
-
Marzieh Salehi Fadardi
Marzieh Salehi Fadardi
Department of Optometry & Vision Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
-
Javad Salehi Fadardi
Javad Salehi Fadardi
Department of Psychology, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran
-
Monireh Mahjoob
Monireh Mahjoob
Health Promotion Research Center, Department of Optometry, Rehabilitation Faculty, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
-
Hassan Doosti
Hassan Doosti
Department of Statistics, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
Published Date
- Aug 9, 2022
Post-saccadic Eye Movement Indices Under Cognitive Load: A Path Analysis to Determine Visual Performance
Abstract
Purpose: The evidence on the linear relationship between cognitive load, saccade, fixation, and task performance was uncertain. We tested pathway models for degraded task performance resulting from changes in saccadic and post-saccadic fixation under cognitive load.
Methods: Participants’ (n = 38) eye movements were recorded using a post-saccadic discrimination task with and without arithmetic operations to impose cognitive load, validated through recording heart rate variability and subjective measurement.
Results: Results showed that cognitive load led to longer latencies of saccade and fixation; more inaccurate responses and fewer secondary saccades (P < 0.001). Longer saccade latencies influenced task performance indirectly via increases in fixation latency, therefore, longer reaction times and higher response errors were observed due to limited fixation duration on desired target.
Conclusion: We suggest that latency and duration of fixation indicate efficiency of information processing and can predict the speed and accuracy of task performance under cognitive load.
Keywords:
Eye Movement, Saccades, Task Performance
References
2. Drewes J, VanRullen R . Ongoing EEG oscillations and saccadic latency. J Vis 2010;10:508–508.
3. Drewes J, VanRullen R . This is the rhythm of your eyes: The phase of ongoing electroencephalogram oscillations modulates saccadic reaction time. J Neurosci 2011;31: 4698–4708.
4. Fadardi MS, Abel LA. The effect of cognitive load on saccadic charactristics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:4865–4865.
5. Roberts RJ, Hager LD, Heron C. Prefrontal cognitive processes: Working memory and inhibition in the antisaccade task. J Exp Psychol Gen 1994;123:374.
6. Stuyven E, Van der Goten K, Vandierendonck A, Claeys K, Crevits L . The effect of cognitive load on saccadic eye movements. Acta Psychol 2000;104:69–85.
7. Mahjoob M, Anderson AJ . Contrast discrimination under task-induced mental load. Vis Res 2019;1:84–89.
8. Fadardi MS, Abel LA. Saccades under mental load in infantile nystagmus syndrome and controls. Optom Vis Sci 2018;95:373–383.
9. Simons DJ. Attentional capture and inattentional blindness. Trends Cogn Sci 2000;4:147–155.
10. Lleras C. Path analysis. Enc Soc Meas 2005;3:25–30.
11. Bieg HJ, Bresciani JP, Bülthoff HH, Chuang LL. Looking for discriminating is different from looking for looking’s sake. PLoS One 2012;7:e45445.
12. Anderson AJ, Smyrnis N, Noorani I, Carpenter RH. Modelling prosaccade latencies across multiple decisionmaking tasks. Neuroscience 2021;452:345–353.
13. Kapoula Z, Robinson D. Saccadic undershoot is not inevitable: Saccades can be accurate. Vis Res 1986;26:735–743.
14. Walker R, McSorley E. The parallel programming of voluntary and reflexive saccades. Vis Res 2006;46:2082–2093.
15. Halliday J, Carpenter RH. The effect of cognitive distraction on saccadic latency. Perception 2010;39:41–50.
16. Zhai X, Enderle JD. Visually guided horizontal saccades under the double-step paradigm. J Biomed Eng Med Devices 2016;10:1–7.
17. Toyomura A, Omori T. Saccadic undershoot can be explained as a trade-off between accuracy and flight-time. Proc ISSCIE Int Symp Stoch Syst Theory Appl 2004;130– 134.
18. Wang Z, Dell’Osso L. Being “slow to see” is a dynamic visual function consequence of infantile nystagmus syndrome: Model predictions and patient data identify stimulus timing as its cause. Vis Res 2007;47:1550–1560.
19. Dunn MJ, Margrain TH, Woodhouse JM, Erichsen JT. Visual processing in infantile nystagmus is not slow. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015;56: 5094–5101.
20. Salvia E, Guillot A, Collet C. The effects of mental arithmetic strain on behavioral and physiological responses. J Psychophysiol 2013;27:173–184.
21. Reddi B, Asrress KN, Carpenter RH. Accuracy, information, and response time in a saccadic decision task. J. Neurophysiol 2003;90:3538–3546.
22. Reddi B, Carpenter RH. The influence of urgency on decision time. Nat Neurosci 2000;3:827.
23. Guyader N, Malsert J, Marendaz C. Having to identify a target reduces latencies in prosaccades but not in antisaccades. Psychol Res PRPF 2010;74:12–20.
24. Van Stockum S, MacAskill MR, Myall D, Anderson TJ. A perceptual discrimination task abnormally facilitates reflexive saccades in Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurosci 2011;33: 2091–2100.
25. Recarte MA, Nunes LM. Mental workload while driving: Effects on visual search, discrimination, and decision making. J Exp Psychol Appl 2003;9:119.
26. Tsai YF, Viirre E, Strychacz C, Chase B, Jung T.P. Task performance and eye activity: Predicting behavior relating to cognitive workload. Aviat Space Environ Med 2007:78:B176–B185.
27. Nuthmann A. Fixation durations in scene viewing: Modeling the effects of local image features, oculomotor parameters, and task. Psychon Bull Rev 2017;24:370–392.